A Glimpse into the Prognostic Factors of Outcomes for Isolated, Operated Severe Traumatic Head Injury Patients in a Resource Constrained Trauma Center Setup

IF 0.2 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Anil Chandra, B. Ojha, C. Srivastava, Somil Jaiswal, Aman Singh
{"title":"A Glimpse into the Prognostic Factors of Outcomes for Isolated, Operated Severe Traumatic Head Injury Patients in a Resource Constrained Trauma Center Setup","authors":"Anil Chandra, B. Ojha, C. Srivastava, Somil Jaiswal, Aman Singh","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1782614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) continues to burden health care in developing countries. This study focuses on STBI patients undergoing surgical intervention to understand the factors affecting their outcomes in a constrained trauma center setup.\n Aim This aims to study the epidemiological and clinical factors to understand the long-term morbidity, mortality risks, and triaging among STBI patients requiring surgery.\n Methods A prospective observational study was conducted on 227 isolated STBI patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 8 who underwent surgical evacuation of intracranial lesions. Patients were classified based on their neurological status and lesions on computed tomography head. Postoperative data on complications were collected. At 6-month follow-up, patients with Glasgow (Extended) scores of 7 to 8 were deemed good outcomes, and scores of 1 to 6 were deemed poor. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent influencing factors, with p < 0.05 as statistically significant.\n Results The clinicoradiological factors including age (p = 0.02), asymmetric pupillary reaction (p = 0.002), low presenting pulse rate (p = 0.041), and low systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.016 and p < 0.0001, respectively), low GCS (p = 0.011), midline shift > 5 mm (p < 0.0001), and obliterated basal cisterns were significantly associated with poor outcome. Tracheostomy, respiratory tract infection, bedsore, meningitis, deep vein thrombosis, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and bone flap site infection were significantly associated with survival of the patients (p = 0.036). The most common cause of mortality during home care included respiratory tract infection and was associated with the care of the tracheostomized. GCS (p < 0.0001), age (p = 0.005), and alcohol use (p = 0.034) were independent predictors for the outcome of patients.\n Conclusion This study helps clinicians predict prognosis, postoperative recovery, manage challenges, counsel caregivers, and predict long-term patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":43198,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Neurotrauma","volume":"80 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1782614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) continues to burden health care in developing countries. This study focuses on STBI patients undergoing surgical intervention to understand the factors affecting their outcomes in a constrained trauma center setup. Aim This aims to study the epidemiological and clinical factors to understand the long-term morbidity, mortality risks, and triaging among STBI patients requiring surgery. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted on 227 isolated STBI patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 8 who underwent surgical evacuation of intracranial lesions. Patients were classified based on their neurological status and lesions on computed tomography head. Postoperative data on complications were collected. At 6-month follow-up, patients with Glasgow (Extended) scores of 7 to 8 were deemed good outcomes, and scores of 1 to 6 were deemed poor. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent influencing factors, with p < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results The clinicoradiological factors including age (p = 0.02), asymmetric pupillary reaction (p = 0.002), low presenting pulse rate (p = 0.041), and low systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.016 and p < 0.0001, respectively), low GCS (p = 0.011), midline shift > 5 mm (p < 0.0001), and obliterated basal cisterns were significantly associated with poor outcome. Tracheostomy, respiratory tract infection, bedsore, meningitis, deep vein thrombosis, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and bone flap site infection were significantly associated with survival of the patients (p = 0.036). The most common cause of mortality during home care included respiratory tract infection and was associated with the care of the tracheostomized. GCS (p < 0.0001), age (p = 0.005), and alcohol use (p = 0.034) were independent predictors for the outcome of patients. Conclusion This study helps clinicians predict prognosis, postoperative recovery, manage challenges, counsel caregivers, and predict long-term patient outcomes.
资源有限的创伤中心隔离手术严重创伤性颅脑损伤患者预后因素一瞥
背景 严重创伤性脑损伤(STBI)一直是发展中国家医疗保健的负担。本研究重点关注接受外科干预的 STBI 患者,以了解在受限的创伤中心环境中影响其预后的因素。目的 通过研究流行病学和临床因素,了解需要手术治疗的 STBI 患者的长期发病率、死亡风险和分流情况。方法 对格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)≤ 8、接受颅内病灶手术切除的 227 例孤立性 STBI 患者进行前瞻性观察研究。根据患者的神经系统状况和计算机断层扫描头颅上的病灶对其进行了分类。收集术后并发症数据。在6个月的随访中,格拉斯哥(扩展)评分为7至8分的患者预后良好,评分为1至6分的患者预后较差。利用 Cox 回归分析确定了独立的影响因素,其中 p 5 mm(p < 0.0001)和基底蝶窦闭塞与不良预后显著相关。气管切开、呼吸道感染、褥疮、脑膜炎、深静脉血栓、脑脊液漏和骨瓣部位感染与患者的生存率显著相关(p = 0.036)。家庭护理期间最常见的死亡原因包括呼吸道感染,这与气管插管患者的护理有关。GCS(p < 0.0001)、年龄(p = 0.005)和饮酒(p = 0.034)是预测患者结局的独立因素。结论 本研究有助于临床医生预测预后、术后恢复、应对挑战、为护理人员提供咨询并预测患者的长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信