Structural analysis of code-based algorithms of the NIST post-quantum call

Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1093/jigpal/jzae071
M. Á. González de la Torre, L. H. Encinas, J. I. S. GarcÍa
{"title":"Structural analysis of code-based algorithms of the NIST post-quantum call","authors":"M. Á. González de la Torre, L. H. Encinas, J. I. S. GarcÍa","doi":"10.1093/jigpal/jzae071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Code-based cryptography is currently the second most promising post-quantum mathematical tool for quantum-resistant algorithms. Since in 2022 the first post-quantum standard Key Encapsulation Mechanism, Kyber (a latticed-based algorithm), was selected to be established as standard, and after that the National Institute of Standards and Technology post-quantum standardization call focused in code-based cryptosystems. Three of the four candidates that remain in the fourth round are code-based algorithms. In fact, the only non-code-based algorithm (SIKE) is now considered vulnerable. Due to this landscape, it is crucial to update previous results about these algorithms and their functioning. The Fujisaki-Okamoto transformation is a key part of the study of post-quantum algorithms and in this work we focus our analysis on Classic McEliece, BIKE and HQC proposals, and how they apply this transformation to obtain IND-CCA semantic security. Since after security the most important parameter in the evaluation of the algorithms is performance, we have compared the performance of the code-based algorithms of the NIST call considering the same architecture for all of them.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzae071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Code-based cryptography is currently the second most promising post-quantum mathematical tool for quantum-resistant algorithms. Since in 2022 the first post-quantum standard Key Encapsulation Mechanism, Kyber (a latticed-based algorithm), was selected to be established as standard, and after that the National Institute of Standards and Technology post-quantum standardization call focused in code-based cryptosystems. Three of the four candidates that remain in the fourth round are code-based algorithms. In fact, the only non-code-based algorithm (SIKE) is now considered vulnerable. Due to this landscape, it is crucial to update previous results about these algorithms and their functioning. The Fujisaki-Okamoto transformation is a key part of the study of post-quantum algorithms and in this work we focus our analysis on Classic McEliece, BIKE and HQC proposals, and how they apply this transformation to obtain IND-CCA semantic security. Since after security the most important parameter in the evaluation of the algorithms is performance, we have compared the performance of the code-based algorithms of the NIST call considering the same architecture for all of them.
分享
查看原文
NIST 后量子调用基于代码算法的结构分析
基于代码的密码学是目前后量子时代最有前途的抗量子算法数学工具之二。自 2022 年首个后量子标准 "密钥封装机制"(Kyber,一种基于晶格的算法)被选为标准以来,美国国家标准与技术研究院的后量子标准化征集活动一直将重点放在基于代码的密码系统上。在第四轮剩下的四种候选算法中,有三种是基于代码的算法。事实上,唯一一种非基于代码的算法(SIKE)现在被认为是脆弱的。鉴于这种情况,更新以前关于这些算法及其功能的结果至关重要。藤崎-冈本变换是研究后量子算法的关键部分,在这项工作中,我们将重点分析经典 McEliece、BIKE 和 HQC 方案,以及它们如何应用这种变换来获得 IND-CCA 语义安全性。由于在安全性之后,算法评估中最重要的参数是性能,因此我们比较了 NIST 调用的基于代码的算法的性能,并考虑到所有算法都采用相同的架构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信