Identifying Drivers and Barriers to Precepting Midwifery Students: “A Little Part of Me Lives on in Each Student Midwife”

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Julie Blumenfeld CNM, DNP, Amy Alspaugh CNM, PhD, Lindsay Wright MBS, Laura Lindberg PhD
{"title":"Identifying Drivers and Barriers to Precepting Midwifery Students: “A Little Part of Me Lives on in Each Student Midwife”","authors":"Julie Blumenfeld CNM, DNP,&nbsp;Amy Alspaugh CNM, PhD,&nbsp;Lindsay Wright MBS,&nbsp;Laura Lindberg PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Increased access to midwifery care is one strategy that could improve perinatal health outcomes and help address the maternal health crisis in the United States. A modifiable barrier to increasing the workforce is greater access to midwifery preceptors for clinical training. The objective of this research is to use the socioecological framework to identify midwives’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to precepting students in clinical areas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Midwives attending a preceptor education and training workshop series responded to 3 different questions at the end of each session: (1) What makes precepting midwifery students challenging? (2) What makes precepting midwifery students possible? and (3) What makes precepting midwifery students worthwhile? Responses were coded to align with the socioecological framework, which distinguishes individual, interpersonal, community, institutional, and policy-level influences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Midwives’ responses were spread across the levels of the socioecological model except for policy. Participants identified institutional influences such as support as factors that made precepting feasible, both individual and interpersonal factors such as time constraints as areas that presented challenges to precepting, and community factors, like the joy of sharing midwifery, contributing to what made precepting worthwhile.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Multiple levels of influence were identified in the preceptor process. Participants were internally motivated to precept while also articulating that to make precepting possible, there is a need for support from both colleagues and the greater systems within which they worked. Further studies are needed to investigate an ecosystem that facilitates an effective and sustainable model for midwifery precepting. Additionally, there is a need for efforts to engage and educate midwives in clinical practice about government advocacy that could actualize policy initiatives to support clinical midwifery education.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.13654","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.13654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Increased access to midwifery care is one strategy that could improve perinatal health outcomes and help address the maternal health crisis in the United States. A modifiable barrier to increasing the workforce is greater access to midwifery preceptors for clinical training. The objective of this research is to use the socioecological framework to identify midwives’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to precepting students in clinical areas.

Methods

Midwives attending a preceptor education and training workshop series responded to 3 different questions at the end of each session: (1) What makes precepting midwifery students challenging? (2) What makes precepting midwifery students possible? and (3) What makes precepting midwifery students worthwhile? Responses were coded to align with the socioecological framework, which distinguishes individual, interpersonal, community, institutional, and policy-level influences.

Results

Midwives’ responses were spread across the levels of the socioecological model except for policy. Participants identified institutional influences such as support as factors that made precepting feasible, both individual and interpersonal factors such as time constraints as areas that presented challenges to precepting, and community factors, like the joy of sharing midwifery, contributing to what made precepting worthwhile.

Discussion

Multiple levels of influence were identified in the preceptor process. Participants were internally motivated to precept while also articulating that to make precepting possible, there is a need for support from both colleagues and the greater systems within which they worked. Further studies are needed to investigate an ecosystem that facilitates an effective and sustainable model for midwifery precepting. Additionally, there is a need for efforts to engage and educate midwives in clinical practice about government advocacy that could actualize policy initiatives to support clinical midwifery education.

Abstract Image

确定助产士学生实习的动力和障碍:"每个助产士学生身上都有我的影子"。
导言:增加获得助产护理的机会是一项可改善围产期健康结果并帮助解决美国孕产妇健康危机的策略。增加助产士队伍的一个可改变的障碍是更容易获得助产士戒律者的临床培训。本研究的目的是利用社会生态框架来确定助产士对在临床领域对学生进行戒律培训的障碍和促进因素的看法:方法:参加训导员教育和培训系列研讨会的助产士在每次会议结束时回答了 3 个不同的问题:(1)是什么使助产士学生的训导工作具有挑战性?(2)是什么使助产士学生的实习成为可能? (3)是什么使助产士学生的实习成为值得?根据社会生态框架对回答进行编码,该框架区分了个人、人际、社区、机构和政策层面的影响因素:除政策外,助产士的回答遍及社会生态模型的各个层面。参与者认为,机构影响(如支持)是使受聘成为可行的因素,个人和人际因素(如时间限制)是对受聘提出挑战的领域,而社区因素(如分享助产的快乐)是使受聘成为值得的因素:讨论:戒护过程中发现了多个层面的影响因素。参加者有进行预任的内在动机,同时也阐明了要使预任成为可能,需要来自同事和他们工作所在的更大系统的支持。我们需要进一步研究助产士实习的有效和可持续模式的生态系统。此外,还需要努力让临床实践中的助产士参与到政府倡导的工作中来,并对她们进行相关教育,从而使支持临床助产教育的政策措施落到实处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信