Lower Risks of New-Onset Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus DPP4 Inhibitors.

IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oscar Hou In Chou, Jing Ning, Raymond Ngai Chiu Chan, Cheuk To Chung, Helen Huang, Kenrick Ng, Edward Christopher Dee, Sharen Lee, Apichat Kaewdech, Ariel K Man Chow, Nancy Kwan Man, Tong Liu, Fengshi Jing, Bernard Man Yung Cheung, Gary Tse, Jiandong Zhou
{"title":"Lower Risks of New-Onset Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus DPP4 Inhibitors.","authors":"Oscar Hou In Chou, Jing Ning, Raymond Ngai Chiu Chan, Cheuk To Chung, Helen Huang, Kenrick Ng, Edward Christopher Dee, Sharen Lee, Apichat Kaewdech, Ariel K Man Chow, Nancy Kwan Man, Tong Liu, Fengshi Jing, Bernard Man Yung Cheung, Gary Tse, Jiandong Zhou","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2023.7118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may be a risk factor for development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The association between risk of developing HCC and treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) is currently unknown. This study aimed to compare the risk of new-onset HCC in patients treated with SGLT2i versus DPP4i.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with T2DM in Hong Kong receiving either SGLT2i or DPP4i between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Patients with concurrent DPP4i and SGLT2i use were excluded. Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) was performed by using the nearest neighbor search. Multivariable Cox regression was applied to identify significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 62,699 patients were included (SGLT2i, n=22,154; DPP4i, n=40,545). After matching (n=44,308), 166 patients (0.37%) developed HCC: 36 in the SGLT2i group and 130 in the DPP4i group over 240,269 person-years. Overall, SGLT2i use was associated with lower risks of HCC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.28-0.79) compared with DPP4i after adjustments. The association between SGLT2i and HCC development remained significant in patients with cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis (HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04-0.41), hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17-0.59), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.80). The results were consistent in different risk models, propensity score approaches, and sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SGLT2i use was associated with a lower risk of HCC compared with DPP4i use after adjustments, and in the context of cirrhosis, advanced fibrosis, HBV infection, and HCV infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"22 2D","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2023.7118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may be a risk factor for development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The association between risk of developing HCC and treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) is currently unknown. This study aimed to compare the risk of new-onset HCC in patients treated with SGLT2i versus DPP4i.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with T2DM in Hong Kong receiving either SGLT2i or DPP4i between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Patients with concurrent DPP4i and SGLT2i use were excluded. Propensity score matching (1:1 ratio) was performed by using the nearest neighbor search. Multivariable Cox regression was applied to identify significant predictors.

Results: A total of 62,699 patients were included (SGLT2i, n=22,154; DPP4i, n=40,545). After matching (n=44,308), 166 patients (0.37%) developed HCC: 36 in the SGLT2i group and 130 in the DPP4i group over 240,269 person-years. Overall, SGLT2i use was associated with lower risks of HCC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.28-0.79) compared with DPP4i after adjustments. The association between SGLT2i and HCC development remained significant in patients with cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis (HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04-0.41), hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17-0.59), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.80). The results were consistent in different risk models, propensity score approaches, and sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: SGLT2i use was associated with a lower risk of HCC compared with DPP4i use after adjustments, and in the context of cirrhosis, advanced fibrosis, HBV infection, and HCV infection.

使用 SGLT2 抑制剂和 DPP4 抑制剂治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者罹患新发肝细胞癌的风险更低。
背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)可能是肝细胞癌(HCC)发病的一个风险因素。目前尚不清楚HCC发病风险与钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4i)治疗之间的关系。本研究旨在比较接受 SGLT2i 和 DPP4i 治疗的患者新发 HCC 的风险:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2015年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间接受SGLT2i或DPP4i治疗的香港T2DM患者。排除了同时使用 DPP4i 和 SGLT2i 的患者。采用近邻搜索法进行倾向评分匹配(1:1 比例)。采用多变量 Cox 回归确定重要的预测因素:共纳入 62,699 名患者(SGLT2i,n=22,154;DPP4i,n=40,545)。配对后(n=44,308),在 240,269 人年中,166 名患者(0.37%)患上了 HCC:SGLT2i 组 36 人,DPP4i 组 130 人。总体而言,经调整后,与 DPP4i 相比,使用 SGLT2i 可降低 HCC 风险(危险比 [HR],0.42;95% CI,0.28-0.79)。在肝硬化或晚期肝纤维化(HR,0.12;95% CI,0.04-0.41)、乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染(HR,0.32;95% CI,0.17-0.59)或丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染(HR,0.41;95% CI,0.22-0.80)患者中,SGLT2i 与 HCC 发生之间的关系仍然显著。不同的风险模型、倾向评分方法和敏感性分析结果一致:结论:经调整后,在肝硬化、晚期肝纤维化、HBV 感染和 HCV 感染的情况下,与使用 DPP4i 相比,使用 SGLT2i 与较低的 HCC 风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信