Anwendbarkeit eines Screening-Instruments für die Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung bei Erwachsenen (ASRS-5) in der Hausarztpraxis – eine qualitative Studie

IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
{"title":"Anwendbarkeit eines Screening-Instruments für die Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung bei Erwachsenen (ASRS-5) in der Hausarztpraxis – eine qualitative Studie","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of the study was to explore the subjective views of general practitioners on the applicability of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Screening Scale for DSM-5 (ASRS-5) as a screening tool for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults in general practice.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Eleven general practitioners, who had participated in the validation study of the German version of the ASRS-5, were interviewed. For this purpose, a semi-structured interview guide was designed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ASRS-5 seems to work well in general medical practice. But there is evidence for a lack of knowledge about ADHD in adults among general practitioners and a demand for further training in this area. Moreover, insufficient possibilities for subsequent treatment after a positive ADHD screening were claimed.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>In general medicine, the introduction of a screening using ASRS-5 in cases of clinical suspicion could be the first step towards improving the management of adult patients with ADHD.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Optimizing the management of adults with ADHD requires additional information and training initiatives to support early diagnosis especially in the primary care setting, and to reveal treatment options and care concepts for adults with ADHD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"188 ","pages":"Pages 41-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000886/pdfft?md5=c0ad5e9b73aca1e48d31bff3b9947017&pid=1-s2.0-S1865921724000886-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the study was to explore the subjective views of general practitioners on the applicability of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Screening Scale for DSM-5 (ASRS-5) as a screening tool for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults in general practice.

Method

Eleven general practitioners, who had participated in the validation study of the German version of the ASRS-5, were interviewed. For this purpose, a semi-structured interview guide was designed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz.

Results

The ASRS-5 seems to work well in general medical practice. But there is evidence for a lack of knowledge about ADHD in adults among general practitioners and a demand for further training in this area. Moreover, insufficient possibilities for subsequent treatment after a positive ADHD screening were claimed.

Discussion

In general medicine, the introduction of a screening using ASRS-5 in cases of clinical suspicion could be the first step towards improving the management of adult patients with ADHD.

Conclusion

Optimizing the management of adults with ADHD requires additional information and training initiatives to support early diagnosis especially in the primary care setting, and to reveal treatment options and care concepts for adults with ADHD.

[成人注意缺陷/多动障碍筛查工具(ASRS-5)在全科诊疗中的可行性:定性研究]。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨全科医生对 DSM-5 成人多动症自我报告筛查量表(ASRS-5)作为全科医生筛查成人注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)工具的适用性的主观看法:方法:访问了 11 名曾参与 ASRS-5 德文版验证研究的全科医生。为此,采用实施研究综合框架 (CFIR) 设计了半结构化访谈指南。对访谈进行了录音、转录,并根据 Kuckartz 的方法使用定性内容分析法进行了分析:结果:ASRS-5 似乎在普通医疗实践中效果良好。但有证据表明,全科医生对成人多动症缺乏了解,需要在这方面接受进一步培训。此外,有人认为在多动症筛查结果呈阳性后进行后续治疗的可能性不足:讨论:在全科医学中,在临床怀疑病例中采用 ASRS-5 进行筛查可能是改善成人多动症患者管理的第一步:结论:优化成人多动症患者的管理需要更多的信息和培训措施,以支持早期诊断(尤其是在初级医疗机构),并揭示成人多动症患者的治疗方案和护理理念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信