Endoscopic Evacuation of Acute Subdural Hematomas: A New Selection Criterion

J. E. Sam, Fuminari Komatsu, Yasuhiro Yamada, Riki Tanaka, Kento Sasaki, Takamitsu Tamura, Yoko Kato
{"title":"Endoscopic Evacuation of Acute Subdural Hematomas: A New Selection Criterion","authors":"J. E. Sam, Fuminari Komatsu, Yasuhiro Yamada, Riki Tanaka, Kento Sasaki, Takamitsu Tamura, Yoko Kato","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Introduction Acute subdural hematomas (ASDHs) have a high mortality rate and unfavorable outcomes especially in the elderly population even after surgery is performed. The conventional recommended surgeries by the Brain Trauma Foundation in 2006 were craniotomies or craniectomies for ASDH. As the world population ages, and endoscopic techniques improve, endoscopic surgery should be utilized to improve the outcomes in elderly patients with ASDH.\n Materials and Methods This was a single-center retrospective report on our series of six patients that underwent endoscopic ASDH evacuation (EASE). Demographic data, the contralateral global cortical atrophy (GCA) score, evacuation rates, and outcomes were analyzed.\n Results All patients' symptoms and Glasgow Coma Scale improved or were similar after EASE with no complications. Good outcome was seen in 4 (66.7%) patients. Patients with poor outcome had initial low Glasgow Coma Scale scores on admission. The higher the contralateral GCA score, the higher the evacuation rate (r = 0.825, p ≤ 0.043). All the patients had a GCA score of ≥7.\n Conclusion EASE is at least not inferior to craniotomy for the elderly population in terms of functional outcome for now. Using the contralateral GCA score may help identify suitable patients for this technique instead of just using a cut-off age as a criteria.","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Acute subdural hematomas (ASDHs) have a high mortality rate and unfavorable outcomes especially in the elderly population even after surgery is performed. The conventional recommended surgeries by the Brain Trauma Foundation in 2006 were craniotomies or craniectomies for ASDH. As the world population ages, and endoscopic techniques improve, endoscopic surgery should be utilized to improve the outcomes in elderly patients with ASDH. Materials and Methods This was a single-center retrospective report on our series of six patients that underwent endoscopic ASDH evacuation (EASE). Demographic data, the contralateral global cortical atrophy (GCA) score, evacuation rates, and outcomes were analyzed. Results All patients' symptoms and Glasgow Coma Scale improved or were similar after EASE with no complications. Good outcome was seen in 4 (66.7%) patients. Patients with poor outcome had initial low Glasgow Coma Scale scores on admission. The higher the contralateral GCA score, the higher the evacuation rate (r = 0.825, p ≤ 0.043). All the patients had a GCA score of ≥7. Conclusion EASE is at least not inferior to craniotomy for the elderly population in terms of functional outcome for now. Using the contralateral GCA score may help identify suitable patients for this technique instead of just using a cut-off age as a criteria.
急性硬膜下血肿的内窥镜清除术:新的选择标准
导言:急性硬膜下血肿(ASDH)的死亡率很高,尤其是在老年人群中,即使进行了手术,也很难治愈。2006 年,脑外伤基金会推荐的急性硬膜下血肿传统手术方式是开颅或开颅切除术。随着世界人口的老龄化和内窥镜技术的进步,应利用内窥镜手术改善老年 ASDH 患者的治疗效果。材料与方法 这是一份单中心的回顾性报告,介绍了我们为六名患者实施的内镜下 ASDH 抽离术(EASE)。分析了人口统计学数据、对侧大脑皮质萎缩(GCA)评分、撤离率和结果。结果 EASE术后,所有患者的症状和格拉斯哥昏迷量表均有所改善或相似,且无并发症。4例(66.7%)患者的预后良好。疗效不佳的患者入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分较低。对侧 GCA 评分越高,撤离率越高(r = 0.825,p ≤ 0.043)。所有患者的 GCA 评分均≥7 分。结论 对老年人群而言,EASE 在功能预后方面至少目前并不逊色于开颅手术。使用对侧 GCA 评分可能有助于鉴别适合采用这种技术的患者,而不是仅仅以年龄为标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信