Measuring the Interprofessional Health of the Pediatric Cardiovascular Operating Room Work Environment.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2024-06-11 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000737
Jason M Thornton, Jean A Connor, Patricia A Dwyer, Courtney L Porter, Lauren P Hartwell, Zachary DiPasquale, Araz Chiloyan, Patricia A Hickey
{"title":"Measuring the Interprofessional Health of the Pediatric Cardiovascular Operating Room Work Environment.","authors":"Jason M Thornton, Jean A Connor, Patricia A Dwyer, Courtney L Porter, Lauren P Hartwell, Zachary DiPasquale, Araz Chiloyan, Patricia A Hickey","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric cardiac surgery is complex and has significant risk, requiring interprofessional teamwork for optimal outcomes. Unhealthy work environments have been linked to poor patient outcomes, staff dissatisfaction, and intention to leave. We describe the interprofessional health of pediatric cardiovascular operating room (CVOR) work environments in the United States and the establishment of a healthy work environment (HWE) benchmark score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing the American Association of Critical Care Nurses Healthy Work Environments Assessment Tool (HWEAT), interprofessional staff from 11 pediatric CVORs were surveyed. Responses were aggregated, summarized, and stratified by role to examine differences. The following phase used an e-Delphi approach to obtain expert consensus on a benchmark target.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 11 centers, 179 (60%) completed surveys were reviewed. The interprofessional mean HWEAT score was 3.55 (2.65-4.34). Mean scores for each standard were within the \"good\" range. Participants reported the highest scores for effective decision-making, with a mean of 3.69 (3.00-4.20). Meaningful recognition scored lowest, mean 3.26 (2.33-4.07). When stratified, surgeons reported higher overall HWE scores (M = 3.79, SD = 0.13) than nurses (M = 3.41, SD = 0.19; <i>P</i> = 0.02, two-tailed). The proposed benchmark was 3.50.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first time the American Association of Critical Care Nurses HWEAT has been used to describe the interprofessional health of work environments in pediatric CVORs in the United States. The targeted benchmark can support pediatric CVOR improvement strategies. Creating and sustaining an HWE is an interprofessional opportunity to support high-quality patient outcomes and clinical excellence.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11167224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pediatric cardiac surgery is complex and has significant risk, requiring interprofessional teamwork for optimal outcomes. Unhealthy work environments have been linked to poor patient outcomes, staff dissatisfaction, and intention to leave. We describe the interprofessional health of pediatric cardiovascular operating room (CVOR) work environments in the United States and the establishment of a healthy work environment (HWE) benchmark score.

Methods: Utilizing the American Association of Critical Care Nurses Healthy Work Environments Assessment Tool (HWEAT), interprofessional staff from 11 pediatric CVORs were surveyed. Responses were aggregated, summarized, and stratified by role to examine differences. The following phase used an e-Delphi approach to obtain expert consensus on a benchmark target.

Results: Across 11 centers, 179 (60%) completed surveys were reviewed. The interprofessional mean HWEAT score was 3.55 (2.65-4.34). Mean scores for each standard were within the "good" range. Participants reported the highest scores for effective decision-making, with a mean of 3.69 (3.00-4.20). Meaningful recognition scored lowest, mean 3.26 (2.33-4.07). When stratified, surgeons reported higher overall HWE scores (M = 3.79, SD = 0.13) than nurses (M = 3.41, SD = 0.19; P = 0.02, two-tailed). The proposed benchmark was 3.50.

Conclusions: This is the first time the American Association of Critical Care Nurses HWEAT has been used to describe the interprofessional health of work environments in pediatric CVORs in the United States. The targeted benchmark can support pediatric CVOR improvement strategies. Creating and sustaining an HWE is an interprofessional opportunity to support high-quality patient outcomes and clinical excellence.

衡量小儿心血管手术室工作环境的跨专业健康状况。
简介:小儿心脏手术复杂且风险大,需要跨专业团队合作才能取得最佳效果。不健康的工作环境与不良的患者预后、员工不满和离职意向有关。我们描述了美国儿科心血管手术室(CVOR)的跨专业健康工作环境,并建立了健康工作环境(HWE)基准评分:方法:利用美国重症监护护士协会健康工作环境评估工具(HWEAT),对 11 家儿科心血管手术室的跨专业员工进行了调查。对回答进行汇总、总结,并按角色进行分层,以检查差异。下一阶段采用电子德尔菲法就基准目标达成专家共识:11 个中心共审查了 179 份(60%)完成的调查问卷。专业间 HWEAT 平均得分为 3.55(2.65-4.34)。每项标准的平均得分都在 "良好 "范围内。参与者对有效决策的评分最高,平均分为 3.69(3.00-4.20)。有意义的认可得分最低,平均为 3.26(2.33-4.07)分。分层后,外科医生的 HWE 总分(M = 3.79,SD = 0.13)高于护士(M = 3.41,SD = 0.19;P = 0.02,双尾)。建议的基准为 3.50:这是首次使用美国重症监护护士协会 HWEAT 来描述美国儿科 CVOR 工作环境的跨专业健康状况。有针对性的基准可以支持儿科 CVOR 的改进策略。创建和维持 HWE 是支持高质量患者预后和卓越临床的跨专业机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信