Stacey Theocharous MClinNeuro, Greg Savage PhD, Anna Pavlina Charalambous PhD, Mathieu Côté MD, Renaud David MD, Kathleen Gallant PhD, Catherine Helmer MD, Robert Laforce MD, PhD, Iracema Leroi MD, PhD, Ralph N. Martins PhD, Ziad Nasreddine MD, Antonis Politis MD, PhD, David Reeves Bsc, PhD, Gregor Russell MD, Marie-Josée Sirois PhD, Hamid R. Sohrabi PhD, Chyrssoula Thodi PhD, Christiane Völter MD, PhD, Wai Kent Yeung PhD, Piers Dawes PhD
{"title":"A cross-cultural study of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for people with hearing impairment","authors":"Stacey Theocharous MClinNeuro, Greg Savage PhD, Anna Pavlina Charalambous PhD, Mathieu Côté MD, Renaud David MD, Kathleen Gallant PhD, Catherine Helmer MD, Robert Laforce MD, PhD, Iracema Leroi MD, PhD, Ralph N. Martins PhD, Ziad Nasreddine MD, Antonis Politis MD, PhD, David Reeves Bsc, PhD, Gregor Russell MD, Marie-Josée Sirois PhD, Hamid R. Sohrabi PhD, Chyrssoula Thodi PhD, Christiane Völter MD, PhD, Wai Kent Yeung PhD, Piers Dawes PhD","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cognitive screening tools enable the detection of cognitive impairment, facilitate timely intervention, inform clinical care, and allow long-term planning. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment for people with hearing impairment (MoCA-H) was developed as a reliable cognitive screening tool for people with hearing loss. Using the same methodology across four languages, this study examined whether cultural or linguistic factors affect the performance of the MoCA-H.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The current study investigated the performance of the MoCA-H across English, German, French, and Greek language groups (<i>n</i> = 385) controlling for demographic factors known to affect the performance of the MoCA-H.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In a multiple regression model accounting for age, sex, and education, cultural–linguistic group accounted for 6.89% of variance in the total MoCA-H score. Differences between languages in mean score of up to 2.6 points were observed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Cultural or linguistic factors have a clinically significant impact on the performance of the MoCA-H such that optimal performance cut points for identification of cognitive impairment derived in English-speaking populations are likely inappropriate for use in non-English speaking populations. To ensure reliable identification of cognitive impairment, it is essential that locally appropriate performance cut points are established for each translation of the MoCA-H.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Cognitive screening tools enable the detection of cognitive impairment, facilitate timely intervention, inform clinical care, and allow long-term planning. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment for people with hearing impairment (MoCA-H) was developed as a reliable cognitive screening tool for people with hearing loss. Using the same methodology across four languages, this study examined whether cultural or linguistic factors affect the performance of the MoCA-H.
Methods
The current study investigated the performance of the MoCA-H across English, German, French, and Greek language groups (n = 385) controlling for demographic factors known to affect the performance of the MoCA-H.
Results
In a multiple regression model accounting for age, sex, and education, cultural–linguistic group accounted for 6.89% of variance in the total MoCA-H score. Differences between languages in mean score of up to 2.6 points were observed.
Conclusions
Cultural or linguistic factors have a clinically significant impact on the performance of the MoCA-H such that optimal performance cut points for identification of cognitive impairment derived in English-speaking populations are likely inappropriate for use in non-English speaking populations. To ensure reliable identification of cognitive impairment, it is essential that locally appropriate performance cut points are established for each translation of the MoCA-H.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.