Impact of a Distress Brief Intervention on Suicidal Ideation, Suicide Attempts and Self-harm in the immediate, short and longer term: a mixed method evaluation study protocol

Joanne McLean, Jessica Shields, J. Wildman, Asiya Hamid, Andrew MacGregor, Catherine Best, Edward Duncan, Stacey McNicol, Linda Fenocchi, Helen Mason, Donald MacIntyre, Ambrose J. Melson, Rory O'Connor
{"title":"Impact of a Distress Brief Intervention on Suicidal Ideation, Suicide Attempts and Self-harm in the immediate, short and longer term: a mixed method evaluation study protocol","authors":"Joanne McLean, Jessica Shields, J. Wildman, Asiya Hamid, Andrew MacGregor, Catherine Best, Edward Duncan, Stacey McNicol, Linda Fenocchi, Helen Mason, Donald MacIntyre, Ambrose J. Melson, Rory O'Connor","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13592.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The Distress Brief Intervention (DBI) is a new approach aimed at reducing distress and is embedded in Scotland’s suicide prevention and mental health strategies. People in distress can be referred to DBI by front-line healthcare and emergency service staff. DBI promises to make contact within 24 hours and offers people in distress 14 days of compassionate, community-based, and person-centred support. The development of NHS 24, a new specialist National Health Service Mental Health Hub (MHH) embedded in Scotland’s urgent care service created a new national route to access DBI. Protocol This study is a mixed-method evaluation of the impact of DBI on suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and self-harm in the immediate, short and longer term among people presenting in distress. Evaluation participants include adults who access DBI, DBI staff, individuals who have used NHS 24 MHH, and GPs. A combination of analysis of quantitative survey and linked administrative data, including a comparator group analysis, qualitative interview and focus group data will support understanding of whether and how DBI can reduce suicidal ideation, suicidal behaviour and self-harm among those presenting to front-line services in distress. A survey of General Practitioners and a review of existing literature will be used to model typical care pathways for individuals in distress and at risk of self-harm. Modelled resource use and costs will be explored. All data collected will be triangulated through a summative evidence synthesis to develop evidence-based insights and conclusions to inform policy and practice development. Discussion Understanding whether, how and why DBI has helped prevent future suicidal thoughts and behaviour in those with a history of suicidal risk will provide important insights into how the intervention can be further developed and optimised as a suicide prevention intervention.","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"68 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13592.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The Distress Brief Intervention (DBI) is a new approach aimed at reducing distress and is embedded in Scotland’s suicide prevention and mental health strategies. People in distress can be referred to DBI by front-line healthcare and emergency service staff. DBI promises to make contact within 24 hours and offers people in distress 14 days of compassionate, community-based, and person-centred support. The development of NHS 24, a new specialist National Health Service Mental Health Hub (MHH) embedded in Scotland’s urgent care service created a new national route to access DBI. Protocol This study is a mixed-method evaluation of the impact of DBI on suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and self-harm in the immediate, short and longer term among people presenting in distress. Evaluation participants include adults who access DBI, DBI staff, individuals who have used NHS 24 MHH, and GPs. A combination of analysis of quantitative survey and linked administrative data, including a comparator group analysis, qualitative interview and focus group data will support understanding of whether and how DBI can reduce suicidal ideation, suicidal behaviour and self-harm among those presenting to front-line services in distress. A survey of General Practitioners and a review of existing literature will be used to model typical care pathways for individuals in distress and at risk of self-harm. Modelled resource use and costs will be explored. All data collected will be triangulated through a summative evidence synthesis to develop evidence-based insights and conclusions to inform policy and practice development. Discussion Understanding whether, how and why DBI has helped prevent future suicidal thoughts and behaviour in those with a history of suicidal risk will provide important insights into how the intervention can be further developed and optimised as a suicide prevention intervention.
压力简易干预对自杀意念、自杀未遂和自残的即时、短期和长期影响:混合方法评估研究方案
背景 困境简单干预(DBI)是一种旨在减少困境的新方法,已被纳入苏格兰的自杀预防和心理健康战略。一线医护人员和急救服务人员可将处于困境中的人转介至 DBI。DBI 承诺在 24 小时内与受困者取得联系,并为他们提供 14 天以社区为基础、以人为本的关怀支持。国家医疗服务体系 24 的发展,即嵌入苏格兰紧急护理服务的一个新的专业国家医疗服务体系心理健康中心 (MHH),开辟了一条新的全国性 DBI 途径。协议 本研究是一项混合方法评估,旨在评估 DBI 在当前、短期和长期内对处于困境中的人的自杀意念、自杀企图和自残行为的影响。评估参与者包括使用 DBI 的成年人、DBI 工作人员、使用过 NHS 24 MHH 的个人以及全科医生。综合分析定量调查和相关行政数据(包括参照组分析)、定性访谈和焦点小组数据,将有助于了解 DBI 是否以及如何减少向一线服务机构求助的受困者的自杀意念、自杀行为和自残行为。将通过对全科医生的调查和对现有文献的回顾,为处于困境和有自残风险的个人建立典型的护理路径模型。将对资源使用和成本模型进行探讨。所有收集到的数据都将通过总结性证据综述进行三角测量,从而得出以证据为基础的见解和结论,为政策和实践发展提供依据。讨论 了解 DBI 是否、如何以及为何有助于预防有自杀风险史的人未来的自杀想法和行为,将为如何进一步发展和优化自杀预防干预措施提供重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信