The pediatric DAV-expert algorithm: A GAVeCeLT/GAVePed consensus for the choice of the most appropriate venous access device in children.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1177/11297298241256999
Mauro Pittiruti, Alessandro Crocoli, Clelia Zanaboni, Maria Giuseppina Annetta, Michela Bevilacqua, Daniele G Biasucci, Davide Celentano, Simone Cesaro, Antonio Chiaretti, Nicola Disma, Aldo Mancino, Cristina Martucci, Lidia Muscheri, Alessio Pini Prato, Alessandro Raffaele, Simone Reali, Francesca Rossetti, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo, Luca Sidro, Geremia Zito Marinosci, Gilda Pepe
{"title":"The pediatric DAV-expert algorithm: A GAVeCeLT/GAVePed consensus for the choice of the most appropriate venous access device in children.","authors":"Mauro Pittiruti, Alessandro Crocoli, Clelia Zanaboni, Maria Giuseppina Annetta, Michela Bevilacqua, Daniele G Biasucci, Davide Celentano, Simone Cesaro, Antonio Chiaretti, Nicola Disma, Aldo Mancino, Cristina Martucci, Lidia Muscheri, Alessio Pini Prato, Alessandro Raffaele, Simone Reali, Francesca Rossetti, Giancarlo Scoppettuolo, Luca Sidro, Geremia Zito Marinosci, Gilda Pepe","doi":"10.1177/11297298241256999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In pediatric patients, the choice of the venous access device currently relies upon the operator's experience and preference and on the local availability of specific resources and technologies. Though, considering the limited options for venous access in children if compared to adults, such clinical choice has a great critical relevance and should preferably be based on the best available evidence. Though some algorithms have been published over the last 5 years, none of them seems fully satisfactory and useful in clinical practice. Thus, the GAVePed-which is the pediatric interest group of the most important Italian group on venous access, GAVeCeLT-has developed a national consensus about the choice of the venous access device in children. After a systematic review of the available evidence, the panel of the consensus (which included Italian experts with documented competence in this area) has provided structured recommendations answering 10 key questions regarding the choice of venous access both in emergency and in elective situations, both in the hospitalized and in the non-hospitalized child. Only statements reaching a complete agreement were included in the final recommendations. All recommendations were also structured as a simple visual algorithm, so as to be easily translated into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"715-725"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241256999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In pediatric patients, the choice of the venous access device currently relies upon the operator's experience and preference and on the local availability of specific resources and technologies. Though, considering the limited options for venous access in children if compared to adults, such clinical choice has a great critical relevance and should preferably be based on the best available evidence. Though some algorithms have been published over the last 5 years, none of them seems fully satisfactory and useful in clinical practice. Thus, the GAVePed-which is the pediatric interest group of the most important Italian group on venous access, GAVeCeLT-has developed a national consensus about the choice of the venous access device in children. After a systematic review of the available evidence, the panel of the consensus (which included Italian experts with documented competence in this area) has provided structured recommendations answering 10 key questions regarding the choice of venous access both in emergency and in elective situations, both in the hospitalized and in the non-hospitalized child. Only statements reaching a complete agreement were included in the final recommendations. All recommendations were also structured as a simple visual algorithm, so as to be easily translated into clinical practice.

儿科 DAV 专家算法:GAVeCeLT/GAVePed 就选择最合适的儿童静脉通路装置达成共识。
在儿科患者中,静脉通路装置的选择目前取决于操作者的经验和偏好,以及当地特定资源和技术的可用性。不过,考虑到与成人相比,儿童静脉通路的选择有限,这种临床选择具有重要意义,最好以现有的最佳证据为基础。虽然在过去 5 年中已经发布了一些算法,但似乎没有一种算法能完全令人满意并在临床实践中发挥作用。因此,意大利最重要的静脉通路组织 GAVeCeLT 的儿科兴趣小组 GAVePed 就儿童静脉通路装置的选择达成了全国共识。在对现有证据进行系统性审查后,共识小组(包括在该领域具有丰富经验的意大利专家)针对急诊和择期、住院和非住院儿童静脉通路选择的 10 个关键问题提出了结构化建议。只有达成完全一致的声明才被纳入最终建议。所有建议均以简单的可视化算法编排,以便于临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信