Comparison of regional vs. general anesthesia on the risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

I. Chen, Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Jen-Yin Chen, Hsiao-Tien Chen, Kuo-Mao Lan, K-C Hung, Ching-Chung Ko
{"title":"Comparison of regional vs. general anesthesia on the risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"I. Chen, Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Jen-Yin Chen, Hsiao-Tien Chen, Kuo-Mao Lan, K-C Hung, Ching-Chung Ko","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1362461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dementia is a gradual and ongoing cognitive decline due to damage to nerve cells in the brain. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the potential relationship between regional anesthesia (RA) and the risk of dementia.Electronic databases including Embase, Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies investigating the association between RA and dementia risk from inception to March 2022. The primary outcome was the risk of dementia in patients who underwent RA (RA group) and those who received general anesthesia (GA group). Secondary outcomes included identifying other potential risk factors for dementia and comparing dementia risk between individuals receiving RA and those not receiving surgery/anesthesia (placebo group).Eight cohort studies published between 2014 and 2023 were included in this analysis. A meta-analysis of the available data demonstrated no differences in baseline characteristics and morbidities (i.e., age, male proportion, hypertension, diabetes, depression, and severe comorbidities) between the RA and GA groups (all p > 0.05). Initial analysis revealed that the risk of dementia was higher in the GA group than in the RA group (HR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.29–2.55, p = 0.007, I2 = 99%, five studies). However, when a study featuring a relatively younger population was excluded from the sensitivity analysis, the results showed a similar risk of dementia (HR, 1.17; p = 0.13) between the GA and RA groups. The pooled results revealed no difference in dementia risk between the RA and placebo groups (HR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.69–2.07, p = 0.52, I2 = 68%, three studies). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the evidence was not stable, suggesting that limited datasets precluded strong conclusions on this outcome. Anxiety, stroke history, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes are potential predictors of dementia.Our results emphasize that, while RA could be protective against dementia risk compared to GA, the association between the type of anesthesia and dementia risk might vary among different age groups. Owing to the significant prevalence of dementia among older people and their surgical needs, further investigations are warranted to clarify the association between dementia risk and regional anesthesia.Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42023411324.","PeriodicalId":510753,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"30 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1362461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dementia is a gradual and ongoing cognitive decline due to damage to nerve cells in the brain. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the potential relationship between regional anesthesia (RA) and the risk of dementia.Electronic databases including Embase, Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies investigating the association between RA and dementia risk from inception to March 2022. The primary outcome was the risk of dementia in patients who underwent RA (RA group) and those who received general anesthesia (GA group). Secondary outcomes included identifying other potential risk factors for dementia and comparing dementia risk between individuals receiving RA and those not receiving surgery/anesthesia (placebo group).Eight cohort studies published between 2014 and 2023 were included in this analysis. A meta-analysis of the available data demonstrated no differences in baseline characteristics and morbidities (i.e., age, male proportion, hypertension, diabetes, depression, and severe comorbidities) between the RA and GA groups (all p > 0.05). Initial analysis revealed that the risk of dementia was higher in the GA group than in the RA group (HR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.29–2.55, p = 0.007, I2 = 99%, five studies). However, when a study featuring a relatively younger population was excluded from the sensitivity analysis, the results showed a similar risk of dementia (HR, 1.17; p = 0.13) between the GA and RA groups. The pooled results revealed no difference in dementia risk between the RA and placebo groups (HR = 1.2, 95% CI = 0.69–2.07, p = 0.52, I2 = 68%, three studies). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the evidence was not stable, suggesting that limited datasets precluded strong conclusions on this outcome. Anxiety, stroke history, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes are potential predictors of dementia.Our results emphasize that, while RA could be protective against dementia risk compared to GA, the association between the type of anesthesia and dementia risk might vary among different age groups. Owing to the significant prevalence of dementia among older people and their surgical needs, further investigations are warranted to clarify the association between dementia risk and regional anesthesia.Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42023411324.
区域麻醉与全身麻醉对痴呆症风险的影响比较:系统回顾与荟萃分析
痴呆症是一种由于大脑神经细胞受损而导致的渐进性、持续性认知能力下降。这项荟萃分析旨在评估区域麻醉(RA)与痴呆症风险之间的潜在关系。研究人员在Embase、Medline、Google Scholar和Cochrane Library等电子数据库中搜索了从开始到2022年3月期间调查RA与痴呆症风险之间关系的研究。主要结果是接受RA(RA组)和全身麻醉(GA组)患者的痴呆风险。次要结果包括确定痴呆症的其他潜在风险因素,并比较接受RA和未接受手术/麻醉的患者(安慰剂组)的痴呆症风险。对现有数据进行的荟萃分析表明,RA组和GA组在基线特征和发病率(即年龄、男性比例、高血压、糖尿病、抑郁症和严重合并症)方面没有差异(所有P>0.05)。初步分析显示,GA 组的痴呆风险高于 RA 组(HR = 1.81,95% CI = 1.29-2.55,P = 0.007,I2 = 99%,5 项研究)。然而,当敏感性分析中排除了一项以相对年轻的人群为特征的研究时,结果显示GA组和RA组的痴呆风险相似(HR,1.17;P = 0.13)。汇总结果显示,RA组和安慰剂组的痴呆风险没有差异(HR = 1.2,95% CI = 0.69-2.07,p = 0.52,I2 = 68%,三项研究)。敏感性分析表明,证据并不稳定,表明有限的数据集无法对此结果得出有力的结论。焦虑、中风史、高血压、糖尿病、高脂血症和糖尿病是痴呆症的潜在预测因素。我们的研究结果强调,与 GA 相比,RA 可保护痴呆症风险,但麻醉类型与痴呆症风险之间的关联在不同年龄组中可能有所不同。由于痴呆症在老年人中的发病率很高,而且他们需要进行手术,因此有必要进行进一步调查,以明确痴呆症风险与区域麻醉之间的关系。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/,CRD42023411324。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信