Post-Operative Hyperextension Bracing Has the Potential to Reduce Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: A Propensity Matched Analysis of Braced versus Non-braced Cohorts.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1177/21925682241260278
Pratyush Shahi, Robert K Merrill, Anthony Pajak, Justin T Samuel, Izzet Akosman, John C Clohisy, Jerry Du, Bo Zhang, Jonathan Elysee, David N Kim, Yusef Jordan, Rachel L Knopp, Francis C Lovecchio, Han Jo Kim
{"title":"Post-Operative Hyperextension Bracing Has the Potential to Reduce Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: A Propensity Matched Analysis of Braced versus Non-braced Cohorts.","authors":"Pratyush Shahi, Robert K Merrill, Anthony Pajak, Justin T Samuel, Izzet Akosman, John C Clohisy, Jerry Du, Bo Zhang, Jonathan Elysee, David N Kim, Yusef Jordan, Rachel L Knopp, Francis C Lovecchio, Han Jo Kim","doi":"10.1177/21925682241260278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort.ObjectiveDetermine effects of bracing on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) after adult deformity correction.MethodsPatients were identified from a single-surgeon dataset of posterior-only fusions for ASD (pelvis to UIV of T9-12) with a minimum of 1-year follow up. Starting in 2021, all lower thoracic fusions were braced using a hyperextension brace. Patients wore the brace at all times (unless in bed) for the first 6 weeks after surgery. A 1:1 propensity-match was performed based on age, number of levels, 3 column osteotomies, and magnitude of correction to identify a comparative non-braced cohort.Results141 patients (113 non-brace, 28 brace) were evaluated. After matching, 56 patients were identified to form similar cohorts. Non-matched and matched groups had no statistically significant differences in demographics, comorbid conditions, surgical characteristics (except shorter operative time and lower EBL in the braced group), and preoperative radiographic parameters. For the overall cohort, the change in proximal junctional angle at 1-year was higher in the non-braced group (7.6° vs 8.1°, <i>P</i> = .047), and non-braced patients had a higher incidence of PJK at 1-year in both the overall cohort (36% vs 14%, <i>P</i> = .045) and matched cohort (43% vs 14%, <i>P</i> = .038). There was no difference in proximal junctional failure between groups.ConclusionThis pilot study shows that our protocol for extension bracing may reduce rates of PJK. These findings can form the basis for future multi-center trials examining the effect of extension bracing on junctional complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1695-1702"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241260278","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective cohort.ObjectiveDetermine effects of bracing on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) after adult deformity correction.MethodsPatients were identified from a single-surgeon dataset of posterior-only fusions for ASD (pelvis to UIV of T9-12) with a minimum of 1-year follow up. Starting in 2021, all lower thoracic fusions were braced using a hyperextension brace. Patients wore the brace at all times (unless in bed) for the first 6 weeks after surgery. A 1:1 propensity-match was performed based on age, number of levels, 3 column osteotomies, and magnitude of correction to identify a comparative non-braced cohort.Results141 patients (113 non-brace, 28 brace) were evaluated. After matching, 56 patients were identified to form similar cohorts. Non-matched and matched groups had no statistically significant differences in demographics, comorbid conditions, surgical characteristics (except shorter operative time and lower EBL in the braced group), and preoperative radiographic parameters. For the overall cohort, the change in proximal junctional angle at 1-year was higher in the non-braced group (7.6° vs 8.1°, P = .047), and non-braced patients had a higher incidence of PJK at 1-year in both the overall cohort (36% vs 14%, P = .045) and matched cohort (43% vs 14%, P = .038). There was no difference in proximal junctional failure between groups.ConclusionThis pilot study shows that our protocol for extension bracing may reduce rates of PJK. These findings can form the basis for future multi-center trials examining the effect of extension bracing on junctional complications.

术后过伸支撑有可能减少近端交界性脊柱后凸:支撑与非支撑队列的倾向匹配分析。
研究设计回顾性队列:确定支撑对成人畸形矫正后近端交界性脊柱后凸(PJK)的影响:从单个外科医生的后路融合治疗 ASD(骨盆至 T9-12 的 UIV)数据集中确定至少随访 1 年的患者。自2021年起,所有下胸椎融合术均使用过伸支架进行支撑。患者在术后的前 6 周内(除非卧床)始终佩戴支撑架。根据年龄、水平数、3柱截骨术和矫正幅度进行1:1倾向匹配,以确定非支撑架对比队列:共评估了 141 名患者(113 名无支架患者,28 名有支架患者)。经过配对后,56 名患者被确定为相似队列。非配对组和配对组在人口统计学、合并症、手术特征(除了支撑组的手术时间更短和 EBL 更低)和术前放射学参数方面没有统计学意义上的显著差异。在总体队列中,无支具组近端交界角度在 1 年后的变化更大(7.6° vs 8.1°,P = .047),在总体队列(36% vs 14%,P = .045)和匹配队列(43% vs 14%,P = .038)中,无支具组患者在 1 年后的 PJK 发生率更高。各组间近端连接失败率无差异:这项试点研究表明,我们的伸展支具方案可降低 PJK 的发生率。结论:这项试验研究表明,我们的伸展支撑方案可以降低 PJK 的发生率,这些研究结果可以作为未来多中心试验的基础,以检验伸展支撑对交界处并发症的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信