Gender Differences in Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Marcello Maida, Alessandro Vitello, Angelo Zullo, Daryl Ramai, Antonio Facciorusso, Roberto Vassallo
{"title":"Gender Differences in Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Marcello Maida, Alessandro Vitello, Angelo Zullo, Daryl Ramai, Antonio Facciorusso, Roberto Vassallo","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bowel cleansing is a key element for a quality colonoscopy. Despite recent advances, not all predictors of successful cleansing are fully known. This post hoc analysis of an RCT aims to explore gender differences in bowel cleansing quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The \"OVER\" trial was a multicenter phase-4 RCT including 478 patients randomized 1:1 to receive split-dose 1L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate (PEG+ASC) or 4L-PEG. In this post hoc analysis, multivariable logistic regression models were designed to assess predictors of cleansing success (CS) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) by gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 478 randomized patients, 50.2% were males and 49.8% females.Overall, CS was comparable between females and males (87.1% vs 88.4, P = 0.6), whereas CS in the right (95.7% vs 90.9, P = 0.049) and transverse colon (98.6% vs 93.9, P=0.011) was significantly higher in females.At multivariable regression analysis for CS outpatient setting (OR = 5.558) and higher withdrawal time (OR = 1.294) were independently associated with CS in females, whereas screening/surveillance indication (OR = 6.776) was independently associated with CS in males.At multivariable regression analysis for ADR, running time <5 hours (OR = 3.014) and higher withdrawal time (OR = 1.250) were independently associated with ADR in females, whereas older age (OR = 1.040) and higher withdrawal time (OR = 1.093) were independently associated with ADR in males.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed different results in bowel preparation quality and different predictors of CS and ADR by gender. These findings suggest the need for further research to explore gender-specific approaches for bowel preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Bowel cleansing is a key element for a quality colonoscopy. Despite recent advances, not all predictors of successful cleansing are fully known. This post hoc analysis of an RCT aims to explore gender differences in bowel cleansing quality.

Methods: The "OVER" trial was a multicenter phase-4 RCT including 478 patients randomized 1:1 to receive split-dose 1L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate (PEG+ASC) or 4L-PEG. In this post hoc analysis, multivariable logistic regression models were designed to assess predictors of cleansing success (CS) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) by gender.

Results: Of the 478 randomized patients, 50.2% were males and 49.8% females.Overall, CS was comparable between females and males (87.1% vs 88.4, P = 0.6), whereas CS in the right (95.7% vs 90.9, P = 0.049) and transverse colon (98.6% vs 93.9, P=0.011) was significantly higher in females.At multivariable regression analysis for CS outpatient setting (OR = 5.558) and higher withdrawal time (OR = 1.294) were independently associated with CS in females, whereas screening/surveillance indication (OR = 6.776) was independently associated with CS in males.At multivariable regression analysis for ADR, running time <5 hours (OR = 3.014) and higher withdrawal time (OR = 1.250) were independently associated with ADR in females, whereas older age (OR = 1.040) and higher withdrawal time (OR = 1.093) were independently associated with ADR in males.

Conclusions: This study showed different results in bowel preparation quality and different predictors of CS and ADR by gender. These findings suggest the need for further research to explore gender-specific approaches for bowel preparation.

结肠镜检查肠道准备质量的性别差异:随机对照试验的事后分析。
目的:肠道清洁是高质量结肠镜检查的关键因素。尽管最近取得了进展,但并不是所有成功清洁的预测因素都完全清楚。本研究对一项临床试验进行了事后分析,旨在探讨肠道清洁质量的性别差异:OVER "试验是一项多中心第四阶段 RCT,包括 478 名患者,以 1:1 随机分配接受分剂量 1 升聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸(PEG+ASC)或 4 升 PEG。在这项事后分析中,设计了多变量逻辑回归模型,以评估按性别划分的清洗成功率(CS)和腺瘤检出率(ADR)的预测因素:总体而言,女性和男性的清洗成功率相当(87.1% vs 88.4,P=0.6),而女性右侧(95.7% vs 90.9,P=0.049)和横结肠(98.6% vs 93.9,P=0.011)的清洗成功率明显更高。在 CS 的多变量回归分析中,门诊环境(OR = 5.558)和较长的停药时间(OR = 1.294)与女性的 CS 独立相关,而筛查/监测指征(OR = 6.776)与男性的 CS 独立相关:这项研究显示,不同性别的人在肠道准备质量方面的结果不同,CS 和 ADR 的预测因素也不同。这些发现表明,有必要进一步研究探索针对不同性别的肠道准备方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信