Gendering the language of genocide

Laura Miñano Mañero
{"title":"Gendering the language of genocide","authors":"Laura Miñano Mañero","doi":"10.1075/jlac.00111.min","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Exploring the Holocaust through a gendered lens, this article examines linguistic aggression against women in Nazi\n concentration camps. While extensive scholarship connects language to genocide, the imbrication between gender, language and\n genocide remains an under-researched subject. To further this discussion, I analyze female survivors’ memoirs to explore the\n processes of semantic deprecation through metaphorization. Relying on cognitive semantics (Lakoff and Johnson 1980), I concentrate on euphemistic and dysphemistic metaphors that construct women’s identities in\n terms of otherness, by means of zoosemic and reifying conceptualizations, among others. The sources under examination encompass\n Jewish survivors Liana Millu (2001); Gisella Perl\n (2019), and Anne-Lise Stern (2004), and non-Jewish resisters Margarete Buber-Neumann (2008); Wanda Półtawska (1989),\n and Germaine Tillion (1997). Considering the relationship between metaphorical language and perceived stereotypes about women and\n the feminine, and focusing on specific lexical items, I hope to unravel the nexus between linguistic aggression and patriarchal\n structures in the concentration camp system. I argue that metaphorization reinforced women’s inferior position and perpetuated\n gender stereotypes. I suggest that, paradoxically, this violence also triggered empowering processes of linguistic\n reappropriation, asserting the victims’ agency.","PeriodicalId":324436,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","volume":"52 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00111.min","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exploring the Holocaust through a gendered lens, this article examines linguistic aggression against women in Nazi concentration camps. While extensive scholarship connects language to genocide, the imbrication between gender, language and genocide remains an under-researched subject. To further this discussion, I analyze female survivors’ memoirs to explore the processes of semantic deprecation through metaphorization. Relying on cognitive semantics (Lakoff and Johnson 1980), I concentrate on euphemistic and dysphemistic metaphors that construct women’s identities in terms of otherness, by means of zoosemic and reifying conceptualizations, among others. The sources under examination encompass Jewish survivors Liana Millu (2001); Gisella Perl (2019), and Anne-Lise Stern (2004), and non-Jewish resisters Margarete Buber-Neumann (2008); Wanda Półtawska (1989), and Germaine Tillion (1997). Considering the relationship between metaphorical language and perceived stereotypes about women and the feminine, and focusing on specific lexical items, I hope to unravel the nexus between linguistic aggression and patriarchal structures in the concentration camp system. I argue that metaphorization reinforced women’s inferior position and perpetuated gender stereotypes. I suggest that, paradoxically, this violence also triggered empowering processes of linguistic reappropriation, asserting the victims’ agency.
种族灭绝语言的性别化
本文通过性别视角探讨大屠杀,研究纳粹集中营中对妇女的语言侵害。虽然大量学术研究将语言与种族灭绝联系在一起,但性别、语言和种族灭绝之间的联系仍然是一个研究不足的主题。为了推进这一讨论,我分析了女性幸存者的回忆录,以探讨通过隐喻化进行语义贬损的过程。根据认知语义学(Lakoff 和 Johnson,1980 年),我将重点放在委婉隐喻和有歧义隐喻上,这些隐喻通过 "动物性"(zoosemic)和 "重化"(reifying)概念化等手段,从 "他者"(otherness)的角度构建女性身份。研究对象包括犹太幸存者 Liana Millu(2001 年)、Gisella Perl(2019 年)和 Anne-Lise Stern(2004 年),以及非犹太抵抗者 Margarete Buber-Neumann(2008 年)、Wanda Półtawska(1989 年)和 Germaine Tillion(1997 年)。考虑到隐喻性语言与对妇女和女性的刻板印象之间的关系,并将重点放在特定的词汇项目上,我希望能揭开集中营系统中语言侵略与父权制结构之间的联系。我认为,隐喻化强化了女性的劣等地位,并使性别刻板印象永久化。我认为,矛盾的是,这种暴力也引发了语言再利用的赋权过程,维护了受害者的能动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信