Perioperative ROTEM® evaluation in a patient affected by severe VII factor deficiency undergoing microvascular decompression craniotomy for hemifacial spasm.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Michele Introna, Morgan Broggi, Paolo Ferroli, Donato Martino, Carmela Pinto, Monica Carpenedo, Marco Gemma
{"title":"Perioperative ROTEM® evaluation in a patient affected by severe VII factor deficiency undergoing microvascular decompression craniotomy for hemifacial spasm.","authors":"Michele Introna, Morgan Broggi, Paolo Ferroli, Donato Martino, Carmela Pinto, Monica Carpenedo, Marco Gemma","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01183-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The potential use of TEG/ROTEM® in evaluating the bleeding risk for rare coagulation disorders needs to be assessed, considering the common mismatch among laboratory tests and the clinical manifestations. As a result, there is currently no published data on the use of viscoelastic tests to assess coagulation in FVII deficient patients undergoing elective neurosurgery. We describe the case of a patient affected by severe FVII deficiency who underwent microvascular decompression (MVD) craniotomy for hemifacial spasm (HFS). The ROTEM® did not show a significant coagulopathy according to the normal ranges, before and after the preoperative administration of the recombinant activated FVII, but a substantial reduction in EXTEM and FIBTEM Clotting Times was noted. The values of coagulation in standard tests, on the contrary, were indicative of a coagulopathy, which was corrected by the administration of replacement therapy. Whether this difference between ROTEM® and standard tests is due to the inadequacy of thromboelastographic normal ranges in this setting, or to the absence of clinically significant coagulopathy, has yet to be clarified. Neurosurgery is a typical high bleeding risk surgery; additional data is required to clarify the potential role for thromboelastographic tests in the perioperative evaluation of the FVII deficient neurosurgical patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"1431-1435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11604791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01183-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The potential use of TEG/ROTEM® in evaluating the bleeding risk for rare coagulation disorders needs to be assessed, considering the common mismatch among laboratory tests and the clinical manifestations. As a result, there is currently no published data on the use of viscoelastic tests to assess coagulation in FVII deficient patients undergoing elective neurosurgery. We describe the case of a patient affected by severe FVII deficiency who underwent microvascular decompression (MVD) craniotomy for hemifacial spasm (HFS). The ROTEM® did not show a significant coagulopathy according to the normal ranges, before and after the preoperative administration of the recombinant activated FVII, but a substantial reduction in EXTEM and FIBTEM Clotting Times was noted. The values of coagulation in standard tests, on the contrary, were indicative of a coagulopathy, which was corrected by the administration of replacement therapy. Whether this difference between ROTEM® and standard tests is due to the inadequacy of thromboelastographic normal ranges in this setting, or to the absence of clinically significant coagulopathy, has yet to be clarified. Neurosurgery is a typical high bleeding risk surgery; additional data is required to clarify the potential role for thromboelastographic tests in the perioperative evaluation of the FVII deficient neurosurgical patients.

Abstract Image

对一名因半面痉挛而接受微血管减压开颅手术的严重 VII 因子缺乏症患者进行围手术期 ROTEM® 评估。
考虑到实验室检测与临床表现不匹配的普遍现象,需要对 TEG/ROTEM® 在评估罕见凝血功能障碍出血风险方面的潜在用途进行评估。因此,目前还没有关于使用粘弹性测试评估接受择期神经外科手术的 FVII 缺乏患者凝血功能的公开数据。我们描述了一例因严重 FVII 缺乏而接受微血管减压(MVD)开颅手术治疗半面痉挛(HFS)的患者。在术前服用重组活化 FVII 之前和之后,ROTEM® 在正常范围内均未显示出明显的凝血病变,但 EXTEM 和 FIBTEM 凝血时间显著缩短。相反,标准测试中的凝血值则表明出现了凝血功能障碍,而通过使用替代疗法,凝血功能障碍得到了纠正。ROTEM® 和标准测试之间的这种差异究竟是由于血栓弹力图正常范围在这种情况下的不足,还是由于没有临床意义上的凝血病变,尚有待澄清。神经外科手术是典型的高出血风险手术;需要更多数据来明确血栓弹性成像检测在 FVII 缺乏的神经外科患者围手术期评估中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信