Issues and Challenges of Communicating Interfacility Transfer Patient Information in the United States: A Systematic Review.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Benjamin J Galatzan, Elizabeth Johnson, Tonya Judson
{"title":"Issues and Challenges of Communicating Interfacility Transfer Patient Information in the United States: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Benjamin J Galatzan, Elizabeth Johnson, Tonya Judson","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-2023-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The interfacility transfer places the patient at greater risk for poor outcomes due to outdated, inaccurate, or miscommunication of patient information at the time of transfer. Rural patients are at greater risk for poor outcomes due to experiencing a higher rate of transfers because of healthcare inequities related to limited access to specialty and critical care services. This paper systematically reviewed the literature to describe the current state of interfacility transfer communication practices and methods in the United States. <b>Methods:</b> The review followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines and checklist. PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched using MeSH terms and keywords. Inclusion criteria: peer-reviewd research articles published in English from 2013 to 2022 in the United States, and included both adult and pediatric patient transfers. It was noted that there is a lack of research on nursing-based interfacility transfer communication practices and methods. <b>Results:</b> A total of 763 articles were reviewed, and 24 met eligibility for inclusion. The following coded themes were identified in the research literature: transfer patient characteristics and geographic barriers, communication challenges, transfer process, interoperability, digital intervention, and standardized transfer tools. <b>Conclusion:</b> The development and implementation of an integrated standardized interfacility transfer communication tool are warranted to decrease miscommunication and improve patient outcomes. The integration of technologies such as telehealth, the use of health information exchanges, and improved interoperability between health systems can improve communication and outcomes for all transfer patients but specifically rural transfers. Additionally, healthcare workers, particularly those in rural areas, need adequate infrastructure and financial resources to achieve positive patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2023-0113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The interfacility transfer places the patient at greater risk for poor outcomes due to outdated, inaccurate, or miscommunication of patient information at the time of transfer. Rural patients are at greater risk for poor outcomes due to experiencing a higher rate of transfers because of healthcare inequities related to limited access to specialty and critical care services. This paper systematically reviewed the literature to describe the current state of interfacility transfer communication practices and methods in the United States. Methods: The review followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines and checklist. PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched using MeSH terms and keywords. Inclusion criteria: peer-reviewd research articles published in English from 2013 to 2022 in the United States, and included both adult and pediatric patient transfers. It was noted that there is a lack of research on nursing-based interfacility transfer communication practices and methods. Results: A total of 763 articles were reviewed, and 24 met eligibility for inclusion. The following coded themes were identified in the research literature: transfer patient characteristics and geographic barriers, communication challenges, transfer process, interoperability, digital intervention, and standardized transfer tools. Conclusion: The development and implementation of an integrated standardized interfacility transfer communication tool are warranted to decrease miscommunication and improve patient outcomes. The integration of technologies such as telehealth, the use of health information exchanges, and improved interoperability between health systems can improve communication and outcomes for all transfer patients but specifically rural transfers. Additionally, healthcare workers, particularly those in rural areas, need adequate infrastructure and financial resources to achieve positive patient outcomes.

美国机构间转运患者信息交流的问题与挑战:系统回顾。
背景:由于转院时患者信息的过时、不准确或传达错误,医院间转院使患者面临更高的不良后果风险。农村地区的病人转院率更高,因为他们在获得专科和重症监护服务方面存在医疗不公平现象,因此出现不良后果的风险更大。本文系统回顾了相关文献,描述了美国医疗机构间转院沟通实践和方法的现状。方法:综述遵循了 2020 年系统综述和元分析首选报告项目指南和核对表。使用 MeSH 术语和关键词对 PubMed、CINAHL 和 Scopus 进行了检索。纳入标准:2013 年至 2022 年在美国发表的同行评审的英文研究文章,包括成人和儿童患者的转运。据悉,目前缺乏对基于护理的设施间转运沟通实践和方法的研究。结果:共审查了 763 篇文章,其中 24 篇符合纳入条件。研究文献中确定了以下编码主题:转运患者特征和地理障碍、沟通挑战、转运过程、互操作性、数字化干预和标准化转运工具。结论有必要开发和实施综合的标准化医院间转运沟通工具,以减少沟通不畅,改善患者预后。远程医疗等技术的整合、医疗信息交换的使用以及医疗系统间互操作性的提高,可以改善所有转院患者的沟通和转院结果,尤其是农村转院患者。此外,医护人员,尤其是农村地区的医护人员,需要充足的基础设施和财政资源来实现积极的患者治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信