Clinical considerations when switching antiretroviral therapy.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1080/17512433.2024.2365826
Analuz Fernández, Arkaitz Imaz
{"title":"Clinical considerations when switching antiretroviral therapy.","authors":"Analuz Fernández, Arkaitz Imaz","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2024.2365826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antiretroviral therapy (ART) can be personalized through simple formulations with high resistance barriers, favorable safety profiles, and novel administration routes. Switching treatments has become a key clinical strategy for addressing drug toxicity and interactions and enhancing adherence and convenience. This strategy aims to improve the quality of life and long-term efficacy, even in challenging cases like people living with HIV (PLWH) with multiple comorbidities, prior virological failure, and drug resistance.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The authors reviewed clinical trials and cohort studies providing evidence of benefits and risks of current antiretroviral (ARV) drugs as switching options for PLWH in various scenarios. The literature search included clinical trials, meta-analyses, observational studies, and review articles in English published after 2000, and current HIV treatment guidelines in English and Spanish as of February 2024.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>New ARV drugs offer advantages in efficacy and safety over previous options but may also have adverse effects. Second-generation integrase inhibitors and tenofovir alafenamide show benefits as switching options in various scenarios, though more research is needed on potential weight gain and metabolic issues. Injectable long-acting ART is promising for switching strategies, but finding the optimal combination of new drugs remains challenging.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2024.2365826","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) can be personalized through simple formulations with high resistance barriers, favorable safety profiles, and novel administration routes. Switching treatments has become a key clinical strategy for addressing drug toxicity and interactions and enhancing adherence and convenience. This strategy aims to improve the quality of life and long-term efficacy, even in challenging cases like people living with HIV (PLWH) with multiple comorbidities, prior virological failure, and drug resistance.

Areas covered: The authors reviewed clinical trials and cohort studies providing evidence of benefits and risks of current antiretroviral (ARV) drugs as switching options for PLWH in various scenarios. The literature search included clinical trials, meta-analyses, observational studies, and review articles in English published after 2000, and current HIV treatment guidelines in English and Spanish as of February 2024.

Expert opinion: New ARV drugs offer advantages in efficacy and safety over previous options but may also have adverse effects. Second-generation integrase inhibitors and tenofovir alafenamide show benefits as switching options in various scenarios, though more research is needed on potential weight gain and metabolic issues. Injectable long-acting ART is promising for switching strategies, but finding the optimal combination of new drugs remains challenging.

转换抗逆转录病毒疗法时的临床考虑因素。
导言:抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)可以通过具有高耐药性屏障、良好的安全性和新型给药途径的简单制剂实现个性化治疗。转换疗法已成为解决药物毒性和相互作用、提高依从性和便利性的关键临床策略。这一策略旨在提高生活质量和长期疗效,即使是对具有多种并发症、既往病毒学失败和耐药性的艾滋病病毒感染者(PLWH)等具有挑战性的病例也是如此:作者对临床试验和队列研究进行了综述,这些研究提供了当前抗逆转录病毒(ARV)药物在不同情况下作为 PLWH 转药选择的益处和风险证据。文献检索包括 2000 年之后发表的英文临床试验、荟萃分析、观察性研究和综述文章,以及截至 2024 年 2 月的英文和西班牙文现行 HIV 治疗指南:新的抗逆转录病毒药物在疗效和安全性方面均优于以往的选择,但也可能存在不良反应。第二代整合酶抑制剂和替诺福韦-阿拉非那胺显示出在各种情况下作为转换方案的优势,但还需要对潜在的体重增加和代谢问题进行更多研究。注射用长效抗逆转录病毒疗法在转换策略中大有可为,但找到新药的最佳组合仍具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信