Role of body mass index in anastomotic leakage after curative treatment for rectal cancer.

Annals of Saudi medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2024.135
Reem Alharbi, Osama Almosallam, Sara Albastaki, Asim Almughamsi, Nasser Alsanea
{"title":"Role of body mass index in anastomotic leakage after curative treatment for rectal cancer.","authors":"Reem Alharbi, Osama Almosallam, Sara Albastaki, Asim Almughamsi, Nasser Alsanea","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2024.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic leakage (AL) represents a severe complication after rectal surgery, leading to significant morbidity, mortality, and increased healthcare costs. Despite improvements in surgical methods and perioperative care, the challenge of AL persists.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Explore the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the risk of AL following curative treatment for rectal cancer, providing insight into its predictive value.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Data were collected from a single tertiary center, emphasizing the specialized postoperative outcomes in a high-care setting.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study population was comprised patients who underwent sphincter-saving surgery combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer from 2001 to 2011. Patients with anastomotic stenosis were excluded.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome investigated was the occurrence of AL post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included the assessment of local cancer recurrence rates within the AL group.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>224; 13 excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 237 patients who underwent surgery, 13 with anastomotic stenosis were excluded from this study. Of the remaining 224, 15 individuals (6.3%) developed AL. A potential association between higher BMI and increased AL risk was identified. Additionally, the study noted a higher incidence of local rectal cancer recurrence in the group that developed leakage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest BMI as a significant predictive factor for AL after curative rectal cancer treatment. This emphasizes the need for heightened awareness and possible preoperative counseling for obese patients regarding their increased risk of postoperative leakage.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study was retrospective with all the inherit biases of such studies. The sample size was small and this may have introduced a type 2 statistical error.</p>","PeriodicalId":93875,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2024.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) represents a severe complication after rectal surgery, leading to significant morbidity, mortality, and increased healthcare costs. Despite improvements in surgical methods and perioperative care, the challenge of AL persists.

Objectives: Explore the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the risk of AL following curative treatment for rectal cancer, providing insight into its predictive value.

Design: Retrospective review.

Settings: Data were collected from a single tertiary center, emphasizing the specialized postoperative outcomes in a high-care setting.

Patients and methods: The study population was comprised patients who underwent sphincter-saving surgery combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer from 2001 to 2011. Patients with anastomotic stenosis were excluded.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome investigated was the occurrence of AL post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included the assessment of local cancer recurrence rates within the AL group.

Sample size: 224; 13 excluded.

Results: Of 237 patients who underwent surgery, 13 with anastomotic stenosis were excluded from this study. Of the remaining 224, 15 individuals (6.3%) developed AL. A potential association between higher BMI and increased AL risk was identified. Additionally, the study noted a higher incidence of local rectal cancer recurrence in the group that developed leakage.

Conclusion: The findings suggest BMI as a significant predictive factor for AL after curative rectal cancer treatment. This emphasizes the need for heightened awareness and possible preoperative counseling for obese patients regarding their increased risk of postoperative leakage.

Limitations: The study was retrospective with all the inherit biases of such studies. The sample size was small and this may have introduced a type 2 statistical error.

体重指数在直肠癌根治术后吻合口漏中的作用。
背景:吻合口漏(AL)是直肠手术后的一种严重并发症,可导致严重的发病率、死亡率和医疗费用的增加。尽管手术方法和围手术期护理有所改进,但 AL 的挑战依然存在:探讨体重指数(BMI)对直肠癌根治性治疗后AL风险的影响,深入了解其预测价值:设计:回顾性研究:数据收集自一家三级医疗中心,强调高护理环境下的专业术后结果:研究对象包括2001年至2011年期间接受括约肌挽救手术联合新辅助化疗治疗直肠癌的患者。不包括吻合口狭窄的患者:主要研究结果:主要研究结果是术后AL的发生率。次要结果包括评估AL组的局部癌症复发率。样本量:224;排除13例:结果:在接受手术的 237 名患者中,有 13 名吻合口狭窄患者被排除在本研究之外。在剩余的 224 名患者中,有 15 人(6.3%)出现了 AL。研究发现,体重指数越高,发生 AL 的风险越高。此外,该研究还注意到,在发生渗漏的人群中,局部直肠癌复发率较高:结论:研究结果表明,体重指数是直肠癌根治性治疗后发生 AL 的重要预测因素。结论:研究结果表明,BMI 是直肠癌根治术后发生 AL 的重要预测因素,这强调了有必要提高肥胖患者对术后渗漏风险增加的认识,并为其提供可能的术前咨询:本研究为回顾性研究,具有此类研究固有的偏倚性。样本量较小,这可能会导致2型统计误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信