{"title":"Nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy dataset(NDRD): A database for diabetic retinopathy screening research and deep learning evaluation.","authors":"Xing Liang, Haiqi Wen, Yajian Duan, Kan He, Xiufang Feng, Guohong Zhou","doi":"10.1177/14604582241259328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this article, we provide a database of nonproliferative diabetes retinopathy, which focuses on early diabetes retinopathy with hard exudation, and further explore its clinical application in disease recognition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collect the photos of nonproliferative diabetes retinopathy taken by Optos Panoramic 200 laser scanning ophthalmoscope, filter out the pictures with poor quality, and label the hard exudative lesions in the images under the guidance of professional medical personnel. To validate the effectiveness of the datasets, five deep learning models are used to perform learning predictions on the datasets. Furthermore, we evaluate the performance of the model using evaluation metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nonproliferative diabetes retinopathy is smaller than proliferative retinopathy and more difficult to identify. The existing segmentation models have poor lesion segmentation performance, while the intersection over union (<i>IOU</i>) value for deep lesion segmentation of models targeting small lesions can reach 66.12%, which is higher than ordinary lesion segmentation models, but there is still a lot of room for improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The segmentation of small hard exudative lesions is more challenging than that of large hard exudative lesions. More targeted datasets are needed for model training. Compared with the previous diabetes retina datasets, the NDRD dataset pays more attention to micro lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"30 2","pages":"14604582241259328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241259328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: In this article, we provide a database of nonproliferative diabetes retinopathy, which focuses on early diabetes retinopathy with hard exudation, and further explore its clinical application in disease recognition.
Methods: We collect the photos of nonproliferative diabetes retinopathy taken by Optos Panoramic 200 laser scanning ophthalmoscope, filter out the pictures with poor quality, and label the hard exudative lesions in the images under the guidance of professional medical personnel. To validate the effectiveness of the datasets, five deep learning models are used to perform learning predictions on the datasets. Furthermore, we evaluate the performance of the model using evaluation metrics.
Results: Nonproliferative diabetes retinopathy is smaller than proliferative retinopathy and more difficult to identify. The existing segmentation models have poor lesion segmentation performance, while the intersection over union (IOU) value for deep lesion segmentation of models targeting small lesions can reach 66.12%, which is higher than ordinary lesion segmentation models, but there is still a lot of room for improvement.
Conclusion: The segmentation of small hard exudative lesions is more challenging than that of large hard exudative lesions. More targeted datasets are needed for model training. Compared with the previous diabetes retina datasets, the NDRD dataset pays more attention to micro lesions.
期刊介绍:
Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.