Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Quality of Care Among Medicaid Beneficiaries With Schizophrenia.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sharon-Lise Normand, Katya Zelevinsky, Molly Finnerty, Emily Leckman-Westin, Qingxian Chen, Junghye Jeong, Haley Abing, Jeannette Tsuei, Marcela Horvitz-Lennon
{"title":"Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Quality of Care Among Medicaid Beneficiaries With Schizophrenia.","authors":"Sharon-Lise Normand, Katya Zelevinsky, Molly Finnerty, Emily Leckman-Westin, Qingxian Chen, Junghye Jeong, Haley Abing, Jeannette Tsuei, Marcela Horvitz-Lennon","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20230564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors sought to update and expand the evidence on the quality of health care and disparities in care among Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult beneficiaries of New York State Medicaid with schizophrenia receiving care during 2016-2019 were identified. Composite quality scores were derived from item response theory models by using evidence-based indicators of the quality of mental and general medical health care. Risk-adjusted racial-ethnic differences in quality were estimated and summarized as percentiles relative to White beneficiaries' mean quality scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 71,013 beneficiaries; 42.8% were Black, 22.9% Latinx, 27.4% White, and 6.9% other race-ethnicity. Overall, 68.8% had a mental health follow-up within 30 days of discharge, and 90.2% had no preventable hospitalizations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. Among beneficiaries receiving antipsychotic medications, medication adherence was adequate for 43.7%. Fourteen indicators for mental and general medical health care quality yielded three composites: two for mental health care (pharmacological and ambulatory) and one for acute mental and general medical health care. Mean quality of pharmacological mental health care for Black and Latinx beneficiaries was lower than for White beneficiaries (39th and 44th percentile, respectively). For Black beneficiaries, mean quality of ambulatory mental health care was also lower (46th percentile). In New York City, Black beneficiaries received lower-quality care in all domains. The only meaningful group difference in the quality of acute mental and general medical health care indicated higher-quality care for individuals with other race-ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities in the quality of Medicaid-financed health care persist, particularly for Black beneficiaries. Regional differences merit further attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20230564","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The authors sought to update and expand the evidence on the quality of health care and disparities in care among Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia.

Methods: Adult beneficiaries of New York State Medicaid with schizophrenia receiving care during 2016-2019 were identified. Composite quality scores were derived from item response theory models by using evidence-based indicators of the quality of mental and general medical health care. Risk-adjusted racial-ethnic differences in quality were estimated and summarized as percentiles relative to White beneficiaries' mean quality scores.

Results: The study included 71,013 beneficiaries; 42.8% were Black, 22.9% Latinx, 27.4% White, and 6.9% other race-ethnicity. Overall, 68.8% had a mental health follow-up within 30 days of discharge, and 90.2% had no preventable hospitalizations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. Among beneficiaries receiving antipsychotic medications, medication adherence was adequate for 43.7%. Fourteen indicators for mental and general medical health care quality yielded three composites: two for mental health care (pharmacological and ambulatory) and one for acute mental and general medical health care. Mean quality of pharmacological mental health care for Black and Latinx beneficiaries was lower than for White beneficiaries (39th and 44th percentile, respectively). For Black beneficiaries, mean quality of ambulatory mental health care was also lower (46th percentile). In New York City, Black beneficiaries received lower-quality care in all domains. The only meaningful group difference in the quality of acute mental and general medical health care indicated higher-quality care for individuals with other race-ethnicity.

Conclusions: Disparities in the quality of Medicaid-financed health care persist, particularly for Black beneficiaries. Regional differences merit further attention.

患有精神分裂症的医疗补助受益人在护理质量方面的种族-民族差异。
目的作者试图更新和扩展有关精神分裂症医疗补助受益人的医疗质量和护理差异的证据:对 2016-2019 年期间接受治疗的患有精神分裂症的纽约州医疗补助(Medicaid)成人受益人进行了鉴定。通过使用精神和普通医疗保健质量的循证指标,从项目反应理论模型中得出综合质量分数。估算了经风险调整后的种族-民族质量差异,并总结为相对于白人受益人平均质量得分的百分位数:研究包括 71 013 名受益人;42.8% 为黑人,22.9% 为拉丁裔,27.4% 为白人,6.9% 为其他种族。总体而言,68.8%的受益人在出院后30天内进行了心理健康随访,90.2%的受益人没有因慢性阻塞性肺病或哮喘而住院。在接受抗精神病药物治疗的受益人中,43.7%的人服药依从性良好。精神和普通医疗保健质量的 14 项指标产生了三项复合指标:两项针对精神医疗保健(药物治疗和非住院治疗),一项针对急性精神和普通医疗保健。黑人和拉美裔受益人的药物心理保健平均质量低于白人受益人(分别为第 39 位和第 44 位)。对于黑人受益人而言,非住院精神保健护理的平均质量也较低(第 46 位)。在纽约市,黑人受益人在所有领域获得的护理质量都较低。在急性精神疾病和普通医疗保健的质量方面,唯一有意义的群体差异表明,其他种族-人种的医疗保健质量较高:结论:医疗补助计划资助的医疗质量差异依然存在,尤其是对黑人受益人而言。地区差异值得进一步关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatric services
Psychiatric services 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
295
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信