Foot radiologic morphology as a predictor of pseudo-jones fractures: A retrospective case-control study

Q2 Health Professions
Foot Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1016/j.foot.2024.102103
Erdi Imre , Bilgin Bozgeyik , Onur Kaya
{"title":"Foot radiologic morphology as a predictor of pseudo-jones fractures: A retrospective case-control study","authors":"Erdi Imre ,&nbsp;Bilgin Bozgeyik ,&nbsp;Onur Kaya","doi":"10.1016/j.foot.2024.102103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Fifth metatarsal basis fractures are common injuries. Zone 1 fractures are also known as pseudo-jones fractures. This study aimed to elucidate the impact of foot radiologic morphology on pseudo-Jones fractures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with pseudo-Jones fractures formed the case group and individuals with ankle sprains but no fractures formed control group. Weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were evaluated for pre-determined measurements: metatarsus adductus angle (MAA), intermetatarsal angles (1−2, 4−5), calcaneal inclination (CI) angle, and fifth metatarsal base angle. All measurements were performed by a single investigator using digital PACS tools. Statistical analysis compared these radiographic parameters between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The fracture group demonstrated a significantly lower 4–5 intermetatarsal and calcaneal inclination angles than the control group (p &lt; 0.05). Notably, no statistically significant difference was found in the metatarsus adductus angle.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates a potential association between foot radiographic morphology and pseudo-Jones fractures. Patients with a lower 4–5 IMA and calcaneal inclination angle may be at a higher risk for developing pseudo-Jones fractures. However, these requires future prospective studies.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level III case control study</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12349,"journal":{"name":"Foot","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 102103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958259224000361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Fifth metatarsal basis fractures are common injuries. Zone 1 fractures are also known as pseudo-jones fractures. This study aimed to elucidate the impact of foot radiologic morphology on pseudo-Jones fractures.

Methods

Patients with pseudo-Jones fractures formed the case group and individuals with ankle sprains but no fractures formed control group. Weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were evaluated for pre-determined measurements: metatarsus adductus angle (MAA), intermetatarsal angles (1−2, 4−5), calcaneal inclination (CI) angle, and fifth metatarsal base angle. All measurements were performed by a single investigator using digital PACS tools. Statistical analysis compared these radiographic parameters between the groups.

Results

The fracture group demonstrated a significantly lower 4–5 intermetatarsal and calcaneal inclination angles than the control group (p < 0.05). Notably, no statistically significant difference was found in the metatarsus adductus angle.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a potential association between foot radiographic morphology and pseudo-Jones fractures. Patients with a lower 4–5 IMA and calcaneal inclination angle may be at a higher risk for developing pseudo-Jones fractures. However, these requires future prospective studies.

Level of evidence

Level III case control study

足部放射学形态是假性骨骨折的预测因素:回顾性病例对照研究
背景第五跖骨基底骨折是一种常见的损伤。1区骨折也被称为假性琼斯骨折。本研究旨在阐明足部放射学形态对假喙突骨折的影响。方法假喙突骨折患者组成病例组,踝关节扭伤但无骨折者组成对照组。对负重前后位和侧位X光片进行预先确定的测量:跖骨内收角(MAA)、跖骨间角(1-2、4-5)、小腿骨倾斜角(CI)和第五跖骨基底角。所有测量均由一名研究人员使用数字 PACS 工具完成。结果骨折组的 4-5跖间角和小趾骨倾斜角明显低于对照组(p <0.05)。值得注意的是,跖骨内收角的差异无统计学意义。IMA 和小腿骨倾斜角较低 4-5 的患者发生假性琼斯骨折的风险可能较高。然而,这些都需要未来的前瞻性研究。证据级别III级病例对照研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot
Foot Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Foot is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of scientific approaches and medical and surgical treatment of the foot. The Foot aims to provide a multidisciplinary platform for all specialties involved in treating disorders of the foot. At present it is the only journal which provides this inter-disciplinary opportunity. Primary research papers cover a wide range of disorders of the foot and their treatment, including diabetes, vascular disease, neurological, dermatological and infectious conditions, sports injuries, biomechanics, bioengineering, orthoses and prostheses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信