Uji Beda Keputusan Sinyal Jual Beli Saham Sebelum dan Sesudah Menggunakan Teknik Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) dan Stochastic Oscillator (SO)

Andrian Dwi Nurcahyo, Eni Dwi Susliyanti
{"title":"Uji Beda Keputusan Sinyal Jual Beli Saham Sebelum dan Sesudah Menggunakan Teknik Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) dan Stochastic Oscillator (SO)","authors":"Andrian Dwi Nurcahyo, Eni Dwi Susliyanti","doi":"10.47467/reslaj.v6i6.2268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to partially test whether there are differences in the decision of buy signals and sell signals before and after using the technical analysis of Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) and Stochastic Oscillator (SO) on the LQ45 stock index listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) Banking subsector for the 2018-2022 period. This study used the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test difference test with a total sample of 4 companies. The research method used is quantitative descriptive comparative type with secondary data. Data selection using purposive sampling and processed using IBM SPSS software version 20.0. The results of this study show that there is a difference in the decision of buy signals and sell signals before and after using MACD technical analysis and there is no difference in the decision of buy signals and sell signals before and after using SO technical analysis. So the implication is that MACD is not accurate, while SO is accurate used in buying signals and selling stock signals. The contribution of the results of this study is empirical evidence that investors do not need to always use MACD and need to always use SO in buying signals and selling stock signals.","PeriodicalId":517122,"journal":{"name":"Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal","volume":"18 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v6i6.2268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to partially test whether there are differences in the decision of buy signals and sell signals before and after using the technical analysis of Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) and Stochastic Oscillator (SO) on the LQ45 stock index listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) Banking subsector for the 2018-2022 period. This study used the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test difference test with a total sample of 4 companies. The research method used is quantitative descriptive comparative type with secondary data. Data selection using purposive sampling and processed using IBM SPSS software version 20.0. The results of this study show that there is a difference in the decision of buy signals and sell signals before and after using MACD technical analysis and there is no difference in the decision of buy signals and sell signals before and after using SO technical analysis. So the implication is that MACD is not accurate, while SO is accurate used in buying signals and selling stock signals. The contribution of the results of this study is empirical evidence that investors do not need to always use MACD and need to always use SO in buying signals and selling stock signals.
使用移动平均收敛背离 (MACD) 和随机振荡器 (SO) 技术前后股票买卖信号决策的差异测试
本研究旨在对2018-2022年期间在印度尼西亚证券交易所(IDX)银行子行业上市的LQ45股票指数使用移动平均收敛背离指标(MACD)和随机摆动指标(SO)技术分析前后买入信号和卖出信号的决策是否存在差异进行部分检验。本研究采用 Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test 差异检验法,样本共 4 家公司。采用的研究方法是定量描述性比较法,使用二手数据。数据选择采用目的性抽样,并使用 IBM SPSS 软件 20.0 版进行处理。研究结果表明,使用 MACD 技术分析前后,买入信号和卖出信号的决策存在差异,而使用 SO 技术分析前后,买入信号和卖出信号的决策没有差异。因此,这意味着 MACD 并不准确,而 SO 用于买入信号和卖出股票信号是准确的。本研究结果的贡献在于,通过实证证明了投资者不需要总是使用 MACD,而需要在买入信号和卖出信号中总是使用 SO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信