Skin cancer screening recommendations by U.S. cancer centers: Inconsistency with national guidelines.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Joyce Lee, Lynn K Han, Luc G T Morris, Deborah Korenstein, Jennifer L Marti
{"title":"Skin cancer screening recommendations by U.S. cancer centers: Inconsistency with national guidelines.","authors":"Joyce Lee, Lynn K Han, Luc G T Morris, Deborah Korenstein, Jennifer L Marti","doi":"10.1177/09691413241259991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The incidence of melanoma has increased dramatically over the past four decades, while overall mortality has remained stable. This increase in incidence without a change in overall mortality may be due to overdiagnosis through skin cancer screening. Despite the USPSTF citing insufficient evidence for or against professional skin cancer screening in average-risk adults, U.S. skin cancer screening practices may be leading to overdiagnosis of skin cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two reviewers examined the online recommendations for skin cancer screening of 1113 U.S. cancer centers accredited by the Commission on Cancer, including 66 designated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Recommendations on skin cancer screening, such as age, frequency, and patient population (i.e. high-risk of developing skin cancer, \"people of color\") were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 18% of centers (202) recommended professional screening in average-risk adults, 35.8% (399) advised regular self-examination, and only 3.4% (38) cited insufficient evidence for screening practices; 49% of NCI centers (32/66) recommended screening in high-risk adults compared to 13% of non-NCI centers (135/1047; <i>p</i> = 0.0004); 0.45% of centers (5) mentioned the potential harms of screening, while 3.5% (39) specifically recommended screening for people of color.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study reveals that many U.S. cancer centers advise some form of skin cancer screening despite a lack of evidence for or against these practices. Few centers mentioned the potential harms of screening, including overdiagnosis. This indicates a need for stronger evidence for specific screening guidelines and for greater public awareness of the potential benefits and harms of routine skin cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413241259991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The incidence of melanoma has increased dramatically over the past four decades, while overall mortality has remained stable. This increase in incidence without a change in overall mortality may be due to overdiagnosis through skin cancer screening. Despite the USPSTF citing insufficient evidence for or against professional skin cancer screening in average-risk adults, U.S. skin cancer screening practices may be leading to overdiagnosis of skin cancers.

Methods: Two reviewers examined the online recommendations for skin cancer screening of 1113 U.S. cancer centers accredited by the Commission on Cancer, including 66 designated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Recommendations on skin cancer screening, such as age, frequency, and patient population (i.e. high-risk of developing skin cancer, "people of color") were documented.

Results: We found that 18% of centers (202) recommended professional screening in average-risk adults, 35.8% (399) advised regular self-examination, and only 3.4% (38) cited insufficient evidence for screening practices; 49% of NCI centers (32/66) recommended screening in high-risk adults compared to 13% of non-NCI centers (135/1047; p = 0.0004); 0.45% of centers (5) mentioned the potential harms of screening, while 3.5% (39) specifically recommended screening for people of color.

Conclusion: Our study reveals that many U.S. cancer centers advise some form of skin cancer screening despite a lack of evidence for or against these practices. Few centers mentioned the potential harms of screening, including overdiagnosis. This indicates a need for stronger evidence for specific screening guidelines and for greater public awareness of the potential benefits and harms of routine skin cancer screening.

美国癌症中心的皮肤癌筛查建议:与国家指导方针不一致。
目的:在过去的四十年里,黑色素瘤的发病率急剧上升,而总死亡率却保持稳定。发病率增加而总死亡率却没有变化,这可能是由于皮肤癌筛查过度诊断造成的。尽管美国皮肤癌筛查基金会(USPSTF)指出,支持或反对对普通风险成人进行专业皮肤癌筛查的证据不足,但美国的皮肤癌筛查做法可能会导致皮肤癌的过度诊断:两位评审员研究了美国癌症委员会认可的 1113 家癌症中心(包括美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)指定的 66 家癌症中心)的在线皮肤癌筛查建议。他们记录了皮肤癌筛查的建议,如年龄、频率和患者人群(即皮肤癌高风险人群、"有色人种"):我们发现,18%的中心(202 家)建议对一般风险的成年人进行专业筛查,35.8%的中心(399 家)建议定期进行自我检查,只有 3.4%的中心(38 家)提到筛查做法的证据不足;49%的 NCI 中心(32/66 家)建议对高风险成年人进行筛查,而非 NCI 中心的比例为 13%(135/1047;P = 0.0004);0.45% 的中心(5 家)提到筛查的潜在危害,而 3.5%的中心(39 家)特别建议对有色人种进行筛查:我们的研究显示,尽管缺乏支持或反对皮肤癌筛查的证据,但许多美国癌症中心仍建议进行某种形式的皮肤癌筛查。很少有中心提到筛查的潜在危害,包括过度诊断。这表明需要更有力的证据来制定具体的筛查指南,并提高公众对常规皮肤癌筛查潜在益处和危害的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信