Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Flow on Intrapharyngeal Pressure During Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy Under Deep Sedation.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jie Li, Bin Liu, Lin Gao, Na Li, Xiao-Zhong Yuan, Yi-Xuan Zhu, Kang Deng
{"title":"Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Flow on Intrapharyngeal Pressure During Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy Under Deep Sedation.","authors":"Jie Li, Bin Liu, Lin Gao, Na Li, Xiao-Zhong Yuan, Yi-Xuan Zhu, Kang Deng","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The flow reaching the vocal folds may be lower than that at the output of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) system. This could be due to upper-respiratory obstruction, oxygen leakage, or other factors. The objective of this study was to observe the effect of flow through a nasopharyngeal airway on intrapharyngeal pressure (IPP) in subjects undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled for FOB were invited to participate. Measurements were performed at flows of 0-60 L/min; the subjects wore WN-N95 folding medical protective masks (N95) and either underwent FOB or not. IPP at each flow was recorded following 15 s of ventilation, and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the gastric sinus was measured before and after FOB. Hypoxemia, reflux aspiration, and other pertinent events were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty subjects undergoing FOB at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University participated in this trial from October 2022-September 2023. IPP increased significantly with an increase in flow and also increased after placing the N95 mask with the same flow (<i>P</i> < .001). When results from before to after FOB were compared, the difference in CSA was statistically significant 263.6 (220.7-300.5) mm<sup>2</sup> vs 305.5 (275.4-329.5) mm<sup>2</sup>, <i>P</i> < .001, but the difference in the risk of reflux aspiration was not statistically significant (0% vs 6.7%, <i>P</i> = .13). Complication rates during treatment were 8.3% for hypoxemia, 0% for reflux aspiration, 1.7% for hypertension, 1.7% for hypotension, 6.7% for tachycardia, 5% for bradycardia, and 10% for postoperative nausea and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HFNC can provide effective oxygen therapy for people undergoing FOB, and increases in IPP with flow in the range of 0-60 L/min may not increase the risk of reflux aspiration.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"1275-1283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The flow reaching the vocal folds may be lower than that at the output of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) system. This could be due to upper-respiratory obstruction, oxygen leakage, or other factors. The objective of this study was to observe the effect of flow through a nasopharyngeal airway on intrapharyngeal pressure (IPP) in subjects undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB).

Methods: Patients scheduled for FOB were invited to participate. Measurements were performed at flows of 0-60 L/min; the subjects wore WN-N95 folding medical protective masks (N95) and either underwent FOB or not. IPP at each flow was recorded following 15 s of ventilation, and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the gastric sinus was measured before and after FOB. Hypoxemia, reflux aspiration, and other pertinent events were recorded.

Results: Sixty subjects undergoing FOB at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University participated in this trial from October 2022-September 2023. IPP increased significantly with an increase in flow and also increased after placing the N95 mask with the same flow (P < .001). When results from before to after FOB were compared, the difference in CSA was statistically significant 263.6 (220.7-300.5) mm2 vs 305.5 (275.4-329.5) mm2, P < .001, but the difference in the risk of reflux aspiration was not statistically significant (0% vs 6.7%, P = .13). Complication rates during treatment were 8.3% for hypoxemia, 0% for reflux aspiration, 1.7% for hypertension, 1.7% for hypotension, 6.7% for tachycardia, 5% for bradycardia, and 10% for postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Conclusions: HFNC can provide effective oxygen therapy for people undergoing FOB, and increases in IPP with flow in the range of 0-60 L/min may not increase the risk of reflux aspiration.

深度镇静下进行纤维支气管镜检查时高流量鼻导管对咽内压的影响
背景:到达声带的流量可能低于高流量鼻插管(HFNC)系统的输出流量。这可能是由于上呼吸道阻塞、氧气泄漏或其他因素造成的。本研究旨在观察通过鼻咽通气道的气流对接受纤维支气管镜检查(FOB)的受试者咽内压(IPP)的影响:方法:邀请计划接受纤维支气管镜检查的患者参加。测量在 0-60 升/分钟的流量下进行;受试者佩戴 WN-N95 折叠式医用防护口罩(N95),接受或不接受 FOB。通气 15 秒后记录每个流量下的 IPP,并在 FOB 前后测量胃窦的横截面积 (CSA)。记录了低氧血症、反流吸入和其他相关事件:60 名在嘉兴学院附属医院接受 FOB 的受试者参加了 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 9 月的试验。随着流量的增加,IPP明显增加,而在佩戴相同流量的N95口罩后,IPP也会增加(P < .001)。比较 FOB 前后的结果,CSA 的差异有统计学意义 263.6 (220.7-300.5) mm2 vs 305.5 (275.4-329.5) mm2,P < .001,但反流吸入风险的差异无统计学意义(0% vs 6.7%,P = .13)。治疗期间的并发症发生率为:低氧血症 8.3%、反流吸入 0%、高血压 1.7%、低血压 1.7%、心动过速 6.7%、心动过缓 5%、术后恶心呕吐 10%:HFNC 可为接受 FOB 的患者提供有效的氧疗,在 0-60 升/分钟的流量范围内增加 IPP 可能不会增加反流吸入的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信