Patient recall of intensive care delirium: A qualitative investigation.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1111/aas.14463
Kirstine N la Cour, Nina C Andersen-Ranberg, Camilla Mortensen, Lone M Poulsen, Ole Mathiesen, Ingrid Egerod, Marie Collet
{"title":"Patient recall of intensive care delirium: A qualitative investigation.","authors":"Kirstine N la Cour, Nina C Andersen-Ranberg, Camilla Mortensen, Lone M Poulsen, Ole Mathiesen, Ingrid Egerod, Marie Collet","doi":"10.1111/aas.14463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) experience delirium. Understanding the patient perspective of delirium is important to improve care and reduce suffering. The aim of our study was to investigate the subjective patient experience of delirium, delirium-related distress, and delirium management in ICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study had a qualitative multicenter design applying individual interviews and thematic analysis. Participants were critically ill adult patients that were determined delirium positive according to validated delirium screening tools during ICU admission. The interviews were conducted after ICU discharge when patients were delirium-free as assessed by the \"Rapid clinical test for delirium\" (4AT) and able to participate in an interview.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 30 patients choosing the main themes deductively: Delirium experience; Delirium related distress; and Delirium management. Despite variations in recollection detail, ICU survivors consistently reported delirium-related distress during and after their ICU stay, manifesting as temporal confusion, misinterpretations, and a sense of distrust towards ICU staff. Delusions were characterized by a blend of factual and fictional elements. Impaired short-term memory hindered communication and intensified feelings of isolation, neglect, and loss of control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ICU survivors in our study recalled delirium as an unpleasant and frightening experience, often leading to delirium-related distress during and after their ICU stay, indicating the necessity for enhanced assessment and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"1050-1058"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) experience delirium. Understanding the patient perspective of delirium is important to improve care and reduce suffering. The aim of our study was to investigate the subjective patient experience of delirium, delirium-related distress, and delirium management in ICU.

Methods: Our study had a qualitative multicenter design applying individual interviews and thematic analysis. Participants were critically ill adult patients that were determined delirium positive according to validated delirium screening tools during ICU admission. The interviews were conducted after ICU discharge when patients were delirium-free as assessed by the "Rapid clinical test for delirium" (4AT) and able to participate in an interview.

Results: We interviewed 30 patients choosing the main themes deductively: Delirium experience; Delirium related distress; and Delirium management. Despite variations in recollection detail, ICU survivors consistently reported delirium-related distress during and after their ICU stay, manifesting as temporal confusion, misinterpretations, and a sense of distrust towards ICU staff. Delusions were characterized by a blend of factual and fictional elements. Impaired short-term memory hindered communication and intensified feelings of isolation, neglect, and loss of control.

Conclusion: The ICU survivors in our study recalled delirium as an unpleasant and frightening experience, often leading to delirium-related distress during and after their ICU stay, indicating the necessity for enhanced assessment and treatment.

病人对重症监护谵妄的回忆:定性调查。
背景:许多重症监护病房(ICU)的病人都会出现谵妄。了解患者对谵妄的看法对于改善护理和减少痛苦非常重要。我们的研究旨在调查患者对谵妄的主观感受、与谵妄相关的痛苦以及重症监护病房的谵妄管理:我们的研究采用定性多中心设计,应用了个人访谈和主题分析。研究对象为重症监护室收治的成年重症患者,这些患者在入院时通过有效的谵妄筛查工具被确定为谵妄阳性。访谈在重症监护室出院后进行,当时患者通过 "谵妄快速临床测试"(4AT)评估已无谵妄,可以参加访谈:我们对 30 名患者进行了访谈,通过演绎法选择了主要的主题:结果:我们对 30 名患者进行了访谈,选择了演绎法的主要主题:谵妄经历、谵妄相关痛苦和谵妄管理。尽管在回忆细节方面存在差异,但重症监护室幸存者一致报告了在重症监护室住院期间和之后与谵妄相关的痛苦,表现为时间上的混乱、误解以及对重症监护室工作人员的不信任。妄想的特点是融合了事实和虚构的元素。受损的短期记忆阻碍了沟通,加剧了孤立感、被忽视感和失控感:在我们的研究中,重症监护室幸存者回忆起谵妄是一种令人不愉快和恐惧的经历,往往会在重症监护室住院期间和之后导致与谵妄相关的痛苦,这表明有必要加强评估和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信