Can Pretreatment MRI and Planning CT Radiomics Improve Prediction of Complete Pathological Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Treatment?

IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1007/s12029-024-01073-z
Jeba Karunya Ramireddy, A Sathya, Balu Krishna Sasidharan, Amal Joseph Varghese, Arvind Sathyamurthy, Neenu Oliver John, Anuradha Chandramohan, Ashish Singh, Anjana Joel, Rohin Mittal, Dipti Masih, Kripa Varghese, Grace Rebekah, Thomas Samuel Ram, Hannah Mary T Thomas
{"title":"Can Pretreatment MRI and Planning CT Radiomics Improve Prediction of Complete Pathological Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Treatment?","authors":"Jeba Karunya Ramireddy, A Sathya, Balu Krishna Sasidharan, Amal Joseph Varghese, Arvind Sathyamurthy, Neenu Oliver John, Anuradha Chandramohan, Ashish Singh, Anjana Joel, Rohin Mittal, Dipti Masih, Kripa Varghese, Grace Rebekah, Thomas Samuel Ram, Hannah Mary T Thomas","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01073-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective(s): </strong>The treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) differs largely in individuals treated for rectal cancer. In this study, we investigated the role of radiomics to predict the pathological response in locally advanced rectal cancers at different treatment time points: (1) before the start of any treatment using baseline T2-weighted MRI (T2W-MR) and (2) at the start of radiation treatment using planning CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients on nCRT followed by surgery between June 2017 to December 2019 were included in the study. Histopathological tumour response grading (TRG) was used for classification, and gross tumour volume was defined by the radiation oncologists. Following resampling, 100 and 103 pyradiomic features were extracted from T2W-MR and planning CT images, respectively. Synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was used to address class imbalance. Four machine learning classifiers built clinical, radiomic, and merged models. Model performances were evaluated on a held-out test dataset following 3-fold cross-validation using area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fifty patients were included; 58/150 with TRG 1 were classified as complete responders, and rest were incomplete responders (IR). Clinical models performed better (AUC = 0.68) compared to radiomics models (AUC = 0.62). Overall, the clinical + T2W-MR model showed best performance (AUC = 0.72) in predicting the pathological response prior to therapy. Clinical + Planning CT-merged models could only achieve the highest AUC of 0.66.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Merging clinical and baseline T2W-MR radiomics enhances predicting pathological response in rectal cancer. Validation in larger cohorts is warranted, especially for watch and wait strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01073-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective(s): The treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) differs largely in individuals treated for rectal cancer. In this study, we investigated the role of radiomics to predict the pathological response in locally advanced rectal cancers at different treatment time points: (1) before the start of any treatment using baseline T2-weighted MRI (T2W-MR) and (2) at the start of radiation treatment using planning CT.

Methods: Patients on nCRT followed by surgery between June 2017 to December 2019 were included in the study. Histopathological tumour response grading (TRG) was used for classification, and gross tumour volume was defined by the radiation oncologists. Following resampling, 100 and 103 pyradiomic features were extracted from T2W-MR and planning CT images, respectively. Synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was used to address class imbalance. Four machine learning classifiers built clinical, radiomic, and merged models. Model performances were evaluated on a held-out test dataset following 3-fold cross-validation using area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals.

Results: One hundred and fifty patients were included; 58/150 with TRG 1 were classified as complete responders, and rest were incomplete responders (IR). Clinical models performed better (AUC = 0.68) compared to radiomics models (AUC = 0.62). Overall, the clinical + T2W-MR model showed best performance (AUC = 0.72) in predicting the pathological response prior to therapy. Clinical + Planning CT-merged models could only achieve the highest AUC of 0.66.

Conclusion: Merging clinical and baseline T2W-MR radiomics enhances predicting pathological response in rectal cancer. Validation in larger cohorts is warranted, especially for watch and wait strategies.

治疗前磁共振成像和规划 CT 放射线组学能否改善新辅助治疗后局部晚期直肠癌完全病理反应的预测?
目的:直肠癌患者对新辅助化疗(nCRT)的治疗反应存在很大差异。在这项研究中,我们研究了放射组学在不同治疗时间点预测局部晚期直肠癌病理反应的作用:(1)在任何治疗开始之前,使用基线 T2 加权磁共振成像(T2W-MR);(2)在放疗开始时,使用计划 CT:研究纳入了 2017 年 6 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受 nCRT 后进行手术的患者。组织病理学肿瘤反应分级(TRG)用于分类,肿瘤总体积由放射肿瘤专家定义。重新取样后,分别从 T2W-MR 和规划 CT 图像中提取了 100 和 103 个放射灶特征。合成少数过采样技术(SMOTE)用于解决类不平衡问题。四种机器学习分类器建立了临床、放射学和合并模型。模型的性能在一个保留的测试数据集上进行了评估,该数据集使用接收器操作者特征曲线下面积(AUC)和自引导95%置信区间进行3倍交叉验证:结果:共纳入了 150 名患者,其中 58/150 名 TRG 1 患者被归类为完全应答者,其余为不完全应答者(IR)。与放射组学模型(AUC = 0.62)相比,临床模型的表现更好(AUC = 0.68)。总体而言,临床+T2W-MR模型在预测治疗前病理反应方面表现最佳(AUC = 0.72)。临床+规划CT合并模型只能达到最高的AUC,即0.66:合并临床和基线T2W-MR放射组学可提高预测直肠癌病理反应的能力。需要在更大的队列中进行验证,尤其是在观察和等待策略中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology:  This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信