A cross-cultural study of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for people with hearing impairment

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Stacey Theocharous MClinNeuro, Greg Savage PhD, Anna Pavlina Charalambous PhD, Mathieu Côté MD, Renaud David MD, Kathleen Gallant PhD, Catherine Helmer MD, Robert Laforce MD, PhD, Iracema Leroi MD, PhD, Ralph N. Martins PhD, Ziad Nasreddine MD, Antonis Politis MD, PhD, David Reeves Bsc, PhD, Gregor Russell MD, Marie-Josée Sirois PhD, Hamid R. Sohrabi PhD, Chyrssoula Thodi PhD, Christiane Völter MD, PhD, Wai Kent Yeung PhD, Piers Dawes PhD
{"title":"A cross-cultural study of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for people with hearing impairment","authors":"Stacey Theocharous MClinNeuro,&nbsp;Greg Savage PhD,&nbsp;Anna Pavlina Charalambous PhD,&nbsp;Mathieu Côté MD,&nbsp;Renaud David MD,&nbsp;Kathleen Gallant PhD,&nbsp;Catherine Helmer MD,&nbsp;Robert Laforce MD, PhD,&nbsp;Iracema Leroi MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ralph N. Martins PhD,&nbsp;Ziad Nasreddine MD,&nbsp;Antonis Politis MD, PhD,&nbsp;David Reeves Bsc, PhD,&nbsp;Gregor Russell MD,&nbsp;Marie-Josée Sirois PhD,&nbsp;Hamid R. Sohrabi PhD,&nbsp;Chyrssoula Thodi PhD,&nbsp;Christiane Völter MD, PhD,&nbsp;Wai Kent Yeung PhD,&nbsp;Piers Dawes PhD","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cognitive screening tools enable the detection of cognitive impairment, facilitate timely intervention, inform clinical care, and allow long-term planning. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment for people with hearing impairment (MoCA-H) was developed as a reliable cognitive screening tool for people with hearing loss. Using the same methodology across four languages, this study examined whether cultural or linguistic factors affect the performance of the MoCA-H.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The current study investigated the performance of the MoCA-H across English, German, French, and Greek language groups (<i>n</i> = 385) controlling for demographic factors known to affect the performance of the MoCA-H.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In a multiple regression model accounting for age, sex, and education, cultural–linguistic group accounted for 6.89% of variance in the total MoCA-H score. Differences between languages in mean score of up to 2.6 points were observed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Cultural or linguistic factors have a clinically significant impact on the performance of the MoCA-H such that optimal performance cut points for identification of cognitive impairment derived in English-speaking populations are likely inappropriate for use in non-English speaking populations. To ensure reliable identification of cognitive impairment, it is essential that locally appropriate performance cut points are established for each translation of the MoCA-H.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cognitive screening tools enable the detection of cognitive impairment, facilitate timely intervention, inform clinical care, and allow long-term planning. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment for people with hearing impairment (MoCA-H) was developed as a reliable cognitive screening tool for people with hearing loss. Using the same methodology across four languages, this study examined whether cultural or linguistic factors affect the performance of the MoCA-H.

Methods

The current study investigated the performance of the MoCA-H across English, German, French, and Greek language groups (n = 385) controlling for demographic factors known to affect the performance of the MoCA-H.

Results

In a multiple regression model accounting for age, sex, and education, cultural–linguistic group accounted for 6.89% of variance in the total MoCA-H score. Differences between languages in mean score of up to 2.6 points were observed.

Conclusions

Cultural or linguistic factors have a clinically significant impact on the performance of the MoCA-H such that optimal performance cut points for identification of cognitive impairment derived in English-speaking populations are likely inappropriate for use in non-English speaking populations. To ensure reliable identification of cognitive impairment, it is essential that locally appropriate performance cut points are established for each translation of the MoCA-H.

Abstract Image

针对听力障碍人士的蒙特利尔认知评估跨文化研究。
背景:认知筛查工具能够发现认知障碍,便于及时干预,为临床护理提供信息,并进行长期规划。蒙特利尔听力障碍者认知评估(MoCA-H)是为听力损失者开发的一种可靠的认知筛查工具。本研究采用四种语言的相同方法,考察了文化或语言因素是否会影响 MoCA-H 的表现:本研究调查了MoCA-H在英语、德语、法语和希腊语语言组(n = 385)中的表现,并控制了已知会影响MoCA-H表现的人口统计学因素:在考虑年龄、性别和教育程度的多元回归模型中,文化语言组占 MoCA-H 总分方差的 6.89%。不同语言之间的平均得分差异高达 2.6 分:文化或语言因素对 MoCA-H 的表现有显著的临床影响,因此,在英语国家人群中得出的识别认知障碍的最佳表现切点很可能不适合在非英语国家人群中使用。为确保可靠地识别认知障碍,必须为 MoCA-H 的每种翻译确定适合当地的表现切点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信