Major liver resections, perioperative issues and posthepatectomy liver failure: A comprehensive update for the anesthesiologist.

Andrea De Gasperi, Laura Petrò, Ombretta Amici, Ilenia Scaffidi, Pietro Molinari, Caterina Barbaglio, Eva Cibelli, Beatrice Penzo, Elena Roselli, Andrea Brunetti, Maxim Neganov, Alessandro Giacomoni, Paolo Aseni, Elena Guffanti
{"title":"Major liver resections, perioperative issues and posthepatectomy liver failure: A comprehensive update for the anesthesiologist.","authors":"Andrea De Gasperi, Laura Petrò, Ombretta Amici, Ilenia Scaffidi, Pietro Molinari, Caterina Barbaglio, Eva Cibelli, Beatrice Penzo, Elena Roselli, Andrea Brunetti, Maxim Neganov, Alessandro Giacomoni, Paolo Aseni, Elena Guffanti","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.92751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Significant advances in surgical techniques and relevant medium- and long-term outcomes over the past two decades have led to a substantial expansion in the indications for major liver resections. To support these outstanding results and to reduce perioperative complications, anesthesiologists must address and master key perioperative issues (preoperative assessment, proactive intraoperative anesthesia strategies, and implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery approach). Intensive care unit monitoring immediately following liver surgery remains a subject of active and often unresolved debate. Among postoperative complications, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) occurs in different grades of severity (A-C) and frequency (9%-30%), and it is the main cause of 90-d postoperative mortality. PHLF, recently redefined with pragmatic clinical criteria and perioperative scores, can be predicted, prevented, or anticipated. This review highlights: (1) The systemic consequences of surgical manipulations anesthesiologists must respond to or prevent, to positively impact PHLF (a proactive approach); and (2) the maximal intensive treatment of PHLF, including artificial options, mainly based, so far, on Acute Liver Failure treatment(s), to buy time waiting for the recovery of the native liver or, when appropriate and in very selected cases, toward liver transplant. Such a clinical context requires a strong commitment to surgeons, anesthesiologists, and intensivists to work together, for a fruitful collaboration in a mandatory clinical continuum.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11155507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.92751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significant advances in surgical techniques and relevant medium- and long-term outcomes over the past two decades have led to a substantial expansion in the indications for major liver resections. To support these outstanding results and to reduce perioperative complications, anesthesiologists must address and master key perioperative issues (preoperative assessment, proactive intraoperative anesthesia strategies, and implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery approach). Intensive care unit monitoring immediately following liver surgery remains a subject of active and often unresolved debate. Among postoperative complications, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) occurs in different grades of severity (A-C) and frequency (9%-30%), and it is the main cause of 90-d postoperative mortality. PHLF, recently redefined with pragmatic clinical criteria and perioperative scores, can be predicted, prevented, or anticipated. This review highlights: (1) The systemic consequences of surgical manipulations anesthesiologists must respond to or prevent, to positively impact PHLF (a proactive approach); and (2) the maximal intensive treatment of PHLF, including artificial options, mainly based, so far, on Acute Liver Failure treatment(s), to buy time waiting for the recovery of the native liver or, when appropriate and in very selected cases, toward liver transplant. Such a clinical context requires a strong commitment to surgeons, anesthesiologists, and intensivists to work together, for a fruitful collaboration in a mandatory clinical continuum.

肝脏大部切除术、围手术期问题和肝切除术后肝功能衰竭:麻醉医师的全面更新。
在过去二十年中,手术技术和相关中长期疗效取得了长足进步,从而大幅扩大了肝脏大部切除术的适应症范围。为了支持这些杰出的成果并减少围术期并发症,麻醉医生必须解决并掌握关键的围术期问题(术前评估、积极的术中麻醉策略以及术后加强恢复方法的实施)。肝脏手术后立即对重症监护室进行监测仍然是一个活跃的话题,而且往往悬而未决。在术后并发症中,肝切除术后肝衰竭(PHLF)的严重程度(A-C 级)和发生频率(9%-30%)各不相同,是术后 90 天死亡的主要原因。PHLF 最近根据实用的临床标准和围手术期评分重新定义,可以预测、预防或预料。本综述强调:(1) 麻醉医师必须应对或预防手术操作的系统性后果,以对 PHLF 产生积极影响(积极主动的方法);(2) PHLF 的最大强化治疗,包括迄今为止主要基于急性肝衰竭治疗的人工选择,以争取时间等待原肝恢复,或在适当和非常精选的病例中进行肝移植。在这样的临床背景下,外科医生、麻醉师和重症监护医师必须坚定地携手合作,在强制性的临床连续性治疗中开展富有成效的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信