Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the KangDuo Surgical System Versus the da Vinci Si System: A Prospective, Double-center, Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Cheng Shen, Weigang Yan, Silu Chen, Weifeng Xu, Xiang Wang, Jie Dong, Zhongyuan Zhang, Kunlin Yang, Shubo Fan, Zhihua Li, Xu Chen, Meng Zhang, Zaoheng Jin, Yisen Meng, Lin Cai, Kai Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Li Mu, Zhigang Ji, Liqun Zhou, Xuesong Li
{"title":"Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the KangDuo Surgical System Versus the da Vinci Si System: A Prospective, Double-center, Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Cheng Shen, Weigang Yan, Silu Chen, Weifeng Xu, Xiang Wang, Jie Dong, Zhongyuan Zhang, Kunlin Yang, Shubo Fan, Zhihua Li, Xu Chen, Meng Zhang, Zaoheng Jin, Yisen Meng, Lin Cai, Kai Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Li Mu, Zhigang Ji, Liqun Zhou, Xuesong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2024.05.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The KangDuo Surgical Robot (KD-SR) is a newly developed surgical robot.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the KD-SR with those of the da Vinci Si Surgical System (DV-SS-Si).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A prospective double-center noninferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted among 18-75-yr-old patients with suspected T1-2N0M0 prostate cancer (PCa) scheduled for RARP.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>RARP with the KD-SR (KD-RARP) versus RARP with the DV-SS-Si (DV-RARP).</p><p><strong>Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: </strong>The primary outcome was surgical success, defined as follows: surgery can be performed according to the established protocol, without switching to other surgical modalities, and without secondary surgery due to surgical complications after surgery. The secondary outcome was short-term functional and oncological outcomes. The noninferiority threshold was set at 10%.</p><p><strong>Results and limitations: </strong>Eighty patients were enrolled, while the full analysis set finally included 79 patients (40 with KD-RARP and 39 with DV-RARP). The success rate was 100% in both groups. We could not find differences in urinary continence rate at 1, 2, 3, and 4 wk after catheter removal between the groups (p > 0.05). The rate of Clavien-Dindo grade II adverse events was 20% in the KD-RARP group and 17.9% in the DV-RARP group (p = 0.82), and no grade ≥III adverse events occurred. The median operation time was significantly longer in the KD-RARP group than in the DV-RARP group (177.5 vs 145 min, p = 0.012). The main limitations were the short follow-up period and that survival was not considered as the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The KD-SR is a viable option for RARP, with acceptable short-term outcomes compared with the DV-SS-Si for T1-2 PCa.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>This is the first prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the KangDuo Surgical Robot (KD-SR) versus the da Vinci Si Surgical System (DV-SS-Si) for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, which determines that the KD-SR is noninferior to the DV-SS-Si regarding safety and efficacy for T1-T2 prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.05.023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The KangDuo Surgical Robot (KD-SR) is a newly developed surgical robot.

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the KD-SR with those of the da Vinci Si Surgical System (DV-SS-Si).

Design, setting, and participants: A prospective double-center noninferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted among 18-75-yr-old patients with suspected T1-2N0M0 prostate cancer (PCa) scheduled for RARP.

Intervention: RARP with the KD-SR (KD-RARP) versus RARP with the DV-SS-Si (DV-RARP).

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary outcome was surgical success, defined as follows: surgery can be performed according to the established protocol, without switching to other surgical modalities, and without secondary surgery due to surgical complications after surgery. The secondary outcome was short-term functional and oncological outcomes. The noninferiority threshold was set at 10%.

Results and limitations: Eighty patients were enrolled, while the full analysis set finally included 79 patients (40 with KD-RARP and 39 with DV-RARP). The success rate was 100% in both groups. We could not find differences in urinary continence rate at 1, 2, 3, and 4 wk after catheter removal between the groups (p > 0.05). The rate of Clavien-Dindo grade II adverse events was 20% in the KD-RARP group and 17.9% in the DV-RARP group (p = 0.82), and no grade ≥III adverse events occurred. The median operation time was significantly longer in the KD-RARP group than in the DV-RARP group (177.5 vs 145 min, p = 0.012). The main limitations were the short follow-up period and that survival was not considered as the primary outcome.

Conclusions: The KD-SR is a viable option for RARP, with acceptable short-term outcomes compared with the DV-SS-Si for T1-2 PCa.

Patient summary: This is the first prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the KangDuo Surgical Robot (KD-SR) versus the da Vinci Si Surgical System (DV-SS-Si) for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, which determines that the KD-SR is noninferior to the DV-SS-Si regarding safety and efficacy for T1-T2 prostate cancer.

康多手术系统与达芬奇Si系统的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:一项前瞻性双中心随机对照试验。
背景:康朵手术机器人(KD-SR)是一种新开发的手术机器人:康多手术机器人(KD-SR)是一种新开发的手术机器人:目的:比较使用KD-SR和达芬奇Si手术系统(DV-SS-Si)的机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)的安全性和有效性:前瞻性双中心非劣效性随机对照试验在18-75岁的疑似T1-2N0M0前列腺癌(PCa)患者中进行:干预措施:使用 KD-SR 的 RARP(KD-RARP)与使用 DV-SS-Si 的 RARP(DV-RARP):主要结果是手术成功率,定义如下:手术可以按照既定方案进行,无需改用其他手术方式,术后也不会因手术并发症而进行二次手术。次要结果为短期功能和肿瘤学结果。非劣效性阈值设定为10%:共有 80 名患者入组,而完整的分析集最终包括 79 名患者(40 名 KD-RARP 患者和 39 名 DV-RARP 患者)。两组患者的成功率均为 100%。在拔除导尿管后的 1、2、3 和 4 周内,我们没有发现两组患者的尿失禁率存在差异(P > 0.05)。KD-RARP 组的 Clavien-Dindo II 级不良事件发生率为 20%,DV-RARP 组为 17.9%(P = 0.82),无≥III 级不良事件发生。KD-RARP 组的中位手术时间明显长于 DV-RARP 组(177.5 分钟 vs 145 分钟,p = 0.012)。结论:KD-RARP是一种可行的手术方法,但它也存在一些局限性:患者总结:这是首例比较康多手术机器人(KD-SR)与达芬奇Si手术系统(DV-SS-Si)的前瞻性随机对照试验,用于机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术,结果表明KD-SR在治疗T1-T2前列腺癌的安全性和有效性方面不逊于DV-SS-Si。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信