[GMK rotating hinge prosthesis. A valid option for complex revision knee prosthetic surgery].

J F Garrido-Ferrera, V Marquina-Moraleda, L Marco-Díaz, R Colomina-Rodríguez, L Hernández-Ferrando
{"title":"[GMK rotating hinge prosthesis. A valid option for complex revision knee prosthetic surgery].","authors":"J F Garrido-Ferrera, V Marquina-Moraleda, L Marco-Díaz, R Colomina-Rodríguez, L Hernández-Ferrando","doi":"10.35366/115809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>revision joint replacement surgery presents a surgical challenge. The use of rotating hinge prostheses is an option in patients with femorotibial bone defects, ligament insufficiency, or significant deformities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of a series of patients who underwent surgery using the GMK Hinge (Medacta®) rotational hinge model.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>a descriptive, retrospective, and analytical study was conducted on a series of 36 patients, with a mean age of 72.5 years (47-85), operated on by the same surgical team between January 2015 and January 2022. The etiology of revision was chronic infection in 38.9% of cases, instability in 33.3%, aseptic loosening in 19.4%, and stiffness in 8.4%. The Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were used to assess functional outcomes. The degree of femorotibial bone defect was evaluated using the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification. Postoperative complications are also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>a total of 36 patients, 17 males and 19 females, were included, with a mean follow-up of 30 months (12-66). Twelve patients had type 1 defects, ten had 2A defects, ten had 2B defects, and two had type 3 defects on the femoral side, with the use of wedges required for asymmetrical defects (21 patients). The predominant tibial defect was type 1 without the need for wedges. The majority achieved a satisfactory outcome on the KSS scale (72.2 ± 9.4), with significant differences compared to the previous KSS (54.3 ± 8.9). A score of 31 (12-67) was also obtained on the FJS scale. Postoperative complications were present in 16.7% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>complex prosthetic revision surgery using a rotating hinge prosthesis represents a suitable therapeutic option, yielding appropriate clinical and functional outcomes, albeit not without complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":101296,"journal":{"name":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","volume":"38 3","pages":"149-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35366/115809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: revision joint replacement surgery presents a surgical challenge. The use of rotating hinge prostheses is an option in patients with femorotibial bone defects, ligament insufficiency, or significant deformities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of a series of patients who underwent surgery using the GMK Hinge (Medacta®) rotational hinge model.

Material and methods: a descriptive, retrospective, and analytical study was conducted on a series of 36 patients, with a mean age of 72.5 years (47-85), operated on by the same surgical team between January 2015 and January 2022. The etiology of revision was chronic infection in 38.9% of cases, instability in 33.3%, aseptic loosening in 19.4%, and stiffness in 8.4%. The Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were used to assess functional outcomes. The degree of femorotibial bone defect was evaluated using the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification. Postoperative complications are also recorded.

Results: a total of 36 patients, 17 males and 19 females, were included, with a mean follow-up of 30 months (12-66). Twelve patients had type 1 defects, ten had 2A defects, ten had 2B defects, and two had type 3 defects on the femoral side, with the use of wedges required for asymmetrical defects (21 patients). The predominant tibial defect was type 1 without the need for wedges. The majority achieved a satisfactory outcome on the KSS scale (72.2 ± 9.4), with significant differences compared to the previous KSS (54.3 ± 8.9). A score of 31 (12-67) was also obtained on the FJS scale. Postoperative complications were present in 16.7% of patients.

Conclusions: complex prosthetic revision surgery using a rotating hinge prosthesis represents a suitable therapeutic option, yielding appropriate clinical and functional outcomes, albeit not without complications.

[GMK旋转铰链假体。复杂翻修膝关节假体手术的有效选择]。
导言:翻修关节置换手术是一项外科挑战。对于股胫骨骨缺损、韧带功能不全或严重畸形的患者来说,使用旋转铰链假体是一种选择。本研究旨在评估使用GMK铰链(Medacta®)旋转铰链模型进行手术的一系列患者的临床、功能和放射学结果。材料和方法:本研究对2015年1月至2022年1月期间由同一手术团队进行手术的36例患者进行了描述性、回顾性和分析性研究,这些患者的平均年龄为72.5岁(47-85岁)。翻修病因中,38.9%为慢性感染,33.3%为不稳定,19.4%为无菌性松动,8.4%为僵硬。膝关节社会评分(KSS)和被遗忘关节评分(FJS)用于评估功能结果。股胫骨骨质缺损程度采用安德森骨科研究所(AORI)的分类方法进行评估。结果:共纳入 36 例患者,其中男性 17 例,女性 19 例,平均随访时间为 30 个月(12-66 个月)。其中 12 名患者为 1 型缺损,10 名患者为 2A 型缺损,10 名患者为 2B 型缺损,2 名患者为股骨侧 3 型缺损,不对称缺损患者(21 名)需要使用楔子。胫骨缺损主要为 1 型,无需使用楔形垫。大多数患者的 KSS 评分结果令人满意(72.2±9.4),与之前的 KSS 评分(54.3±8.9)相比差异显著。FJS评分也达到了31分(12-67分)。16.7%的患者出现了术后并发症。结论:使用旋转铰链假体进行复杂的假体翻修手术是一种合适的治疗选择,可获得适当的临床和功能效果,但并非没有并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信