Critical care pharmacist perspectives on optimal practice models and prioritization of professional activities: A cross-sectional survey.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Zachary R Smith, Nicole M Palm, Susan E Smith, Deepali Dixit, Kelli Keats, Stephanie R Ciapala, Tien Tran, Andrea Sikora, Mojdeh S Heavner
{"title":"Critical care pharmacist perspectives on optimal practice models and prioritization of professional activities: A cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Zachary R Smith, Nicole M Palm, Susan E Smith, Deepali Dixit, Kelli Keats, Stephanie R Ciapala, Tien Tran, Andrea Sikora, Mojdeh S Heavner","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxae151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Critical care pharmacists (CCPs) are essential members of the multidisciplinary critical care team. Professional activities of the CCP are outlined in a 2020 position paper on critical care pharmacy services. This study looks to characterize CCP perspectives for priorities in optimizing pharmacy practice models and professional activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional survey conducted from July 24 to September 20, 2023. A 41-question survey instrument was developed to assess 7 domains: demographics, CCP resource utilization, patient care, quality improvement, research and scholarship, training and education, and professional development. This voluntary survey was sent to members of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy's Critical Care Practice and Research Network. The survey was open for a total of 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a response rate of 20.7% (332 of 1,605 invitees), with 66.6% of respondents (n = 221) completing at least 90% of the survey questions. Most respondents were clinical specialists (58.2%) and/or practiced at an academic medical center (58.5%). Direct patient care, quality improvement and medication safety, and teaching and precepting were identified as the CCP activities of highest importance to CCPs. The CCP-to-patient ratios considered ideal were 1:11-15 (selected by 49.8% of respondents) and 1:16-20 (33.9% of respondents). The ideal percentage of time dedicated to direct patient care activities, as identified by survey respondents, was 50% (interquartile range, 40-50).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the professional activities viewed as having the highest priority by CCPs. Future research is needed to define optimal CCP practice models for the delivery of patient care in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"1267-1277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Critical care pharmacists (CCPs) are essential members of the multidisciplinary critical care team. Professional activities of the CCP are outlined in a 2020 position paper on critical care pharmacy services. This study looks to characterize CCP perspectives for priorities in optimizing pharmacy practice models and professional activities.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey conducted from July 24 to September 20, 2023. A 41-question survey instrument was developed to assess 7 domains: demographics, CCP resource utilization, patient care, quality improvement, research and scholarship, training and education, and professional development. This voluntary survey was sent to members of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy's Critical Care Practice and Research Network. The survey was open for a total of 6 weeks.

Results: There was a response rate of 20.7% (332 of 1,605 invitees), with 66.6% of respondents (n = 221) completing at least 90% of the survey questions. Most respondents were clinical specialists (58.2%) and/or practiced at an academic medical center (58.5%). Direct patient care, quality improvement and medication safety, and teaching and precepting were identified as the CCP activities of highest importance to CCPs. The CCP-to-patient ratios considered ideal were 1:11-15 (selected by 49.8% of respondents) and 1:16-20 (33.9% of respondents). The ideal percentage of time dedicated to direct patient care activities, as identified by survey respondents, was 50% (interquartile range, 40-50).

Conclusion: These findings highlight the professional activities viewed as having the highest priority by CCPs. Future research is needed to define optimal CCP practice models for the delivery of patient care in real-world settings.

重症监护药剂师对最佳实践模式和专业活动优先次序的看法:横断面调查。
免责声明:为了加快文章的出版速度,AJHP在接受稿件后会尽快在网上发布。被录用的稿件已经过同行评审和校对,但在进行技术格式化和作者校对之前会在网上发布。目的:重症监护药剂师 (CCP) 是多学科重症监护团队的重要成员。2020 年重症监护药学服务立场文件概述了 CCP 的专业活动。本研究旨在了解 CCP 对优化药学实践模式和专业活动的优先事项的看法:这是一项横断面调查,于 2023 年 7 月 24 日至 9 月 20 日进行。开发了 41 个问题的调查工具,以评估 7 个领域:人口统计学、CCP 资源利用、患者护理、质量改进、研究与学术、培训与教育以及专业发展。这项自愿性调查的对象是美国临床药学院重症监护实践与研究网络的成员。调查共进行了 6 周:回复率为 20.7%(1605 位受邀者中的 332 位),66.6% 的受访者(n = 221)至少完成了 90% 的调查问题。大多数受访者是临床专家(58.2%)和/或在学术医疗中心工作(58.5%)。直接患者护理、质量改进和用药安全以及教学和带教被认为是 CCP 最为重视的活动。CCP 与患者的理想比例为 1:11-15(49.8% 的受访者选择)和 1:16-20(33.9% 的受访者选择)。调查对象认为,用于直接护理病人活动的理想时间比例为 50%(四分位数间距为 40-50):这些研究结果强调了社区保健中心认为最优先的专业活动。未来需要开展研究,以确定在实际环境中提供患者护理的最佳 CCP 实践模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信