Development and verification of the Korean version of the genetic counseling self-efficacy scale.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Sunhee Tak, Beom Hee Lee, In Hee Choi
{"title":"Development and verification of the Korean version of the genetic counseling self-efficacy scale.","authors":"Sunhee Tak, Beom Hee Lee, In Hee Choi","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.1933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A self-reported Genetic Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale (GCSES) was developed in English to measure genetic counselors' self-efficacy, a factor known to affect their job performance. This study verified the reliability and validity of the GCSES for use in Korea. The scale was translated and back-translated into Korean for cultural fit verification. Expert analysis was performed to ensure content validity. For construct validity, a confirmatory factor analysis of the six-factor structures of the GCSES and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the K-GCSES were conducted. To confirm the convergent validity and discriminant validity of the items, a multitrait/multi-item matrix analysis of the relationship between items and subscales was conducted. The reliability was evaluated by examining internal consistency and test-retest reliability. A total of 62 participants were recruited from certified genetic counselors associated with the Korean Society of Medical Genetics and Genomics and from four graduate schools offering genetic counseling programs. Confirmatory factor analysis showed an inadequate fit to the original GCSES structure. Through EFA, three-factor structures were identified: \"counseling competence and psychosocial skills,\" \"genetic testing,\" and \"information gathering.\" Of the original 38 GCSES items, five were removed due to low factor loadings and small inter-item correlations. The item convergent validity and discriminant validity of the Korean version of the GCSES were established, and the correlation between the subfactors showed statistical significance (0.711-0.983). Cronbach's alpha was 0.985, and the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.882 to 0.897, securing reliability. The K-GCSES has a three-factor structure with acceptable reliability and sufficient validity. Differences in the factor structure between the K-GCSES and GCSES may be due to cultural factors. K-GCSES can be used as a tool to evaluate the competence of genetic counselors and genetic counseling students in Korea and to improve the quality of professionalism and education.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1933","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A self-reported Genetic Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale (GCSES) was developed in English to measure genetic counselors' self-efficacy, a factor known to affect their job performance. This study verified the reliability and validity of the GCSES for use in Korea. The scale was translated and back-translated into Korean for cultural fit verification. Expert analysis was performed to ensure content validity. For construct validity, a confirmatory factor analysis of the six-factor structures of the GCSES and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the K-GCSES were conducted. To confirm the convergent validity and discriminant validity of the items, a multitrait/multi-item matrix analysis of the relationship between items and subscales was conducted. The reliability was evaluated by examining internal consistency and test-retest reliability. A total of 62 participants were recruited from certified genetic counselors associated with the Korean Society of Medical Genetics and Genomics and from four graduate schools offering genetic counseling programs. Confirmatory factor analysis showed an inadequate fit to the original GCSES structure. Through EFA, three-factor structures were identified: "counseling competence and psychosocial skills," "genetic testing," and "information gathering." Of the original 38 GCSES items, five were removed due to low factor loadings and small inter-item correlations. The item convergent validity and discriminant validity of the Korean version of the GCSES were established, and the correlation between the subfactors showed statistical significance (0.711-0.983). Cronbach's alpha was 0.985, and the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.882 to 0.897, securing reliability. The K-GCSES has a three-factor structure with acceptable reliability and sufficient validity. Differences in the factor structure between the K-GCSES and GCSES may be due to cultural factors. K-GCSES can be used as a tool to evaluate the competence of genetic counselors and genetic counseling students in Korea and to improve the quality of professionalism and education.

遗传咨询自我效能感量表韩文版的开发与验证。
本研究用英语编制了一份自我报告的遗传咨询自我效能量表(GCSES),用于测量遗传咨询师的自我效能,这是一个已知会影响其工作表现的因素。本研究验证了 GCSES 在韩国使用的可靠性和有效性。该量表被翻译成韩文,并反译成韩文,以验证其文化适应性。为确保内容效度,进行了专家分析。为了确保建构效度,我们对 GCSES 的六因素结构进行了确认性因素分析,并对 K-GCSES 进行了探索性因素分析 (EFA)。为了确认项目的收敛效度和区分效度,我们对项目和分量表之间的关系进行了多特质/多项目矩阵分析。信度则通过内部一致性和重测信度进行评估。研究人员从韩国医学遗传学和基因组学学会的认证遗传咨询师和四所开设遗传咨询课程的研究生院中招募了 62 名参与者。确认性因子分析显示,原始的 GCSES 结构不够拟合。通过 EFA,确定了三个因子结构:"咨询能力和社会心理技能"、"基因检测 "和 "信息收集"。在最初的 38 个 GCSES 项目中,有 5 个因因子负荷低和项目间相关性小而被删除。韩国版 GCSES 的项目收敛效度和判别效度均已确定,各子因子之间的相关性显示出统计学意义(0.711-0.983)。Cronbach's alpha 为 0.985,类内相关系数为 0.882 至 0.897,确保了信度。K-GCSES 具有三因素结构,具有可接受的信度和充分的效度。K-GCSES 与 GCSES 在因子结构上的差异可能是由文化因素造成的。K-GCSES 可用作评估韩国遗传咨询师和遗传咨询专业学生能力的工具,以提高专业水平和教育质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信