Elements of Return-to-Work Interventions for Workers on Long-Term Sick Leave: A Systematic Literature Review.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Christa J C de Geus, Maaike A Huysmans, H Jolanda van Rijssen, Marianne de Maaker-Berkhof, Linda J Schoonmade, Johannes R Anema
{"title":"Elements of Return-to-Work Interventions for Workers on Long-Term Sick Leave: A Systematic Literature Review.","authors":"Christa J C de Geus, Maaike A Huysmans, H Jolanda van Rijssen, Marianne de Maaker-Berkhof, Linda J Schoonmade, Johannes R Anema","doi":"10.1007/s10926-024-10203-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this systematic review is to identify vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions that are effective to enhance return-to-work (RTW) for people on long-term sick leave (> 90 days) and to identify main elements of these interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies published up to February 2022. Each article was screened independently by two different reviewers. Thereafter, one author performed the data-extraction which was checked by another author. The EPHPP quality assessment tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11.837 articles were identified. 21 articles were included in the review, which described 25 interventions. Results showed that ten interventions were more effective than usual care on RTW. Two interventions had mixed results. The effective interventions varied widely in content, but were often more extensive than usual care. Common elements of the effective interventions were: coaching, counseling and motivational interviewing, planning return to work, placing the worker in work or teaching practical skills and advising at the workplace. However, these elements were also common in interventions that were not effective on RTW compared to usual care and can therefore not explain why certain interventions are effective and others are not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effective interventions included in this study were often quite extensive and aimed at multiple phases of the RTW-process of the worker. In the future, researchers need to describe the population and the content of the investigated interventions more elaborate to be able to better compare VR interventions and determine what elements make interventions effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10203-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this systematic review is to identify vocational rehabilitation (VR) interventions that are effective to enhance return-to-work (RTW) for people on long-term sick leave (> 90 days) and to identify main elements of these interventions.

Methods: Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies published up to February 2022. Each article was screened independently by two different reviewers. Thereafter, one author performed the data-extraction which was checked by another author. The EPHPP quality assessment tool was used to appraise the methodological quality of the studies.

Results: 11.837 articles were identified. 21 articles were included in the review, which described 25 interventions. Results showed that ten interventions were more effective than usual care on RTW. Two interventions had mixed results. The effective interventions varied widely in content, but were often more extensive than usual care. Common elements of the effective interventions were: coaching, counseling and motivational interviewing, planning return to work, placing the worker in work or teaching practical skills and advising at the workplace. However, these elements were also common in interventions that were not effective on RTW compared to usual care and can therefore not explain why certain interventions are effective and others are not.

Conclusion: The effective interventions included in this study were often quite extensive and aimed at multiple phases of the RTW-process of the worker. In the future, researchers need to describe the population and the content of the investigated interventions more elaborate to be able to better compare VR interventions and determine what elements make interventions effective.

Abstract Image

针对长期病假工人的重返工作干预措施要素:系统性文献综述。
目的:本系统性综述旨在确定有效促进长期病假(大于 90 天)者重返工作岗位(RTW)的职业康复(VR)干预措施,并确定这些干预措施的主要内容:我们在六个电子数据库中搜索了截至 2022 年 2 月发表的经同行评审的研究文章。每篇文章均由两名不同的审稿人独立筛选。之后,由一位作者进行数据提取,并由另一位作者进行检查。EPHPP 质量评估工具用于评估研究的方法学质量:结果:共发现 11837 篇文章。21 篇文章被纳入综述,其中介绍了 25 种干预措施。结果显示,在复工方面,10 项干预措施比常规护理更有效。两项干预措施的效果参差不齐。有效干预措施的内容差别很大,但通常比常规护理更广泛。有效干预措施的共同要素包括:辅导、咨询和动机访谈、规划重返工作、安排工人工作或教授实用技能以及在工作场所提供建议。然而,与常规护理相比,这些要素在对复工无效的干预措施中也很常见,因此无法解释为什么某些干预措施有效而其他干预措施无效:本研究中包含的有效干预措施通常相当广泛,针对工人复工过程中的多个阶段。今后,研究人员需要更详细地描述所调查干预措施的人群和内容,以便更好地比较自愿退休干预措施,并确定哪些因素使干预措施有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law.  A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信