Association of Drug-Disease Interactions with Mortality or Readmission in Hospitalised Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.9 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drugs - Real World Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-09 DOI:10.1007/s40801-024-00432-3
Joshua M Inglis, Gillian Caughey, Tilenka Thynne, Kate Brotherton, Danny Liew, Arduino A Mangoni, Sepehr Shakib
{"title":"Association of Drug-Disease Interactions with Mortality or Readmission in Hospitalised Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Joshua M Inglis, Gillian Caughey, Tilenka Thynne, Kate Brotherton, Danny Liew, Arduino A Mangoni, Sepehr Shakib","doi":"10.1007/s40801-024-00432-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Multimorbidity is common in hospitalised adults who are at increased risk of inappropriate prescribing including drug-disease interactions. These interactions occur when a medicine being used to treat one condition exacerbates a concurrent medical condition and may lead to adverse health outcomes. The aim of this review was to examine the association between drug-disease interactions and the risk of mortality and readmission in hospitalised middle-aged and older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted on drug-disease interactions in hospitalised middle-aged (45-64 years) and older adults (≥65 years). The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42022341998). Drug-disease interactions were defined as a medicine being used to treat one condition with the potential to exacerbate a concurrent medical condition or that were inappropriate based on a comorbid medical condition. Both observational and interventional studies were included. The outcomes of interest were mortality and readmissions. The databases searched included MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Library from inception to 12 July, 2022. A meta-analysis was performed to pool risk estimates using the random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 563 studies were identified and four met the inclusion criteria. All were observational studies in older adults, with no studies identified in middle-aged adults. Most of the studies were at risk of bias because of an inadequate adjustment for covariates and a lack of clarity around individuals lost to follow-up. There were various definitions of drug-disease interactions within these four studies. Two studies assessed drugs that were contraindicated based on renal function, one assessed an individual drug-disease combination, and one was based on the clinical judgement of a pharmacist. There were two studies that showed an association between drug-disease interactions and the outcomes of interest. One reported that the use of diltiazem in patients with heart failure was associated with an increased risk of readmissions. The second reported that the use of medicines contraindicated according to renal function were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality and a composite of mortality and readmission. Three of the studies (total study population = 5705) were amenable to a meta-analysis, which showed no significant association between drug-disease interactions and readmissions (odds ratio = 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.80-1.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Few studies were identified examining the risk of drug-disease interactions and mortality and readmission in hospitalised adults. Most of the identified studies were at risk of bias. There is no universal accepted definition of drug-disease interactions in the literature. Further studies are needed to develop a standardised and accepted definition of these interactions to guide further research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":11282,"journal":{"name":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs - Real World Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-024-00432-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Multimorbidity is common in hospitalised adults who are at increased risk of inappropriate prescribing including drug-disease interactions. These interactions occur when a medicine being used to treat one condition exacerbates a concurrent medical condition and may lead to adverse health outcomes. The aim of this review was to examine the association between drug-disease interactions and the risk of mortality and readmission in hospitalised middle-aged and older adults.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted on drug-disease interactions in hospitalised middle-aged (45-64 years) and older adults (≥65 years). The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42022341998). Drug-disease interactions were defined as a medicine being used to treat one condition with the potential to exacerbate a concurrent medical condition or that were inappropriate based on a comorbid medical condition. Both observational and interventional studies were included. The outcomes of interest were mortality and readmissions. The databases searched included MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Library from inception to 12 July, 2022. A meta-analysis was performed to pool risk estimates using the random-effects model.

Results: A total of 563 studies were identified and four met the inclusion criteria. All were observational studies in older adults, with no studies identified in middle-aged adults. Most of the studies were at risk of bias because of an inadequate adjustment for covariates and a lack of clarity around individuals lost to follow-up. There were various definitions of drug-disease interactions within these four studies. Two studies assessed drugs that were contraindicated based on renal function, one assessed an individual drug-disease combination, and one was based on the clinical judgement of a pharmacist. There were two studies that showed an association between drug-disease interactions and the outcomes of interest. One reported that the use of diltiazem in patients with heart failure was associated with an increased risk of readmissions. The second reported that the use of medicines contraindicated according to renal function were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality and a composite of mortality and readmission. Three of the studies (total study population = 5705) were amenable to a meta-analysis, which showed no significant association between drug-disease interactions and readmissions (odds ratio = 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.80-1.38).

Conclusions: Few studies were identified examining the risk of drug-disease interactions and mortality and readmission in hospitalised adults. Most of the identified studies were at risk of bias. There is no universal accepted definition of drug-disease interactions in the literature. Further studies are needed to develop a standardised and accepted definition of these interactions to guide further research in this area.

药物-疾病相互作用与住院中老年人死亡率或再入院率的关系:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景和目的:在住院的成年人中,多病共存现象十分普遍,这增加了不当处方的风险,包括药物与疾病之间的相互作用。当用于治疗一种疾病的药物加重了同时存在的另一种疾病时,就会发生这种相互作用,并可能导致不良的健康后果。本综述旨在研究药物-疾病相互作用与住院中老年人的死亡率和再入院风险之间的关系:方法:对住院的中年人(45-64 岁)和老年人(≥65 岁)的药物-疾病相互作用进行了系统回顾。研究方案在 PROSPERO 进行了前瞻性注册(注册号:CRD42022341998)。药物与疾病相互作用的定义是:用于治疗一种疾病的药物有可能加重同时存在的一种疾病,或者根据合并症不适合使用这种药物。观察性研究和干预性研究均包括在内。关注的结果是死亡率和再住院率。检索的数据库包括 MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、Web of Science、SCOPUS 和 Cochrane Library,检索时间从开始到 2022 年 7 月 12 日。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以汇总风险估计值:共确定了 563 项研究,其中 4 项符合纳入标准。所有研究都是针对老年人的观察性研究,没有发现针对中年人的研究。大多数研究都存在偏倚风险,原因是对协变量的调整不足,以及对失去随访的个体缺乏明确性。这四项研究对药物与疾病相互作用的定义各不相同。两项研究评估了基于肾功能的禁忌药物,一项研究评估了单个药物与疾病的组合,还有一项研究基于药剂师的临床判断。有两项研究显示药物与疾病的相互作用与相关结果之间存在关联。其中一项报告称,心力衰竭患者使用地尔硫卓与再入院风险增加有关。第二项研究报告称,肾功能禁忌药物的使用与全因死亡率以及死亡率和再入院综合风险的增加有关。其中三项研究(研究总人数=5705)适合进行荟萃分析,分析结果显示药物与疾病间的相互作用与再入院之间没有显著关联(几率比=1.0,95%置信区间为0.80-1.38):很少有研究对药物-疾病相互作用与成人住院患者的死亡率和再入院率的风险进行研究。大部分已确定的研究存在偏倚风险。文献中并没有公认的药物与疾病相互作用的定义。需要进一步开展研究,为这些相互作用制定一个标准化的公认定义,以指导该领域的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs - Real World Outcomes
Drugs - Real World Outcomes PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs - Real World Outcomes targets original research and definitive reviews regarding the use of real-world data to evaluate health outcomes and inform healthcare decision-making on drugs, devices and other interventions in clinical practice. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas: Using registries/databases/health records and other non-selected observational datasets to investigate: drug use and treatment outcomes prescription patterns drug safety signals adherence to treatment guidelines benefit : risk profiles comparative effectiveness economic analyses including cost-of-illness Data-driven research methodologies, including the capture, curation, search, sharing, analysis and interpretation of ‘big data’ Techniques and approaches to optimise real-world modelling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信