Operative Time Associated With Increased Length of Stay After Single-level Cervical Disk Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 3681 Surgeries.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mitchell K Ng, Olivia Tracey, Nikhil Vasireddi, Ahmed Emara, Aaron Lam, Ian J Wellington, Brian Ford, Nicholas U Ahn, John K Houten, Ahmed Saleh, Afshin E Razi
{"title":"Operative Time Associated With Increased Length of Stay After Single-level Cervical Disk Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 3681 Surgeries.","authors":"Mitchell K Ng, Olivia Tracey, Nikhil Vasireddi, Ahmed Emara, Aaron Lam, Ian J Wellington, Brian Ford, Nicholas U Ahn, John K Houten, Ahmed Saleh, Afshin E Razi","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Level III evidence-retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to (1) determine whether longer CDA operative time increases the risk of 30-day postoperative complications, (2) analyze the association between operative time and subsequent health care utilization, and (3) discharge disposition.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) most commonly serves as an alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to treat cervical spine disease, however, with only 1600 CDAs performed annually relative to 132,000 ACDFs, it is a relatively novel procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective query was performed identifying patients who underwent single-level CDA between January 2012 and December 2018 using a nationwide database. Differences in baseline patient demographics were identified through univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify associations between operative time (reference: 81-100 min), medical/surgical complications, and health care utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3681 cases were performed, with a mean patient age of 45.52 years and operative time of 107.72±49.6 minutes. Higher odds of length of stay were demonstrated starting with operative time category 101-120 minutes (odds ratio: 2.164, 95% CI: 1.247-3.754, P=0.006); however, not among discharge destination, 30-day unplanned readmission, or reoperation. Operative time <40 minutes was associated with 10.7x odds of nonhome discharge, while >240 minutes was associated with 4.4 times higher odds of LOS>2 days (P<0.01). Increased operative time was not associated with higher odds of wound complication/infection, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, or urinary tract infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prolonged CDA operative time above the reference 81-100 minutes is independently associated with increased length of stay, but not other significant health care utilization parameters, including discharge disposition, readmission, or reoperation. There was no association between prolonged operative time and 30-day medical/surgical complications, including wound complications, infections, pulmonary embolism, or urinary tract infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Level III evidence-retrospective cohort.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to (1) determine whether longer CDA operative time increases the risk of 30-day postoperative complications, (2) analyze the association between operative time and subsequent health care utilization, and (3) discharge disposition.

Background: Cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) most commonly serves as an alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to treat cervical spine disease, however, with only 1600 CDAs performed annually relative to 132,000 ACDFs, it is a relatively novel procedure.

Methods: A retrospective query was performed identifying patients who underwent single-level CDA between January 2012 and December 2018 using a nationwide database. Differences in baseline patient demographics were identified through univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify associations between operative time (reference: 81-100 min), medical/surgical complications, and health care utilization.

Results: A total of 3681 cases were performed, with a mean patient age of 45.52 years and operative time of 107.72±49.6 minutes. Higher odds of length of stay were demonstrated starting with operative time category 101-120 minutes (odds ratio: 2.164, 95% CI: 1.247-3.754, P=0.006); however, not among discharge destination, 30-day unplanned readmission, or reoperation. Operative time <40 minutes was associated with 10.7x odds of nonhome discharge, while >240 minutes was associated with 4.4 times higher odds of LOS>2 days (P<0.01). Increased operative time was not associated with higher odds of wound complication/infection, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, or urinary tract infections.

Conclusions: Prolonged CDA operative time above the reference 81-100 minutes is independently associated with increased length of stay, but not other significant health care utilization parameters, including discharge disposition, readmission, or reoperation. There was no association between prolonged operative time and 30-day medical/surgical complications, including wound complications, infections, pulmonary embolism, or urinary tract infection.

手术时间与单层颈椎间盘置换术后住院时间延长有关:对 3681 例手术的分析。
研究设计III 级证据--回顾性队列:本研究的目的是:(1)确定较长的 CDA 手术时间是否会增加术后 30 天并发症的风险;(2)分析手术时间与后续医疗保健使用之间的关联;以及(3)出院处置:背景:颈椎间盘关节置换术(CDA)最常用来替代颈椎前路椎间盘切除及融合术(ACDF)治疗颈椎病,然而,相对于每年进行的132,000例ACDF手术,CDA手术仅有1600例,是一种相对新颖的手术:利用全国性数据库对2012年1月至2018年12月期间接受单水平CDA的患者进行了回顾性查询。通过单变量分析确定了患者基线人口统计学特征的差异。进行了多变量逻辑回归,以确定手术时间(参考值:81-100 分钟)、内科/外科并发症和医疗利用率之间的关联:结果:共进行了 3681 例手术,患者平均年龄为 45.52 岁,手术时间为 107.72±49.6 分钟。手术时间为 101-120 分钟的患者住院时间较长(几率比:2.164,95% CI:1.247-3.754,P=0.006);但出院目的地、30 天非计划再入院或再次手术的患者住院时间较短。手术时间 240 分钟与 LOS>2 天的几率高出 4.4 倍有关(结论:CDA 手术时间延长与 LOS>2 天的几率高出 4.4 倍有关:CDA手术时间延长超过参考值81-100分钟与住院时间延长有独立相关性,但与出院处置、再入院或再次手术等其他重要医疗利用参数无关。手术时间延长与 30 天内医疗/手术并发症(包括伤口并发症、感染、肺栓塞或尿路感染)之间没有关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信