Insights into MLH1 Methylation in Endometrial Adenocarcinoma through Pyrosequencing Analysis: A Retrospective Observational Study

Cancers Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.3390/cancers16112119
F. F. E. Silva, A. Ballini, V. Caponio, Mário Pérez-Sayáns, Marina Gándara Cortés, Laura Isabel Rojo-Álvarez, Abel García-García, J. Suárez-Peñaranda, M. Di Domenico, M. Padín-Iruegas
{"title":"Insights into MLH1 Methylation in Endometrial Adenocarcinoma through Pyrosequencing Analysis: A Retrospective Observational Study","authors":"F. F. E. Silva, A. Ballini, V. Caponio, Mário Pérez-Sayáns, Marina Gándara Cortés, Laura Isabel Rojo-Álvarez, Abel García-García, J. Suárez-Peñaranda, M. Di Domenico, M. Padín-Iruegas","doi":"10.3390/cancers16112119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In cancer care, the MLH1 gene is crucial for DNA mismatch repair (MMR), serving as a vital tumor suppressor. Evaluating MLH1 protein expression status, followed by analysis of MLH1 promoter methylation, has become a key diagnostic and prognostic approach. Our study investigates the complex link between MLH1 methylation and prognosis in endometrial adenocarcinoma (EA) patients. Methodology: MLH1 methylation status was accessed by a Pyrosequencing (PSQ) assay. Qualitative positivity for methylation was established if it exceeded the 11% cut-off; as well, a quantitative methylation analysis was conducted to establish correlations with clinicopathological data, relapse-free survival, and disease-free survival. Results: Our study revealed that 33.3% of patients without MLH1 methylation experienced relapses, surpassing the 23.3% in patients with methylation. Furthermore, 16.7% of patients without methylation succumbed to death, with a slightly higher rate of 17.6% in methylated patients. Qualitative comparisons highlighted that the mean methylation rate in patients experiencing relapse was 35.8%, whereas in those without relapse, it was 42.2%. This pattern persisted in disease-specific survival (DSS), where deceased patients exhibited a higher mean methylation level of 49.1% compared to living patients with 38.8%. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the efficacy of PSQ for evaluating MLH1 methylation. While unmethylation appears to be associated with a higher relapse rate, the survival rate does not seem to be influenced by methylation. Quantitative percentages suggest that elevated MLH1 methylation is linked to relapse and mortality, though a study with a larger sample size would be essential for statistically significant results.","PeriodicalId":504676,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"42 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16112119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In cancer care, the MLH1 gene is crucial for DNA mismatch repair (MMR), serving as a vital tumor suppressor. Evaluating MLH1 protein expression status, followed by analysis of MLH1 promoter methylation, has become a key diagnostic and prognostic approach. Our study investigates the complex link between MLH1 methylation and prognosis in endometrial adenocarcinoma (EA) patients. Methodology: MLH1 methylation status was accessed by a Pyrosequencing (PSQ) assay. Qualitative positivity for methylation was established if it exceeded the 11% cut-off; as well, a quantitative methylation analysis was conducted to establish correlations with clinicopathological data, relapse-free survival, and disease-free survival. Results: Our study revealed that 33.3% of patients without MLH1 methylation experienced relapses, surpassing the 23.3% in patients with methylation. Furthermore, 16.7% of patients without methylation succumbed to death, with a slightly higher rate of 17.6% in methylated patients. Qualitative comparisons highlighted that the mean methylation rate in patients experiencing relapse was 35.8%, whereas in those without relapse, it was 42.2%. This pattern persisted in disease-specific survival (DSS), where deceased patients exhibited a higher mean methylation level of 49.1% compared to living patients with 38.8%. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the efficacy of PSQ for evaluating MLH1 methylation. While unmethylation appears to be associated with a higher relapse rate, the survival rate does not seem to be influenced by methylation. Quantitative percentages suggest that elevated MLH1 methylation is linked to relapse and mortality, though a study with a larger sample size would be essential for statistically significant results.
通过热测序分析了解子宫内膜腺癌中的 MLH1 甲基化:一项回顾性观察研究
背景:在癌症治疗中,MLH1 基因对 DNA 错配修复(MMR)至关重要,是重要的肿瘤抑制因子。评估 MLH1 蛋白表达状态,然后分析 MLH1 启动子甲基化,已成为一种重要的诊断和预后方法。我们的研究探讨了子宫内膜腺癌(EA)患者 MLH1 甲基化与预后之间的复杂联系。研究方法通过热测序(PSQ)检测法了解 MLH1 甲基化状态。如果甲基化程度超过 11% 的临界值,则确定为定性阳性;此外,还进行了甲基化定量分析,以确定与临床病理数据、无复发生存率和无病生存率之间的相关性。结果我们的研究发现,33.3%的无 MLH1 甲基化的患者复发,超过了 23.3%的有甲基化的患者。此外,16.7%的未甲基化患者死亡,而甲基化患者的死亡比例略高,为17.6%。定性比较显示,复发患者的平均甲基化率为 35.8%,而未复发患者的平均甲基化率为 42.2%。这种模式在疾病特异性生存率(DSS)中依然存在,死亡患者的平均甲基化水平为 49.1%,高于在世患者的 38.8%。结论我们的研究结果强调了 PSQ 在评估 MLH1 甲基化方面的有效性。虽然未甲基化似乎与较高的复发率有关,但生存率似乎不受甲基化的影响。定量百分比表明,MLH1甲基化升高与复发和死亡率有关,但要获得有统计学意义的结果,必须进行样本量更大的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信