Preclinical testing of expired antivenoms and its uses in real-world experience: a systematic review.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Sutinee Soopairin, Chanthawat Patikorn, Suthira Taychakhoonavudh
{"title":"Preclinical testing of expired antivenoms and its uses in real-world experience: a systematic review.","authors":"Sutinee Soopairin, Chanthawat Patikorn, Suthira Taychakhoonavudh","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Limited access to antivenoms is a global challenge in treating snakebite envenoming. In emergency situations where non-expired antivenoms are not readily available, expired antivenoms may be used to save lives with the risk of deteriorating quality, efficacy and safety. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review and summarise the sparse preclinical evidence of neutralising efficacy of expired antivenoms and real-world experience of using expired antivenoms in humans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for articles published until 1 March 2023 in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase. Studies demonstrating the preclinical studies evaluating expired antivenoms or studies describing the real-world experience of using expired antivenoms were included. Narrative synthesis was applied to summarise the evidence of expired antivenoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were included. Ten were preclinical studies and five were real-world experiences of using expired antivenoms in humans. The expired duration of antivenoms in the included studies ranged from 2 months to 20 years. The quality of expired antivenoms was evaluated in one study, and they met the standard quality tests. Five studies demonstrated that the expired antivenoms' immunological concentration and venom-binding activity were comparable to non-expired ones but could gradually deteriorate after expiration. Studies consistently exhibited that expired antivenoms, compared with non-expired antivenoms, were effective when stored in proper storage conditions. The safety profile of using expired antivenoms was reported in two included studies. However, it was inconclusive due to limited information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though the quality and efficacy of expired antivenoms are comparable to non-expired antivenoms in preclinical studies, the information is limited in terms of real-world experiences of using expired antivenoms and their safety. Therefore, the use of expired antivenoms may be generally inconclusive due to scarce data. Further investigations may be needed to support the extension of antivenoms' expiration date according to their potential efficacy after expiration.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"551-559"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2023-213707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Limited access to antivenoms is a global challenge in treating snakebite envenoming. In emergency situations where non-expired antivenoms are not readily available, expired antivenoms may be used to save lives with the risk of deteriorating quality, efficacy and safety. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review and summarise the sparse preclinical evidence of neutralising efficacy of expired antivenoms and real-world experience of using expired antivenoms in humans.

Methods: We searched for articles published until 1 March 2023 in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase. Studies demonstrating the preclinical studies evaluating expired antivenoms or studies describing the real-world experience of using expired antivenoms were included. Narrative synthesis was applied to summarise the evidence of expired antivenoms.

Results: Fifteen studies were included. Ten were preclinical studies and five were real-world experiences of using expired antivenoms in humans. The expired duration of antivenoms in the included studies ranged from 2 months to 20 years. The quality of expired antivenoms was evaluated in one study, and they met the standard quality tests. Five studies demonstrated that the expired antivenoms' immunological concentration and venom-binding activity were comparable to non-expired ones but could gradually deteriorate after expiration. Studies consistently exhibited that expired antivenoms, compared with non-expired antivenoms, were effective when stored in proper storage conditions. The safety profile of using expired antivenoms was reported in two included studies. However, it was inconclusive due to limited information.

Conclusion: Even though the quality and efficacy of expired antivenoms are comparable to non-expired antivenoms in preclinical studies, the information is limited in terms of real-world experiences of using expired antivenoms and their safety. Therefore, the use of expired antivenoms may be generally inconclusive due to scarce data. Further investigations may be needed to support the extension of antivenoms' expiration date according to their potential efficacy after expiration.

过期抗蛇毒血清的临床前测试及其在实际经验中的应用:系统综述。
导言:抗蛇毒血清供应有限是治疗蛇咬伤的一个全球性挑战。在无法随时获得非过期抗蛇毒血清的紧急情况下,可以使用过期抗蛇毒血清来挽救生命,但过期抗蛇毒血清的质量、疗效和安全性可能会下降。因此,我们旨在系统地回顾和总结有关过期抗蛇毒血清中和功效的稀少临床前证据以及在人体中使用过期抗蛇毒血清的实际经验:我们在 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Embase 中检索了 2023 年 3 月 1 日前发表的文章。其中包括展示评估过期抗蛇毒血清的临床前研究或描述使用过期抗蛇毒血清的实际经验的研究。结果:共纳入 15 项研究:结果:共纳入 15 项研究。结果:共纳入 15 项研究,其中 10 项为临床前研究,5 项为在人体中使用过期抗蛇毒血清的实际经验。纳入研究的抗蛇毒血清过期时间从 2 个月到 20 年不等。有一项研究对过期抗蛇毒血清的质量进行了评估,结果符合标准质量检测要求。五项研究表明,过期抗蛇毒血清的免疫浓度和毒液结合活性与未过期抗蛇毒血清相当,但过期后会逐渐变差。研究一致表明,与未过期的抗蛇毒血清相比,过期抗蛇毒血清在适当的储存条件下是有效的。有两项研究报告了使用过期抗蛇毒血清的安全性。结论:尽管过期抗蛇毒血清的质量和疗效都不尽如人意,但其安全性仍然值得关注:结论:尽管在临床前研究中,过期抗蛇毒血清的质量和疗效与非过期抗蛇毒血清相当,但在现实世界中使用过期抗蛇毒血清的经验及其安全性方面的信息却很有限。因此,由于数据稀少,过期抗蛇毒血清的使用总体上可能没有定论。可能需要进行进一步调查,以根据抗蛇毒血清过期后的潜在疗效来支持延长其有效期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信