A LITERATURE REVIEW ON ASSESSMENT TOOLS USED TO EVALUATE BALANCE AMONG AUTISTIC CHILDREN

Prasanth Kumar. K, Dr.Alice Jebba, Dr C.N Prabushanker
{"title":"A LITERATURE REVIEW ON ASSESSMENT TOOLS USED TO EVALUATE BALANCE AMONG AUTISTIC CHILDREN","authors":"Prasanth Kumar. K, Dr.Alice Jebba, Dr C.N Prabushanker","doi":"10.36713/epra17181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: ASD is a neurological developmental disorder that is typically characterized by repetitive or stereotyped behavior, social and communication difficulties, and balance issues. However, there is a close relationship between ASD, gross motor skills, and sensory-motor integration. \n Objective: The main objective of this literature review is, to analyze and to provide the overview of the available balance evaluation tools for autistic children which were widely in use from last 5-7 years.\nMethod: In this review of literature, the selection of the articles is sourced from various reputable platforms including Google scholar , science direct , and Pubmed. These articles are from the years 2016 to 2024.\nResults: It is challenging to choose one acceptable balance assessment approach because of the availability of numerous methods , different studies have determined how to evaluate balance based on different goals, and no one measure has emerged. In this study we addressed a few specific evaluation tools that help to identify balance issues especially for ASD children. A simple following criteria is applied for the selection of the evaluation of tools: 1) Commonly used in practice (ii) evaluation of static balance and dynamic balance and (iii) it has to be suitable for autism children. They include the Pediatric balance scale, the Bruininks-Oseretsky motor proficiency test -2, and Movement assessment battery for children.\nConclusion: In conclusion, the study outlines the three assessment tools that are being widely in use , in the clinical field to evaluate the balance among children with ASD. This review examines and contrasts the limitations and strengths of these different tools useful for assessing dynamic balance and static balance. However, to determine the potential implications of these tools for evaluating balance in individuals with ASD further, it is essential to conduct more meticulously designed randomized controlled trials.","PeriodicalId":114964,"journal":{"name":"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPRA International Journal of Research & Development (IJRD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36713/epra17181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: ASD is a neurological developmental disorder that is typically characterized by repetitive or stereotyped behavior, social and communication difficulties, and balance issues. However, there is a close relationship between ASD, gross motor skills, and sensory-motor integration. Objective: The main objective of this literature review is, to analyze and to provide the overview of the available balance evaluation tools for autistic children which were widely in use from last 5-7 years. Method: In this review of literature, the selection of the articles is sourced from various reputable platforms including Google scholar , science direct , and Pubmed. These articles are from the years 2016 to 2024. Results: It is challenging to choose one acceptable balance assessment approach because of the availability of numerous methods , different studies have determined how to evaluate balance based on different goals, and no one measure has emerged. In this study we addressed a few specific evaluation tools that help to identify balance issues especially for ASD children. A simple following criteria is applied for the selection of the evaluation of tools: 1) Commonly used in practice (ii) evaluation of static balance and dynamic balance and (iii) it has to be suitable for autism children. They include the Pediatric balance scale, the Bruininks-Oseretsky motor proficiency test -2, and Movement assessment battery for children. Conclusion: In conclusion, the study outlines the three assessment tools that are being widely in use , in the clinical field to evaluate the balance among children with ASD. This review examines and contrasts the limitations and strengths of these different tools useful for assessing dynamic balance and static balance. However, to determine the potential implications of these tools for evaluating balance in individuals with ASD further, it is essential to conduct more meticulously designed randomized controlled trials.
自闭症儿童平衡能力评估工具文献综述
背景:自闭症是一种神经系统发育障碍,其典型特征是行为重复或刻板、社交和沟通困难以及平衡问题。然而,ASD、粗大运动技能和感觉运动整合之间存在密切关系。 目的:本文献综述的主要目的是分析和概述过去 5-7 年间广泛使用的自闭症儿童平衡评估工具:在本次文献综述中,我们从谷歌学术、科学直通车和Pubmed等多个知名平台上选取了部分文章。这些文章的时间跨度为 2016 年至 2024 年:要选择一种可接受的平衡评估方法具有挑战性,因为有许多方法可供选择,不同的研究根据不同的目标确定了如何评估平衡,而且还没有出现一种衡量标准。在本研究中,我们探讨了几种有助于识别平衡问题(尤其是 ASD 儿童的平衡问题)的特定评估工具。在选择评估工具时,我们采用了以下简单的标准:1)在实践中普遍使用;(2)评估静态平衡和动态平衡;(3)必须适合自闭症儿童。这些工具包括小儿平衡量表、布鲁宁克斯-奥塞瑞斯基运动能力测试-2 和儿童运动评估电池:总之,本研究概述了临床上广泛使用的三种评估工具,用于评估自闭症儿童的平衡能力。本综述研究并对比了这些不同工具在评估动态平衡和静态平衡方面的局限性和优势。然而,要进一步确定这些工具对评估 ASD 患者平衡能力的潜在影响,就必须进行更多精心设计的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信