Safety and Efficacy of Bone Marrow and Adipose Tissue Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury: A Preliminary Study

Q4 Medicine
Fatima Jamali, Mahmoud Quda, Said Dahbour, D. Alhattab, Hisham Bawa'neh, Reem Rahmeh, Osama Samara, Abdalla Awidi
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Bone Marrow and Adipose Tissue Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury: A Preliminary Study","authors":"Fatima Jamali, Mahmoud Quda, Said Dahbour, D. Alhattab, Hisham Bawa'neh, Reem Rahmeh, Osama Samara, Abdalla Awidi","doi":"10.35516/jmj.v58i2.523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) of various origins are the most widely investigated type of stem cells in clinical trials. We report a treatment comparison of two adult sources of autologous MSCs regarding safety and efficacy in established spinal cord injury (SCI).Materials and Methods: In this Phase I/II open-label two-arm study, patients were divided into two groups. The first group was treated with autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSC), while the second was treated with autologous adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AT-MSC). Safety and outcomes were assessed in both groups for 24 months post-treatment initiation using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS).Results: Both groups showed no serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). AIS-assessed outcomes pointed to sensory and motor improvements in patients of both groups. Patients who received AT-MSCs showed better sensory and motor function improvement than those who received BM-MSCs. One patient in the AT-MSCs group regained the ability to walk after years of disability.Conclusions: Intrathecal injection of autologous AT-MSCs and autologous BM-MSC appears to be safe, with a possible advantage in the AT-MSCs treatment option regarding efficacy over BM-MSCs. Future clinical trials investigating larger sample sizes are warranted for wider use of this treatment modality in clinical practice. Furthermore, earlier use of cellular therapy intervention for SCI patients is predicted to improve the benefits.Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02981576","PeriodicalId":39681,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Medical Journal","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v58i2.523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) of various origins are the most widely investigated type of stem cells in clinical trials. We report a treatment comparison of two adult sources of autologous MSCs regarding safety and efficacy in established spinal cord injury (SCI).Materials and Methods: In this Phase I/II open-label two-arm study, patients were divided into two groups. The first group was treated with autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSC), while the second was treated with autologous adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AT-MSC). Safety and outcomes were assessed in both groups for 24 months post-treatment initiation using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS).Results: Both groups showed no serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). AIS-assessed outcomes pointed to sensory and motor improvements in patients of both groups. Patients who received AT-MSCs showed better sensory and motor function improvement than those who received BM-MSCs. One patient in the AT-MSCs group regained the ability to walk after years of disability.Conclusions: Intrathecal injection of autologous AT-MSCs and autologous BM-MSC appears to be safe, with a possible advantage in the AT-MSCs treatment option regarding efficacy over BM-MSCs. Future clinical trials investigating larger sample sizes are warranted for wider use of this treatment modality in clinical practice. Furthermore, earlier use of cellular therapy intervention for SCI patients is predicted to improve the benefits.Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02981576
骨髓和脂肪组织间充质干细胞治疗脊髓损伤的安全性和有效性:初步研究
背景:各种来源的间充质干细胞(MSC)是临床试验中研究最广泛的干细胞类型。我们报告了两种成人来源的自体间充质干细胞对脊髓损伤(SCI)的安全性和有效性的治疗比较:在这项 I/II 期开放标签双臂研究中,患者被分为两组。第一组接受自体骨髓间充质干细胞(BM-MSC)治疗,第二组接受自体脂肪组织间充质干细胞(AT-MSC)治疗。采用美国脊柱损伤协会(ASIA)损伤量表(AIS)对两组患者治疗后24个月的安全性和疗效进行了评估:结果:两组患者均未出现严重的治疗突发不良事件(TEAEs)。AIS评估结果显示,两组患者的感觉和运动能力均有所改善。与接受BM-间充质干细胞治疗的患者相比,接受AT-间充质干细胞治疗的患者在感觉和运动功能方面有更好的改善。AT-间充质干细胞组的一名患者在残疾多年后恢复了行走能力:结论:鞘内注射自体AT-间充质干细胞和自体BM-间充质干细胞似乎是安全的,AT-间充质干细胞治疗方案的疗效可能优于BM-间充质干细胞。为了在临床实践中更广泛地使用这种治疗方式,今后有必要开展样本量更大的临床试验。此外,对 SCI 患者更早地使用细胞疗法干预有望提高疗效:NCT02981576
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jordan Medical Journal
Jordan Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信