Pengaruh Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas IV SDN 11 Pontianak Kota

Nur Amaliawan, Kartono Kartono, Dyoty Auliya Vilda Ghasya
{"title":"Pengaruh Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas IV SDN 11 Pontianak Kota","authors":"Nur Amaliawan, Kartono Kartono, Dyoty Auliya Vilda Ghasya","doi":"10.36088/fondatia.v8i2.4797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach is an approach developed by the Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University in the Netherlands. This research focuses on the learning outcomes of fourth grade students of SDN 11 Pontianak Kota which aims to answer three questions: (1) Student learning outcomes using the RME approach, (2) Student learning outcomes without using the RME approach, and (3) The average difference in student learning outcomes. The research method used quantitative research of quasi-experimental type with Nonequivalent control group design and data collection techniques through measurement techniques with instruments in the form of essay questions. The results of the research findings (1) Student learning outcomes using the RME approach were obtained at the pre-test value with an average of 11.76 and at the post-test value with an average of 73.80, (2) Student learning outcomes without using the RME approach were obtained at the pre-test value with an average of 14.12 and at the post-test value with an average of 50.40, and (3) Based on calculations using the N-Gain formula, the average learning outcomes were 70.87 and 42.39. So it is concluded that the class using the Realistic Mathematics Eduation (RME) approach is better than the class without the Realistic Mathematics Eduation (RME) approach.","PeriodicalId":517932,"journal":{"name":"FONDATIA","volume":"34 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FONDATIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v8i2.4797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach is an approach developed by the Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University in the Netherlands. This research focuses on the learning outcomes of fourth grade students of SDN 11 Pontianak Kota which aims to answer three questions: (1) Student learning outcomes using the RME approach, (2) Student learning outcomes without using the RME approach, and (3) The average difference in student learning outcomes. The research method used quantitative research of quasi-experimental type with Nonequivalent control group design and data collection techniques through measurement techniques with instruments in the form of essay questions. The results of the research findings (1) Student learning outcomes using the RME approach were obtained at the pre-test value with an average of 11.76 and at the post-test value with an average of 73.80, (2) Student learning outcomes without using the RME approach were obtained at the pre-test value with an average of 14.12 and at the post-test value with an average of 50.40, and (3) Based on calculations using the N-Gain formula, the average learning outcomes were 70.87 and 42.39. So it is concluded that the class using the Realistic Mathematics Eduation (RME) approach is better than the class without the Realistic Mathematics Eduation (RME) approach.
现实数学教育法对 SDN 11 Pontianak Kota 四年级学生学习成果的影响
现实数学教育(RME)方法是荷兰乌得勒支大学弗赖登塔尔研究所(Freudenthal Institute)开发的一种方法。本研究的重点是坤甸科塔 SDN 11 学校四年级学生的学习成果,旨在回答三个问题:(1) 使用现实数学教育法的学生学习成果;(2) 不使用现实数学教育法的学生学习成果;(3) 学生学习成果的平均差异。研究方法采用了非等效对照组设计的准实验型定量研究,并通过以论文问题为工具的测量技术收集数据。研究结果表明:(1) 采用 RME 方法的学生学习成果在测试前平均为 11.76,在测试后平均为 73.80;(2) 未采用 RME 方法的学生学习成果在测试前平均为 14.12,在测试后平均为 50.40;(3) 根据 N 增益公式计算,平均学习成果分别为 70.87 和 42.39。因此,可以得出结论,使用现实数学教育法的班级比没有使用现实数学教育法的班级要好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信