Occupational Health Hazards among Workers in Chemical Factories

Nadia Bandery Elsayed, Hala Mohamed Mohamed, Safinaz Mohamed Sayed
{"title":"Occupational Health Hazards among Workers in Chemical Factories","authors":"Nadia Bandery Elsayed, Hala Mohamed Mohamed, Safinaz Mohamed Sayed","doi":"10.21608/ejhc.2024.357829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Occupational health hazards are risks associated with working in specific occupations. Types of occupational health hazards are chemical, biological, physical, and psychological hazards. Aim: Assessing occupational health hazards among workers in chemical factories. Design: A descriptive exploratory study design was used. Setting: The study was conducted at industry area at EL Sharqia governorate, Egypt. Five factories, where selected which contain the largest number of workers. Sample: All available workers in five factories were 200. Tools: two tools were used; first tool an interviewing questionnaire consisted of four parts to assess worker's demographic data, medical history, exposure to various types of occupational health hazards, and level of knowledge. Second tool observational checklist consists of three parts to assess worker’s compliance related to safety measures and work environment. Results: The study finding revealed that, 73.5% of workers were male and mean of workers age was 36.42±5.2 as regard, 53.0% of workers were married, and 57.0% of workers were secondary education, 62.0% of workers had a family members more than five individuals, 76.5% of workers have not sufficient income, the mean of worker's no of years of factory work was 7.06±3.55, 94.0% of workers worked at day shifts, 52.0% of workers worked from 6-8 hours. Additionally, there was a highly statistically significant relation between worker’s knowledge and exposure to occupational hazard. Conclusion: The study concluded that 86.5% of workers expose to physical hazards, 95% of workers expose to chemical hazards, 4% of workers expose to biological hazards, and 82% of workers expose to psychological hazards, more than two thirds of studied workers had unsatisfactory level of knowledge regarding occupational safety and health hazards, and statistically significant correlated between exposure to occupational hazard and environment when p-value was <0.001*. Recommendations: Provide educational program to workers about different type of occupational hazard and importance of safety measures.","PeriodicalId":505881,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Health Care","volume":"36 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhc.2024.357829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Occupational health hazards are risks associated with working in specific occupations. Types of occupational health hazards are chemical, biological, physical, and psychological hazards. Aim: Assessing occupational health hazards among workers in chemical factories. Design: A descriptive exploratory study design was used. Setting: The study was conducted at industry area at EL Sharqia governorate, Egypt. Five factories, where selected which contain the largest number of workers. Sample: All available workers in five factories were 200. Tools: two tools were used; first tool an interviewing questionnaire consisted of four parts to assess worker's demographic data, medical history, exposure to various types of occupational health hazards, and level of knowledge. Second tool observational checklist consists of three parts to assess worker’s compliance related to safety measures and work environment. Results: The study finding revealed that, 73.5% of workers were male and mean of workers age was 36.42±5.2 as regard, 53.0% of workers were married, and 57.0% of workers were secondary education, 62.0% of workers had a family members more than five individuals, 76.5% of workers have not sufficient income, the mean of worker's no of years of factory work was 7.06±3.55, 94.0% of workers worked at day shifts, 52.0% of workers worked from 6-8 hours. Additionally, there was a highly statistically significant relation between worker’s knowledge and exposure to occupational hazard. Conclusion: The study concluded that 86.5% of workers expose to physical hazards, 95% of workers expose to chemical hazards, 4% of workers expose to biological hazards, and 82% of workers expose to psychological hazards, more than two thirds of studied workers had unsatisfactory level of knowledge regarding occupational safety and health hazards, and statistically significant correlated between exposure to occupational hazard and environment when p-value was <0.001*. Recommendations: Provide educational program to workers about different type of occupational hazard and importance of safety measures.
化工厂工人的职业健康危害
背景:职业健康危害是与从事特定职业相关的风险。职业健康危害的类型包括化学危害、生物危害、物理危害和心理危害。目的:评估化工厂工人的职业健康危害。设计:采用描述性探索研究设计。研究地点研究在埃及 EL Sharqia 省的工业区进行。选取了工人人数最多的五家工厂。样本:五家工厂的所有工人共 200 人。工具:使用了两种工具;第一种工具是由四个部分组成的访谈问卷,用于评估工人的人口统计学数据、病史、接触各种职业健康危害的情况以及知识水平。第二种工具是观察核对表,由三部分组成,用于评估工人对安全措施和工作环境的遵守情况。结果研究结果显示,73.5%的工人为男性,平均年龄为(36.42±5.2)岁,53.0%的工人已婚,57.0%的工人受过中等教育,62.0%的工人家庭成员超过 5 人,76.5%的工人收入不足,工人的平均工厂工作年限为(7.06±3.55)年,94.0%的工人上白班,52.0%的工人工作时间为 6-8 小时。此外,工人的知识水平与职业危害暴露之间的关系具有高度统计学意义。结论研究得出的结论是,86.5% 的工人接触物理危害,95% 的工人接触化学危害,4% 的工人接触生物危害,82% 的工人接触心理危害,超过三分之二的被调查工人对职业安全与健康危害的了解程度不尽人意,当 P 值小于 0.001* 时,职业危害接触与环境之间存在统计学意义上的显著相关性。建议为工人提供有关不同类型职业危害和安全措施重要性的教育计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信