Experience of rigorous practice of antimicrobial stewardship program and its impact on antibiotic consumption

Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.25259/jlp_17_2024
Shweta Kumar, S. Khadanga, Rehan Ul Haq, Pradeep Saxena, Ananyan Sampath, Karuna Tadepalli
{"title":"Experience of rigorous practice of antimicrobial stewardship program and its impact on antibiotic consumption","authors":"Shweta Kumar, S. Khadanga, Rehan Ul Haq, Pradeep Saxena, Ananyan Sampath, Karuna Tadepalli","doi":"10.25259/jlp_17_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is the next pandemic with a huge global economic burden. A customized antimicrobial stewardship program (AMSP) is a well-recognized tool for containment of AMR. The current study was undertaken to identify the impact of AMSP measures on the trends of antibiotic consumption rates, e.g., defined daily dose (DDD) and days of therapy (DOT) per 100 patient days in pre-identified areas of the hospital.\n\n\n\nThe present study was a case-record-based extended cross-sectional study carried out in a tertiary care institute in central India from January 2021 to September 2021. Time-bound feasible sampling was undertaken, and all cases were included without any exclusion criteria. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute and funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR).\n\n\n\nThe data was entered into a spreadsheet. The calculation of DDD and DOT was performed individually for each antibiotic as per WHO tool per 100 patient days.\n\n\n\nIn high-priority areas such as intensive care unit and high dependency unit, the top three DDD/100 days were meropenem (77.9), colistin (41.4), and piperacillin-tazobactam (13.5) versus the top 3 DOT/100 patient days were meropenem (40.5), colistin (20.9), and piperacillin-tazobactam (15.7). In low-priority areas such as general wards, the top 3 DDD/100 patient days were meropenem (45.4), piperacillin-tazobactam (22.6), and cefoperazone (5.0) versus the top three DOT/100 patient days were meropenem (45.4), cefoperazone (44.9), and piperacillintazobactam (22.6). There was a downward trend of consumption of almost all these antibiotics when measured at baseline and the next two quarters. DDD and DOT per 100 patient days had a positive linear correlation during the study period.\n\n\n\nThe present study demonstrates about 50% reduction in consumption of ICMR priority antibiotics with a yearlong AMSP. DDD and DOT per 100 patient days can be calculated with minimal effort, even in extremely busy hospitals. DOT tools are less labor-intensive and, hence, should be the pivotal tool for antibiotic exposure measurement.\n","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"38 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jlp_17_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is the next pandemic with a huge global economic burden. A customized antimicrobial stewardship program (AMSP) is a well-recognized tool for containment of AMR. The current study was undertaken to identify the impact of AMSP measures on the trends of antibiotic consumption rates, e.g., defined daily dose (DDD) and days of therapy (DOT) per 100 patient days in pre-identified areas of the hospital. The present study was a case-record-based extended cross-sectional study carried out in a tertiary care institute in central India from January 2021 to September 2021. Time-bound feasible sampling was undertaken, and all cases were included without any exclusion criteria. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute and funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). The data was entered into a spreadsheet. The calculation of DDD and DOT was performed individually for each antibiotic as per WHO tool per 100 patient days. In high-priority areas such as intensive care unit and high dependency unit, the top three DDD/100 days were meropenem (77.9), colistin (41.4), and piperacillin-tazobactam (13.5) versus the top 3 DOT/100 patient days were meropenem (40.5), colistin (20.9), and piperacillin-tazobactam (15.7). In low-priority areas such as general wards, the top 3 DDD/100 patient days were meropenem (45.4), piperacillin-tazobactam (22.6), and cefoperazone (5.0) versus the top three DOT/100 patient days were meropenem (45.4), cefoperazone (44.9), and piperacillintazobactam (22.6). There was a downward trend of consumption of almost all these antibiotics when measured at baseline and the next two quarters. DDD and DOT per 100 patient days had a positive linear correlation during the study period. The present study demonstrates about 50% reduction in consumption of ICMR priority antibiotics with a yearlong AMSP. DDD and DOT per 100 patient days can be calculated with minimal effort, even in extremely busy hospitals. DOT tools are less labor-intensive and, hence, should be the pivotal tool for antibiotic exposure measurement.
分享
查看原文
抗菌药物管理计划的严格实践经验及其对抗生素消耗的影响
抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是下一个大流行病,会给全球带来巨大的经济负担。定制的抗菌药物管理计划(AMSP)是公认的遏制 AMR 的工具。本研究是一项基于病例记录的扩展横断面研究,于 2021 年 1 月至 2021 年 9 月在印度中部的一家三级医疗机构进行。本研究是一项基于病例记录的扩展横断面研究,于 2021 年 1 月至 2021 年 9 月在印度中部的一家三级医疗机构进行,采用了有时间限制的可行抽样方法,所有病例均纳入研究范围,无任何排除标准。该研究获得了该研究所伦理委员会的批准,并得到了印度医学研究理事会(ICMR)的资助。在重症监护病房和高依赖病房等高优先级地区,DDD/100 天的前三名分别是美罗培南(77.9)、可乐定(41.4)和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(13.5),而 DOT/100 天的前三名分别是美罗培南(40.5)、可乐定(20.9)和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(15.7)。在普通病房等低优先级区域,DDD/100 个病人日的前三名分别是美罗培南(45.4)、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(22.6)和头孢哌酮(5.0),而 DOT/100 个病人日的前三名分别是美罗培南(45.4)、头孢哌酮(44.9)和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(22.6)。在基线和接下来的两个季度中,几乎所有这些抗生素的消耗量都呈下降趋势。在研究期间,每 100 个患者日的 DDD 和 DOT 呈正线性相关。本研究表明,通过为期一年的 AMSP,ICMR 优先抗生素的消耗量减少了约 50%。即使在极其繁忙的医院,也能以最小的工作量计算出每 100 个患者日的 DDD 和 DOT。DOT工具的劳动密集程度较低,因此应成为抗生素暴露测量的关键工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信