Are there differences between patients with unifocal nummular headache and those who progress to bifocal nummular headache? A retrospective observational study.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1111/head.14751
Gonçalo Cabral, Miguel Serôdio, Danna Krupka, Vitor Mendes Ferreira, Sofia Calado, Miguel V Baptista
{"title":"Are there differences between patients with unifocal nummular headache and those who progress to bifocal nummular headache? A retrospective observational study.","authors":"Gonçalo Cabral, Miguel Serôdio, Danna Krupka, Vitor Mendes Ferreira, Sofia Calado, Miguel V Baptista","doi":"10.1111/head.14751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This retrospective observational cohort study aimed to compare clinical characteristics and treatment responses in patients exclusively experiencing unifocal nummular headache (NH) with those who develop the bifocal variant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with NH who attended a neurology (headache) outpatient clinic between January 2018 and December 2022. The cohort was divided into two groups: Group 1, exclusive unifocal NH; and Group 2, those developing a secondary focal area of pain, i.e., bifocal NH. Data were collected on demographic characteristics, clinical features, other headache comorbidities, and treatment-related information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 patients were included in this study: 12 were categorized as unifocal NH (Group 1) and 11 as bifocal NH (Group 2). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics, clinical features, or treatment response. Nonetheless, patients with bifocal NH exhibited spontaneous remission rates in the first pain area when compared to the unifocal NH group, with statistically significant differences (36% vs. 0%, p = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our sample, patients with bifocal NH demonstrated spontaneous remission rates in the initial pain area, a phenomenon not observed in patients with unifocal NH. It is worth noting the limited sample size in the present study, highlighting the need for larger cohorts to validate and further explore our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"1065-1068"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14751","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This retrospective observational cohort study aimed to compare clinical characteristics and treatment responses in patients exclusively experiencing unifocal nummular headache (NH) with those who develop the bifocal variant.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with NH who attended a neurology (headache) outpatient clinic between January 2018 and December 2022. The cohort was divided into two groups: Group 1, exclusive unifocal NH; and Group 2, those developing a secondary focal area of pain, i.e., bifocal NH. Data were collected on demographic characteristics, clinical features, other headache comorbidities, and treatment-related information.

Results: A total of 23 patients were included in this study: 12 were categorized as unifocal NH (Group 1) and 11 as bifocal NH (Group 2). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics, clinical features, or treatment response. Nonetheless, patients with bifocal NH exhibited spontaneous remission rates in the first pain area when compared to the unifocal NH group, with statistically significant differences (36% vs. 0%, p = 0.020).

Conclusion: In our sample, patients with bifocal NH demonstrated spontaneous remission rates in the initial pain area, a phenomenon not observed in patients with unifocal NH. It is worth noting the limited sample size in the present study, highlighting the need for larger cohorts to validate and further explore our findings.

单焦麻木性头痛患者与发展为双焦麻木性头痛的患者之间存在差异吗?一项回顾性观察研究。
目的:这项回顾性队列观察研究旨在比较单焦头痛患者和双焦头痛患者的临床特征和治疗反应:这项回顾性观察队列研究旨在比较单焦点麻木性头痛(NH)患者与双焦点变异型患者的临床特征和治疗反应:该研究对2018年1月至2022年12月期间在神经病学(头痛)门诊就诊的被诊断为NH的患者进行了回顾性研究。研究对象分为两组:第1组为单灶NH患者;第2组为出现继发性疼痛灶的患者,即双灶NH患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学特征、临床特征、其他头痛合并症以及治疗相关信息:结果:本研究共纳入 23 名患者:结果:本研究共纳入 23 例患者:12 例被归为单焦性 NH(第 1 组),11 例被归为双焦性 NH(第 2 组)。两组患者在人口统计学特征、临床特征和治疗反应方面均无差异。然而,与单焦点 NH 组相比,双焦点 NH 患者在第一个疼痛区域的自发缓解率具有显著的统计学差异(36% 对 0%,P = 0.020):在我们的样本中,双焦点 NH 患者在最初疼痛区域的自发缓解率较高,而在单焦点 NH 患者中未观察到这一现象。值得注意的是,本研究的样本量有限,因此需要更大规模的群体来验证和进一步探讨我们的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信