Early In-Bed Cycle Ergometry in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2400137
Michelle E Kho, Susan Berney, Amy M Pastva, Laurel Kelly, Julie C Reid, Karen E A Burns, Andrew J Seely, Frédérick D'Aragon, Bram Rochwerg, Ian Ball, Alison E Fox-Robichaud, Tim Karachi, Francois Lamontagne, Patrick M Archambault, Jennifer L Tsang, Erick H Duan, John Muscedere, Avelino C Verceles, Karim Serri, Shane W English, Brenda K Reeve, Sangeeta Mehta, Jill C Rudkowski, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Heather K O'Grady, Geoff Strong, Kristy Obrovac, Daana Ajami, Laura Camposilvan, Jean-Eric Tarride, Lehana Thabane, Margaret S Herridge, Deborah J Cook
{"title":"Early In-Bed Cycle Ergometry in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.","authors":"Michelle E Kho, Susan Berney, Amy M Pastva, Laurel Kelly, Julie C Reid, Karen E A Burns, Andrew J Seely, Frédérick D'Aragon, Bram Rochwerg, Ian Ball, Alison E Fox-Robichaud, Tim Karachi, Francois Lamontagne, Patrick M Archambault, Jennifer L Tsang, Erick H Duan, John Muscedere, Avelino C Verceles, Karim Serri, Shane W English, Brenda K Reeve, Sangeeta Mehta, Jill C Rudkowski, Diane Heels-Ansdell, Heather K O'Grady, Geoff Strong, Kristy Obrovac, Daana Ajami, Laura Camposilvan, Jean-Eric Tarride, Lehana Thabane, Margaret S Herridge, Deborah J Cook","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2400137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critical illness requiring invasive mechanical ventilation can precipitate important functional disability, contributing to multidimensional morbidity following admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Early in-bed cycle ergometry added to usual physiotherapy may mitigate ICU-acquired physical function impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned 360 adult ICU patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation to receive 30 minutes of early in-bed Cycling + Usual physiotherapy (n=178) or Usual physiotherapy alone (n=182). The primary outcome was the Physical Function ICU Test-scored (PFIT-s) at 3 days after discharge from the ICU (the score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better function).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cycling began within a median (interquartile range) of 2 (1 to 3) days of starting mechanical ventilation; patients received 3 (2 to 5) cycling sessions for a mean (±standard deviation) of 27.2 ± 6.6 minutes. In both groups, patients started Usual physiotherapy within 2 (2 to 4) days of mechanical ventilation and received 4 (2 to 7) Usual physiotherapy sessions. The duration of Usual physiotherapy was 23.7 ± 15.1 minutes in the Cycling + Usual physiotherapy group and 29.1 ± 13.2 minutes in the Usual physiotherapy group. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Among survivors, the PFIT-s at 3 days after discharge from the ICU was 7.7 ± 1.7 in the Cycling + Usual physiotherapy group and 7.5 ± 1.7 in the Usual physiotherapy group (absolute difference, 0.23 points; 95% confidence interval, -0.19 to 0.65; P=0.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among adults receiving mechanical ventilation in the ICU, adding early in-bed Cycling to usual physiotherapy did not improve physical function at 3 days after discharge from the ICU compared with Usual physiotherapy alone. Cycling did not cause any serious adverse events. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03471247 [full randomized clinical trial] and NCT02377830 [CYCLE Vanguard 46-patient internal pilot].).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":" ","pages":"EVIDoa2400137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Critical illness requiring invasive mechanical ventilation can precipitate important functional disability, contributing to multidimensional morbidity following admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Early in-bed cycle ergometry added to usual physiotherapy may mitigate ICU-acquired physical function impairment.

Methods: We randomly assigned 360 adult ICU patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation to receive 30 minutes of early in-bed Cycling + Usual physiotherapy (n=178) or Usual physiotherapy alone (n=182). The primary outcome was the Physical Function ICU Test-scored (PFIT-s) at 3 days after discharge from the ICU (the score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better function).

Results: Cycling began within a median (interquartile range) of 2 (1 to 3) days of starting mechanical ventilation; patients received 3 (2 to 5) cycling sessions for a mean (±standard deviation) of 27.2 ± 6.6 minutes. In both groups, patients started Usual physiotherapy within 2 (2 to 4) days of mechanical ventilation and received 4 (2 to 7) Usual physiotherapy sessions. The duration of Usual physiotherapy was 23.7 ± 15.1 minutes in the Cycling + Usual physiotherapy group and 29.1 ± 13.2 minutes in the Usual physiotherapy group. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. Among survivors, the PFIT-s at 3 days after discharge from the ICU was 7.7 ± 1.7 in the Cycling + Usual physiotherapy group and 7.5 ± 1.7 in the Usual physiotherapy group (absolute difference, 0.23 points; 95% confidence interval, -0.19 to 0.65; P=0.29).

Conclusions: Among adults receiving mechanical ventilation in the ICU, adding early in-bed Cycling to usual physiotherapy did not improve physical function at 3 days after discharge from the ICU compared with Usual physiotherapy alone. Cycling did not cause any serious adverse events. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03471247 [full randomized clinical trial] and NCT02377830 [CYCLE Vanguard 46-patient internal pilot].).

机械通气患者的早期床上循环测力。
背景:需要侵入性机械通气的重症患者在入住重症监护室(ICU)后可能会出现严重的功能障碍,导致多方面的发病率。在常规物理治疗的基础上,尽早进行床上周期性锻炼可减轻重症监护室获得性身体功能损伤:我们随机分配了 360 名接受有创机械通气的 ICU 成年患者,让他们接受 30 分钟的早期床上自行车运动 + 常规物理治疗(178 人)或单独的常规物理治疗(182 人)。主要结果是重症监护室出院后3天的身体功能重症监护室测试评分(PFIT-s)(评分范围为0至10分,分数越高表示功能越好):患者在开始机械通气的中位数(四分位间距)为 2(1 至 3)天内开始骑自行车;患者接受了 3(2 至 5)次骑自行车训练,平均(± 标准差)时间为 27.2 ± 6.6 分钟。两组患者均在机械通气后 2(2 至 4)天内开始接受常规物理治疗,并接受 4(2 至 7)次常规物理治疗。骑自行车+常规物理治疗组的常规物理治疗时间为(23.7 ± 15.1)分钟,常规物理治疗组为(29.1 ± 13.2)分钟。两组均未发生严重不良事件。在幸存者中,从重症监护室出院 3 天后的 PFIT-s 值为:骑自行车 + 常规物理治疗组为 7.7 ± 1.7,常规物理治疗组为 7.5 ± 1.7(绝对差异,0.23 分;95% 置信区间,-0.19 至 0.65;P=0.29):在重症监护室接受机械通气的成人中,与单纯的常规物理治疗相比,在重症监护室出院 3 天后,在常规物理治疗的基础上增加早期床上单车运动并不能改善身体功能。骑自行车不会导致任何严重不良事件。(由加拿大健康研究所等机构资助;ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT03471247 [完整随机临床试验] 和 NCT02377830 [CYCLE Vanguard 46 名患者内部试验])。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信