Are omicron infections more frequently associated with bacterial co-infections?

Faig Teymurlu, Yaşar Selim Sarsilmaz, Özge Güzel Aygören, Beltinge Gültekin, Şeymanur Gül, Aslı Suner, Abdullah Sayiner
{"title":"Are omicron infections more frequently associated with bacterial co-infections?","authors":"Faig Teymurlu, Yaşar Selim Sarsilmaz, Özge Güzel Aygören, Beltinge Gültekin, Şeymanur Gül, Aslı Suner, Abdullah Sayiner","doi":"10.5578/tt.202402885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical observations suggest that Omicron infections may present with different radiographic findings and be more frequently associated with bacterial co-infections, but there is a paucity of published data. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic findings of patients hospitalized with Omicron versus alpha-delta infections.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between January 1, 2021 and June 30, 2021 (alpha and delta period) and between January 1, 2022 and July 31, 2022 (Omicron period), respectively 149 and 163 COVID-19 PCR-positive patients who were followed up in the COVID-19 ward and intensive care unit of a tertiary care center were included in the study. Clinical (presence of fever and purulent sputum), laboratory and radiologic findings of the two groups were compared. Sputum culture results and antibiotic use were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>In the alpha/delta group, ground glass opacities were seen in 75.2% (112) of the patients, consolidation in 2.7% (4), and both findings together in 6.0% (9). In the Omicron group, ground glass was seen in 40.5% (66), consolidation in 5.5% (9), and both ground glass and consolidation together in 8.7% (13) (p< 0.001). Procalcitonin levels were 0.25 µg/L or higher in 29.6% and 43.9% of the patients in the alpha/delta and Omicron groups, respectively. Mean PCT values were 0.36 µg/L and 1.93 µg/L, respectively (p> 0.05). CRP levels were similar in both groups. Mean LDH level in the Omicron group was 278 U/L and was significantly lower than the alpha/delta group (381 U/L) (p< 0.001). The proportion of patients requiring intensive care during hospitalization was higher in the alpha/delta group (36.2% vs 26.4%) (p= 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lower LDH levels, less need for intensive care and less frequent development of ARDS indicate that Omicron causes milder disease, while a higher rate of consolidation and higher procalcitonin levels suggest a higher frequency of bacterial co-infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":519894,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","volume":"72 2","pages":"131-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.202402885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical observations suggest that Omicron infections may present with different radiographic findings and be more frequently associated with bacterial co-infections, but there is a paucity of published data. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic findings of patients hospitalized with Omicron versus alpha-delta infections.

Materials and methods: Between January 1, 2021 and June 30, 2021 (alpha and delta period) and between January 1, 2022 and July 31, 2022 (Omicron period), respectively 149 and 163 COVID-19 PCR-positive patients who were followed up in the COVID-19 ward and intensive care unit of a tertiary care center were included in the study. Clinical (presence of fever and purulent sputum), laboratory and radiologic findings of the two groups were compared. Sputum culture results and antibiotic use were also evaluated.

Result: In the alpha/delta group, ground glass opacities were seen in 75.2% (112) of the patients, consolidation in 2.7% (4), and both findings together in 6.0% (9). In the Omicron group, ground glass was seen in 40.5% (66), consolidation in 5.5% (9), and both ground glass and consolidation together in 8.7% (13) (p< 0.001). Procalcitonin levels were 0.25 µg/L or higher in 29.6% and 43.9% of the patients in the alpha/delta and Omicron groups, respectively. Mean PCT values were 0.36 µg/L and 1.93 µg/L, respectively (p> 0.05). CRP levels were similar in both groups. Mean LDH level in the Omicron group was 278 U/L and was significantly lower than the alpha/delta group (381 U/L) (p< 0.001). The proportion of patients requiring intensive care during hospitalization was higher in the alpha/delta group (36.2% vs 26.4%) (p= 0.06).

Conclusions: Lower LDH levels, less need for intensive care and less frequent development of ARDS indicate that Omicron causes milder disease, while a higher rate of consolidation and higher procalcitonin levels suggest a higher frequency of bacterial co-infections.

奥米克感染是否经常与细菌合并感染有关?
导言:临床观察表明,奥米克龙感染可能表现出不同的影像学结果,并且更常与细菌合并感染相关,但目前公开发表的数据还很少。本研究旨在比较奥米克龙感染与α-δ感染住院患者的临床和影像学结果:研究纳入了 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日(α 和 δ 期)和 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日(Omicron 期)期间,分别在一家三级医疗中心的 COVID-19 病房和重症监护室随访的 149 名和 163 名 COVID-19 PCR 阳性患者。比较了两组患者的临床(发热和脓痰)、实验室和放射学结果。此外,还对痰培养结果和抗生素使用情况进行了评估:在α/δ组中,75.2%(112 人)的患者出现磨玻璃不透明,2.7%(4 人)的患者出现合并症,6.0%(9 人)的患者同时出现这两种结果。在 Omicron 组中,40.5%(66 人)的患者出现玻璃钙化,5.5%(9 人)的患者出现巩固性玻璃钙化,8.7%(13 人)的患者同时出现玻璃钙化和巩固性玻璃钙化(P< 0.001)。α/δ组和 Omicron 组分别有 29.6% 和 43.9% 的患者的降钙素原水平达到或超过 0.25 µg/L。PCT 平均值分别为 0.36 微克/升和 1.93 微克/升(P> 0.05)。两组的 CRP 水平相似。Omicron 组的 LDH 平均水平为 278 U/L,明显低于 alpha/delta 组(381 U/L)(p< 0.001)。住院期间需要重症监护的患者比例在 alpha/delta 组更高(36.2% vs 26.4%)(p= 0.06):结论:较低的 LDH 水平、较少的重症监护需求和较少的 ARDS 发生率表明,Omicron 引起的疾病较轻,而较高的合并率和较高的降钙素原水平表明细菌合并感染的频率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信