The expansion of basic education during ‘deskilling’ technological change in England and Wales, c. 1780–1830

Louis Henderson
{"title":"The expansion of basic education during ‘deskilling’ technological change in England and Wales, c. 1780–1830","authors":"Louis Henderson","doi":"10.1111/ehr.13354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first country to industrialize – England – ostensibly did so without expanding investment in the basic education of its workforce. The empirical evidence underpinning this argument for England rests largely on signature rates at marriage. These are not a perfect indication of educational achievement, particularly as many children never learned to write. More problematically, I argue signatures are likely to have systematically underestimated human capital in industrial districts. In place of signature data, I propose age heaping, a measure widely understood as a proxy for numeracy but shown here to be closely related to both reading and writing abilities. In contrast to signatures, this measure suggests that ‘deskilling’ industrialization induced human capital accumulation. I argue that this occurred not because human capital was directly productive, but rather because schools provided a valuable signal. Sunday school attendance signalled low leisure‐preference among child workers and were popularly attended in industrial districts. Further, such schools taught children to read but not write, which they considered inappropriate for the Sabbath, accounting for the discrepancy between these two measures of human capital.","PeriodicalId":505850,"journal":{"name":"The Economic History Review","volume":"43 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Economic History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The first country to industrialize – England – ostensibly did so without expanding investment in the basic education of its workforce. The empirical evidence underpinning this argument for England rests largely on signature rates at marriage. These are not a perfect indication of educational achievement, particularly as many children never learned to write. More problematically, I argue signatures are likely to have systematically underestimated human capital in industrial districts. In place of signature data, I propose age heaping, a measure widely understood as a proxy for numeracy but shown here to be closely related to both reading and writing abilities. In contrast to signatures, this measure suggests that ‘deskilling’ industrialization induced human capital accumulation. I argue that this occurred not because human capital was directly productive, but rather because schools provided a valuable signal. Sunday school attendance signalled low leisure‐preference among child workers and were popularly attended in industrial districts. Further, such schools taught children to read but not write, which they considered inappropriate for the Sabbath, accounting for the discrepancy between these two measures of human capital.
约 1780-1830 年英格兰和威尔士 "桌面化 "技术变革期间基础教育的扩展
第一个实现工业化的国家--英国--表面上是在没有扩大对劳动力基础教育投资的情况下实现工业化的。支撑英国这一论点的经验证据主要是结婚时的签字率。这并不能完美地反映教育成就,尤其是许多孩子从未学过写字。更有问题的是,我认为签名很可能系统性地低估了工业区的人力资本。为了取代签名数据,我提出了 "年龄堆积 "的方法,这一方法被广泛理解为计算能力的替代方法,但在本文中却被证明与阅读和写作能力密切相关。与签名数据不同的是,这一指标表明,"桌面化 "工业化促进了人力资本的积累。我认为,出现这种情况并不是因为人力资本直接具有生产力,而是因为学校提供了有价值的信号。参加主日学校意味着童工的休闲偏好较低,在工业区很受欢迎。此外,这些学校教孩子们阅读,但不教他们写字,他们认为这不适合在安息日进行,这也是这两种人力资本衡量标准之间存在差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信