Smartwatch-Based Interventions for People With Dementia: User-Centered Design Approach.

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.2196/50107
Doreen Goerss, Stefanie Köhler, Eleonora Rong, Anna Gesine Temp, Ingo Kilimann, Gerald Bieber, Stefan Teipel
{"title":"Smartwatch-Based Interventions for People With Dementia: User-Centered Design Approach.","authors":"Doreen Goerss, Stefanie Köhler, Eleonora Rong, Anna Gesine Temp, Ingo Kilimann, Gerald Bieber, Stefan Teipel","doi":"10.2196/50107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assistive technologies can help people living with dementia maintain their everyday activities. Nevertheless, there is a gap between the potential and use of these materials. Involving future users may help close this gap, but the impact on people with dementia is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to determine if user-centered development of smartwatch-based interventions together with people with dementia is feasible. In addition, we evaluated the extent to which user feedback is plausible and therefore helpful for technological improvements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the interactions between smartwatches and people with dementia or people with mild cognitive impairment. All participants were prompted to complete 2 tasks (drinking water and a specific cognitive task). Prompts were triggered using a smartphone as a remote control and were repeated up to 3 times if participants failed to complete a task. Overall, 50% (20/40) of the participants received regular prompts, and 50% (20/40) received intensive audiovisual prompts to perform everyday tasks. Participants' reactions were observed remotely via cameras. User feedback was captured via questionnaires, which included topics like usability, design, usefulness, and concerns. The internal consistency of the subscales was calculated. Plausibility was also checked using qualitative approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants noted their preferences for particular functions and improvements. Patients struggled with rating using the Likert scale; therefore, we assisted them with completing the questionnaire. Usability (mean 78 out of 100, SD 15.22) and usefulness (mean 9 out of 12) were rated high. The smartwatch design was appealing to most participants (31/40, 76%). Only a few participants (6/40, 15%) were concerned about using the watch. Better usability was associated with better cognition. The observed success and self-rated task comprehension were in agreement for most participants (32/40, 80%). In different qualitative analyses, participants' responses were, in most cases, plausible. Only 8% (3/40) of the participants were completely unaware of their irregular task performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People with dementia can have positive experiences with smartwatches. Most people with dementia provided valuable information. Developing assistive technologies together with people with dementia can help to prioritize the future development of functional and nonfunctional features.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e50107"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/50107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assistive technologies can help people living with dementia maintain their everyday activities. Nevertheless, there is a gap between the potential and use of these materials. Involving future users may help close this gap, but the impact on people with dementia is unclear.

Objective: We aimed to determine if user-centered development of smartwatch-based interventions together with people with dementia is feasible. In addition, we evaluated the extent to which user feedback is plausible and therefore helpful for technological improvements.

Methods: We examined the interactions between smartwatches and people with dementia or people with mild cognitive impairment. All participants were prompted to complete 2 tasks (drinking water and a specific cognitive task). Prompts were triggered using a smartphone as a remote control and were repeated up to 3 times if participants failed to complete a task. Overall, 50% (20/40) of the participants received regular prompts, and 50% (20/40) received intensive audiovisual prompts to perform everyday tasks. Participants' reactions were observed remotely via cameras. User feedback was captured via questionnaires, which included topics like usability, design, usefulness, and concerns. The internal consistency of the subscales was calculated. Plausibility was also checked using qualitative approaches.

Results: Participants noted their preferences for particular functions and improvements. Patients struggled with rating using the Likert scale; therefore, we assisted them with completing the questionnaire. Usability (mean 78 out of 100, SD 15.22) and usefulness (mean 9 out of 12) were rated high. The smartwatch design was appealing to most participants (31/40, 76%). Only a few participants (6/40, 15%) were concerned about using the watch. Better usability was associated with better cognition. The observed success and self-rated task comprehension were in agreement for most participants (32/40, 80%). In different qualitative analyses, participants' responses were, in most cases, plausible. Only 8% (3/40) of the participants were completely unaware of their irregular task performance.

Conclusions: People with dementia can have positive experiences with smartwatches. Most people with dementia provided valuable information. Developing assistive technologies together with people with dementia can help to prioritize the future development of functional and nonfunctional features.

基于智能手表的痴呆症患者干预措施:以用户为中心的设计方法。
背景:辅助技术可以帮助痴呆症患者维持日常活动。然而,在这些材料的潜力和使用之间还存在差距。让未来的用户参与进来可能有助于缩小这一差距,但对痴呆症患者的影响尚不明确:我们旨在确定以用户为中心与痴呆症患者共同开发基于智能手表的干预措施是否可行。此外,我们还评估了用户反馈在多大程度上是可信的,从而有助于技术改进:我们研究了智能手表与痴呆症患者或轻度认知障碍患者之间的互动。所有参与者在提示下完成两项任务(喝水和一项特定的认知任务)。使用智能手机作为遥控器触发提示,如果参与者未能完成任务,则会重复最多 3 次。总体而言,50%(20/40)的参与者接受了常规提示,50%(20/40)的参与者在完成日常任务时接受了强化视听提示。通过摄像头远程观察参与者的反应。通过调查问卷收集用户反馈,其中包括可用性、设计、有用性和关注点等主题。计算了各分量表的内部一致性。此外,还采用定性方法对合理性进行了检查:结果:参与者指出了他们对特定功能和改进的偏好。患者在使用李克特量表评分时很费劲,因此我们协助他们完成了问卷。可用性(平均 78 分,满分 100 分,标准差 15.22 分)和实用性(平均 9 分,满分 12 分)的评分都很高。智能手表的设计吸引了大多数参与者(31/40,76%)。只有少数参与者(6/40,15%)对手表的使用感到担忧。更好的可用性与更好的认知相关。大多数参与者(32/40,80%)观察到的成功率和自我评价的任务理解能力是一致的。在不同的定性分析中,参与者的回答在大多数情况下都是可信的。只有 8%(3/40)的参与者完全不知道自己的任务表现不正常:结论:痴呆症患者在使用智能手表时会有积极的体验。大多数痴呆症患者都提供了有价值的信息。与痴呆症患者共同开发辅助技术有助于确定未来功能性和非功能性特征开发的优先次序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信