The effect of pre-operative biliary drainage in resectable periampullary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yangjun Li, Tiequan Yang
{"title":"The effect of pre-operative biliary drainage in resectable periampullary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yangjun Li, Tiequan Yang","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.23000318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The effect of a pre-operative biliary stent on complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, and PubMed, Web of Science Knowledge, and Ovid's databases were searched by the end of February 2023. 35 retrospective studies and 2 randomized controlled trials with a total of 12641 patients were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall complication rate of the pre-operative biliary drainage (PBD) group was significantly higher than the no-PBD group (odds ratio [OR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-1.74; p < 0.0001), the incidence of post-operative delayed gastric emptying was increased in patients with PBD compared those with early surgery (OR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02-1.43; p = 0.03), and there was a significant increase in post-operative wound infections in patients receiving PBD with an OR of 2.2 (95% CI: 1.76-2.76; p < 0.00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PBD has no beneficial effect on post-operative outcomes. The increase in post-operative overall complications and wound infections urges the exact indications for PBD and against routine pre-operative biliary decompression, especially for patients with total bilirubin < 250 umol/L waiting for PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93936,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia y cirujanos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia y cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.23000318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The effect of a pre-operative biliary stent on complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains controversial.

Materials and method: We conducted a meta-analysis according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, and PubMed, Web of Science Knowledge, and Ovid's databases were searched by the end of February 2023. 35 retrospective studies and 2 randomized controlled trials with a total of 12641 patients were included.

Results: The overall complication rate of the pre-operative biliary drainage (PBD) group was significantly higher than the no-PBD group (odds ratio [OR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-1.74; p < 0.0001), the incidence of post-operative delayed gastric emptying was increased in patients with PBD compared those with early surgery (OR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02-1.43; p = 0.03), and there was a significant increase in post-operative wound infections in patients receiving PBD with an OR of 2.2 (95% CI: 1.76-2.76; p < 0.00001).

Conclusions: PBD has no beneficial effect on post-operative outcomes. The increase in post-operative overall complications and wound infections urges the exact indications for PBD and against routine pre-operative biliary decompression, especially for patients with total bilirubin < 250 umol/L waiting for PD.

术前胆道引流对可切除胰周病变的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:术前胆道支架对胰十二指肠切除术(PD)后并发症的影响仍存在争议:我们根据系统综述和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行了荟萃分析,并在 2023 年 2 月底之前检索了 PubMed、Web of Science Knowledge 和 Ovid 数据库。共纳入35项回顾性研究和2项随机对照试验,共计12641名患者:结果:术前胆道引流(PBD)组的总并发症发生率明显高于无PBD组(几率比[OR] 1.46,95%置信区间[CI] 1.22-1.74;P < 0.0001),与早期手术患者相比,PBD 患者术后胃排空延迟的发生率增加(OR 1.21,95% CI:1.02-1.43;P = 0.03),接受 PBD 的患者术后伤口感染显著增加,OR 为 2.2(95% CI:1.76-2.76;P < 0.00001).结论:结论:PBD 对术后结果无益。术后总并发症和伤口感染的增加促使人们明确PBD的适应症,反对常规术前胆道减压,尤其是总胆红素< 250 umol/L、等待PD的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信