Bi-Criteria Diverse Plan Selection via Beam Search Approximation

Shanhe Zhong, Pouya Shati, Eldan Cohen
{"title":"Bi-Criteria Diverse Plan Selection via Beam Search Approximation","authors":"Shanhe Zhong, Pouya Shati, Eldan Cohen","doi":"10.1609/socs.v17i1.31557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent work on diverse planning has focused on a two-step setting where the first step consists of generating a large number of plans, and the second step consists of selecting a subset of plans that maximizes diversity. For the second step, previous work has focused on solving a combinatorial optimization problem for diverse subset selection that can be approximated using greedy search. In this work, we propose a flexible, bi-criteria framework for diverse plan selection. Our framework consists of optimizing both quality and diversity, generalizing previous work and providing flexibility to prioritize one objective over the other. We consider two quality and two diversity measures and show that greedy search guarantees an approximation with a constant ratio for certain configurations based on established results in the literature. To allow users to trade off additional computation for better solutions, we introduce a beam search approximation that generalizes the greedy search, and we provide approximation guarantees on the obtained solutions. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments that show that: (1) our flexible bi-criteria framework allows us to obtain solutions of better quality while still maintaining a high degree of diversity; (2) our beam search approximation obtains significant improvement in performance over greedy search and, for a large number of instances, is able to generate solutions that are equal to or better than those obtained by an exact MIP solver with a significantly higher runtime limit.","PeriodicalId":425645,"journal":{"name":"Symposium on Combinatorial Search","volume":"23 9","pages":"188-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium on Combinatorial Search","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/socs.v17i1.31557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent work on diverse planning has focused on a two-step setting where the first step consists of generating a large number of plans, and the second step consists of selecting a subset of plans that maximizes diversity. For the second step, previous work has focused on solving a combinatorial optimization problem for diverse subset selection that can be approximated using greedy search. In this work, we propose a flexible, bi-criteria framework for diverse plan selection. Our framework consists of optimizing both quality and diversity, generalizing previous work and providing flexibility to prioritize one objective over the other. We consider two quality and two diversity measures and show that greedy search guarantees an approximation with a constant ratio for certain configurations based on established results in the literature. To allow users to trade off additional computation for better solutions, we introduce a beam search approximation that generalizes the greedy search, and we provide approximation guarantees on the obtained solutions. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments that show that: (1) our flexible bi-criteria framework allows us to obtain solutions of better quality while still maintaining a high degree of diversity; (2) our beam search approximation obtains significant improvement in performance over greedy search and, for a large number of instances, is able to generate solutions that are equal to or better than those obtained by an exact MIP solver with a significantly higher runtime limit.
通过光束搜索近似法进行双标准多样化计划选择
近期有关多样化规划的工作主要集中在两步设置上,第一步是生成大量计划,第二步是选择一个能最大化多样化的计划子集。对于第二步,以前的工作主要是解决多样化子集选择的组合优化问题,该问题可以用贪婪搜索来近似解决。在这项工作中,我们为多样化计划选择提出了一个灵活的双标准框架。我们的框架包括同时优化质量和多样性,概括了之前的工作,并提供了优先考虑其中一个目标的灵活性。我们考虑了两种质量和两种多样性衡量标准,并根据文献中的既定结果表明,对于某些配置,贪婪搜索能保证一个恒定比率的近似值。为了让用户能够以额外的计算量换取更好的解决方案,我们引入了一种波束搜索近似方法,对贪婪搜索进行了概括,并对获得的解决方案提供了近似保证。最后,我们进行了大量实验,结果表明(1) 我们灵活的双标准框架允许我们获得更高质量的解决方案,同时仍然保持高度的多样性;(2) 我们的波束搜索近似方法比贪婪搜索的性能有显著提高,对于大量实例,它能够生成与精确 MIP 求解器相同或更好的解决方案,但运行时间限制明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信