Avoiding Node Re-Expansions Can Break Symmetry Breaking

Mark Carlson, Daniel D. Harabor, P. Stuckey
{"title":"Avoiding Node Re-Expansions Can Break Symmetry Breaking","authors":"Mark Carlson, Daniel D. Harabor, P. Stuckey","doi":"10.1609/socs.v17i1.31538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Symmetry breaking and weighted-suboptimal search are two popular speed up techniques used in pathfinding search.\nIt is a commonly held assumption that they are orthogonal and easily combined.\nIn this paper we illustrate that this is not necessarily the case when combining a number of symmetry breaking methods, based on Jump Point Search, with Weighted A*, a bounded suboptimal search approach which does not require node re-expansions.\nSurprisingly, the combination of these two methods can cause search to fail, finding no path to a target node when clearly such paths exist.\nWe demonstrate this phenomena and show how we can modify the combination to always succeed with low overhead.","PeriodicalId":425645,"journal":{"name":"Symposium on Combinatorial Search","volume":"57 4","pages":"20-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium on Combinatorial Search","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/socs.v17i1.31538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Symmetry breaking and weighted-suboptimal search are two popular speed up techniques used in pathfinding search. It is a commonly held assumption that they are orthogonal and easily combined. In this paper we illustrate that this is not necessarily the case when combining a number of symmetry breaking methods, based on Jump Point Search, with Weighted A*, a bounded suboptimal search approach which does not require node re-expansions. Surprisingly, the combination of these two methods can cause search to fail, finding no path to a target node when clearly such paths exist. We demonstrate this phenomena and show how we can modify the combination to always succeed with low overhead.
避免节点重新扩展可打破对称性破坏
对称性破缺和加权次优搜索是寻路搜索中常用的两种加速技术。通常认为这两种技术是正交的,很容易结合在一起。在本文中,我们将基于跳跃点搜索的对称性破缺方法与加权A*(一种不需要节点重新展开的有界次优搜索方法)结合在一起,说明情况并不一定如此。令人惊讶的是,这两种方法的结合可能会导致搜索失败,在明显存在通往目标节点的路径时却找不到路径。我们演示了这一现象,并展示了如何修改这种结合,使其始终以较低的开销取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信