Streamlining Acute Abdominal Aortic Dissection Management-An AI-based CT Imaging Workflow.

Anish Raj, Ahmad Allababidi, Hany Kayed, Andreas L H Gerken, Julia Müller, Stefan O Schoenberg, Frank G Zöllner, Johann S Rink
{"title":"Streamlining Acute Abdominal Aortic Dissection Management-An AI-based CT Imaging Workflow.","authors":"Anish Raj, Ahmad Allababidi, Hany Kayed, Andreas L H Gerken, Julia Müller, Stefan O Schoenberg, Frank G Zöllner, Johann S Rink","doi":"10.1007/s10278-024-01164-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Life-threatening acute aortic dissection (AD) demands timely diagnosis for effective intervention. To streamline intrahospital workflows, automated detection of AD in abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans seems useful to assist humans. We aimed at creating a robust convolutional neural network (CNN)-based pipeline capable of real-time screening for signs of abdominal AD in CT. In this retrospective study, abdominal CT data from AD patients presenting with AD and from non-AD patients were collected (n 195, AD cases 94, mean age 65.9 years, female ratio 35.8%). A CNN-based algorithm was developed with the goal of enabling a robust, automated, and highly sensitive detection of abdominal AD. Two sets from internal (n = 32, AD cases 16) and external sources (n = 1189, AD cases 100) were procured for validation. The abdominal region was extracted, followed by the automatic isolation of the aorta region of interest (ROI) and highlighting of the membrane via edge extraction, followed by classification of the aortic ROI as dissected/healthy. A fivefold cross-validation was employed on the internal set, and an ensemble of the 5 trained models was used to predict the internal and external validation set. Evaluation metrics included receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and balanced accuracy. The AUC, balanced accuracy, and sensitivity scores of the internal dataset were 0.932 (CI 0.891-0.963), 0.860, and 0.885, respectively. For the internal validation dataset, the AUC, balanced accuracy, and sensitivity scores were 0.887 (CI 0.732-0.988), 0.781, and 0.875, respectively. Furthermore, for the external validation dataset, AUC, balanced accuracy, and sensitivity scores were 0.993 (CI 0.918-0.994), 0.933, and 1.000, respectively. The proposed automated pipeline could assist humans in expediting acute aortic dissection management when integrated into clinical workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2729-2739"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01164-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Life-threatening acute aortic dissection (AD) demands timely diagnosis for effective intervention. To streamline intrahospital workflows, automated detection of AD in abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans seems useful to assist humans. We aimed at creating a robust convolutional neural network (CNN)-based pipeline capable of real-time screening for signs of abdominal AD in CT. In this retrospective study, abdominal CT data from AD patients presenting with AD and from non-AD patients were collected (n 195, AD cases 94, mean age 65.9 years, female ratio 35.8%). A CNN-based algorithm was developed with the goal of enabling a robust, automated, and highly sensitive detection of abdominal AD. Two sets from internal (n = 32, AD cases 16) and external sources (n = 1189, AD cases 100) were procured for validation. The abdominal region was extracted, followed by the automatic isolation of the aorta region of interest (ROI) and highlighting of the membrane via edge extraction, followed by classification of the aortic ROI as dissected/healthy. A fivefold cross-validation was employed on the internal set, and an ensemble of the 5 trained models was used to predict the internal and external validation set. Evaluation metrics included receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and balanced accuracy. The AUC, balanced accuracy, and sensitivity scores of the internal dataset were 0.932 (CI 0.891-0.963), 0.860, and 0.885, respectively. For the internal validation dataset, the AUC, balanced accuracy, and sensitivity scores were 0.887 (CI 0.732-0.988), 0.781, and 0.875, respectively. Furthermore, for the external validation dataset, AUC, balanced accuracy, and sensitivity scores were 0.993 (CI 0.918-0.994), 0.933, and 1.000, respectively. The proposed automated pipeline could assist humans in expediting acute aortic dissection management when integrated into clinical workflows.

Abstract Image

简化急性腹主动脉夹层管理--基于人工智能的 CT 成像工作流程。
危及生命的急性主动脉夹层(AD)需要及时诊断以进行有效干预。为了简化院内工作流程,在腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)中自动检测主动脉夹层似乎可以为人类提供帮助。我们的目标是创建一个基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的强大管道,能够实时筛查 CT 中的腹部 AD 征兆。在这项回顾性研究中,我们收集了AD患者和非AD患者的腹部CT数据(n 195,AD病例94,平均年龄65.9岁,女性比例35.8%)。研究人员开发了一种基于 CNN 的算法,目的是对腹部 AD 进行稳健、自动和高灵敏度的检测。我们从内部(n = 32,AD 病例 16 例)和外部来源(n = 1189,AD 病例 100 例)获取了两组数据进行验证。首先提取腹部区域,然后自动分离主动脉感兴趣区(ROI),并通过边缘提取突出膜,最后将主动脉 ROI 分类为解剖/健康。在内部集上采用了五重交叉验证,并使用 5 个训练有素模型的集合来预测内部和外部验证集。评估指标包括接收者操作特征曲线(AUC)和平衡准确率。内部数据集的AUC、平衡准确度和灵敏度得分分别为0.932(CI 0.891-0.963)、0.860和0.885。内部验证数据集的 AUC、平衡准确度和灵敏度得分分别为 0.887(CI 0.732-0.988)、0.781 和 0.875。此外,对于外部验证数据集,AUC、平衡准确度和灵敏度得分分别为 0.993(CI 0.918-0.994)、0.933 和 1.000。所提出的自动管道在整合到临床工作流程中后,可以帮助人类加快急性主动脉夹层的处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信